Responsible Business Conduct in the European Union’s Investment Policy

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1508-2008.27.28

Keywords:

EU investment policy, foreign direct investment (FDI), international trade and investment agreements, responsible business conduct, corporate social responsibility, sustainable development

Abstract

This paper aims to characterize the role of responsible business conduct (RBC)/corporate social responsibility (CSR) within the European Union’s (EU) common investment policy. It explores how the EU uses CSR/RBC to promote sustainable development in the context of foreign direct investment (FDI). The main research objectives include an assessment of the potential impact of the provisions on CSR/RBC included in the EU’s international trade/investment agreements on achieving the sustainable goals in host and home countries of FDI, methods of implementing these provisions in international relations, and the future role of the World Trade Organization’s (WTO) Investment Facilitation Framework for Development (IFD) Agreement in reshaping the EU’s investment policy.
The study employs qualitative methods, supported by the examination of examples of the EU’s new generation of international trade and economic partnership agreements (Korea, Canada, and Japan). The EU treats RBC/CSR as a crucial tool for achieving the UN Agenda 2030’s sustainable development goals. Responsible business behavior is promoted and supported by the instruments of the EU’s trade and investment policies. Since RBC/CSR is voluntary, agreements are enforced through soft measures and actions. The only strong instrument, i.e., trade sanctions, is treated as the last resort and has not been used so far.
The newly negotiated WTO Investment Facilitation for Development (IFD) Agreement is expected to enhance the re‑orientation of the EU’s policy towards facilitating foreign investment in relations with developing countries. The paper’s main contribution lies in its examination of the EU’s approach towards CSR/RBC in its international trade/investment agreements. It also analyses the problems associated with implementing RBC/CSR provisions within these agreements.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Benabou, R., Tirole, J. (2010), Individual and Corporate Social Responsibility, “Economica”, 77 (305), pp. 1–19, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0335.2009.00843.x
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0335.2009.00843.x

Berger, A., Chi, M., Hoekman, B., Mbengue, M.M., Sauvant, K.P., Stephenson, M. (2021), Facilitating Sustainable Investment to Build Back Better, “Journal of World Trade”, 55 (6), pp. 881–894, https://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/73602/TRAD2021037.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y (accessed: 23.04.2023).
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.54648/TRAD2021037

Bondy, K., Moon, J., Matten, D. (2012), An Institution of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in Multi‑National Corporations (MNCs): Form and Implications, “Journal of Business Ethics”, 111, pp. 281–299, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1208-7
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1208-7

Carroll, A.B., Shabana, K.M. (2010), The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review of Concepts, Research and Practice, “International Journal of Management Reviews”, 12 (1), pp. 85–105, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00275.x
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00275.x

Chaisse, J. (2022), FDI and sustainable development in the EU‑China investment treaty: Neither high nor low, just realistic expectations, “Columbia FDI Perspectives”, No. 323, Columbia University, New York, https://ccsi.columbia.edu/sites/default/files/content/docs/fdi%20perspectives/No%20323%20‑%20Chaisse%20‑%20FINAL.pdf (accessed: 23.04.2023).
Google Scholar

Crane, A., Matten, D., Spence, L.J. (2014), Corporate Social Responsibility: in a Global Context, [in:] A. Crane, D. Matten, L.J. Spence (eds.), Corporate Social Responsibility: Readings and Cases in a Global Context, Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, London–New York, pp. 3–26.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429294273-2

EESC (2023), Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on Multilateral investor‑State arbitration court: assessment of the UNCITRAL process and its achievements in light of civil society recommendations, Official Journal of the European Union, C 75/130, 28.02.2023, https://eur‑lex.europa.eu/legal‑content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52022IE1963 (accessed: 8.06.2023).
Google Scholar

European Commission (2001), Green Paper on Promoting a European Framework for Corporate Social Responsibility, Brussels, 18.07.2001, COM(2001)366 final, https://eur‑lex.europa.eu/legal‑content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52001DC0366&from=EN (accessed: 27.01.2023).
Google Scholar

European Commission (2002), Communication from the Commission concerning Corporate Social Responsibility: A business contribution to Sustainable Development, Brussels, 2.07.2002, COM(2002)347 final, https://eur‑lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2002:0347:FIN:en:PDF (accessed: 27.03.2023).
Google Scholar

European Commission (2011), Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. A Renewed EU Strategy 2011–14 for Corporate Social Responsibility, Brussels, 25.10.2011, COM(2011)681 final, https://eur‑lex.europa.eu/legal‑content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52011DC0681&from=EN (accessed: 22.01.2023).
Google Scholar

European Commission (2015), Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Trade for all. Towards a more responsible trade and investment policy, Brussels, 14.10.2015, COM(2015)497 final, https://eur‑lex.europa.eu/legal‑content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52015DC0497&from=en (accessed: 11.02.2023).
Google Scholar

European Commission (2018), Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council, Protection of intra‑EU investment, Brussels, 19.07.2018, COM(2018)547 final, https://eur‑lex.europa.eu/legal‑content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52018DC0547&rid=8 (accessed: 11.03.2023).
Google Scholar

European Commission (2019a), Recommendation for a Council Decision supplementing the negotiating directives for the Doha Development Agenda regarding the negotiations of a multilateral framework on investment facilitation, Brussels, 3.07.2019, COM(2019)314 final, https://eur‑lex.europa.eu/legal‑content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52019PC0314&rid=9 (accessed: 14.06.2023).
Google Scholar

European Commission (2019b), EU moves ahead with dispute settlement over workers’ rights in Republic of Korea, https://policy.trade.ec.europa.eu/news/eu‑moves‑ahead‑dispute‑settlement‑over‑workers‑rights‑republic‑korea-2019-07-05_en (accessed: 28.04.2023).
Google Scholar

European Commission (2021), Panel of experts confirms the Republic of Korea is in breach of labour commitments under our trade agreement, https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_21_203 (accessed: 28.04.2023).
Google Scholar

European Commission (2022a), Proposal for a Directive of the European Union and of the Council on Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence and amending Directive (EU) 2019/1937, Brussels, 23.02.2022, COM(2022) final, https://eur‑lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:bc4dcea4-9584-11ec‑b4e4-01aa75ed71a1.0001.02/DOC_1&format=PDF (accessed: 19.04.2023).
Google Scholar

European Commission (2022b), Just and legal sustainable economy: Commission lays down rules for companies to respect human rights and environment in global value chains, https://single‑market‑economy.ec.europa.eu/news/just‑and‑sustainable‑economy‑commission‑lays‑down‑rules‑companies‑respect‑human‑rights‑and-2022-02-23_en (accessed: 18.04.2023).
Google Scholar

European Commission (2023a), Reform of the ISDS mechanism, https://policy.trade.ec.europa.eu/enforcement‑and‑protection/dispute‑settlement/investment‑disputes/reform‑isds‑mechanism_en (accessed: 17.03.2023).
Google Scholar

European Commission (2023b), Southern Neighbourhood, https://policy.trade.ec.europa.eu/eu‑trade‑relationships‑country‑and‑region/countries‑and‑regions/southern‑neighbourhood_en (accessed: 9.07.2024).
Google Scholar

European Commission (2023c), EU‑China agreement explained, https://policy.trade.ec.europa.eu/eu‑trade‑relationships‑country‑and‑region/countries‑and‑regions/china/eu‑china‑agreement/agreement‑explained_en (accessed: 14.04.2023).
Google Scholar

European Commission (2023d), Sustainable development in EU trade agreements, https://policy.trade.ec.europa.eu/development‑and‑sustainability/sustainable‑development/sustainable‑development‑eu‑trade‑agreements_en (accessed 16.04.2023).
Google Scholar

European Commission (2023e), EU’s first Sustainable Investment Facilitation Agreement enters into force with Angola, https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_24_4462 (accessed: 26.09.2024).
Google Scholar

European Commission (2024), Enforcement and protection, https://policy.trade.ec.europa.eu/enforcement‑and‑protection_en (accessed: 26.09.2024).
Google Scholar

European Commission (n.d.), Investment, https://policy.trade.ec.europa.eu/help‑exporters‑and‑importers/accessing‑markets/investment_en (accessed: 11.02.2023).
Google Scholar

European Commission (n.d.), Korea labour commitments, https://policy.trade.ec.europa.eu/enforcement‑and‑protection/dispute‑settlement/bilateral‑disputes/korea‑labour‑commitments_en (accessed: 28.04.2023).
Google Scholar

European Union (2022), Directive (EU) 2022/2464 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2022 amending Regulation (EU) No. 537/2014, Directive 2004/109/EC, Directive 2006/43/EC and Directive 2013/34/EU, as regards corporate sustainability reporting (Text with EEA relevance), Official Journal of the European Union, L 322/15, 16.12.2022, https://eur‑lex.europa.eu/legal‑content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32022L2464&from=EN (accessed: 7.02.2023).
Google Scholar

Fasciglione, M. (2020), Implementing “Responsible Business Conduct” Approaches under the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights at the Time of COVID–19, “European Papers”, 5 (3), https://doi.org/10.15166/2499-8249/404
Google Scholar

ICSID (2022), ICSID. Convention, Regulations and Rules, Washington, https://icsid.worldbank.org/sites/default/files/documents/ICSID_Convention.pdf (accessed 19.03.2023).
Google Scholar

Ingrams, M., Booth, K. (2023), Hardening soft law: strategic use of the OECD Guidelines to achieve meaningful outcomes, “Columbia FDI Perspective”, 351, Columbia University, New York, https://ccsi.columbia.edu/sites/default/files/content/docs/fdi%20perspectives/No%20351%20‑Ingrams%20and%20Booth%20‑%20FINAL.pdf (accessed: 7.02.2023).
Google Scholar

OECD (2018), OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Business Conduct, https://mneguidelines.oecd.org/OECD‑Due‑Diligence‑Guidance‑for‑Responsible‑Business‑Conduct.pdf (accessed 19.03.2023).
Google Scholar

OECD (2023), OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises on Responsible Business Conduct, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/81f92357‑en
Google Scholar

OECD (n.d.), Responsible Business Conduct and the Sustainable Development Goals, https://mneguidelines.oecd.org/RBC‑and‑the‑sustainable‑development‑goals.pdf (accessed: 3.02.2023).
Google Scholar

OJEU (2011), Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Korea, of the other part, Official Journal of the European Union, L 127/6, 14.05.2011, https://investmentpolicy.unctad.org/international‑investment‑agreements/treaty‑files/2602/download (accessed: 6.04.2023).
Google Scholar

OJEU (2017), Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) between Canada, of the one part, and the European Union and its Member States, of the other part, Official Journal of the European Union, L 11/23, 14.01.2017, https://eur‑lex.europa.eu/legal‑content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:22017A0114(01)&from=EN (accessed 6.04.2023).
Google Scholar

OJEU (2018), Agreement between the European Union and Japan for an Economic Partnership, Official Journal of the European Union, L 330/3, 27.12.2018, https://eur‑lex.europa.eu/legal‑content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A22018A1227%2801%29 (accessed: 25.09.2024).
Google Scholar

OJEU (2019), Regulation (EU) 2019/452 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 March 2019 establishing a framework for the screening of foreign direct investments into the Union, https://eur‑lex.europa.eu/legal‑content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32019R0452 (accessed: 25.09.2024).
Google Scholar

Sauvant, K.P. (2022), Six Reasons for Emphasizing Responsible Business Conduct in the Nascent WTO Agreement on Investment Facilitation for Development, “SIPA, Multilateralism in Action”, 13 October, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4249357 (accessed: 20.01.2023).
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4249357

Schwartz, M.S., Carroll, A.B. (2003), Corporate Social Responsibility: A Three‑Domain Approach, “Business Ethics Quarterly”, 13 (4), pp. 503–530.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/beq200313435

Shavin, C. (2019), Unlocking the Potential of the New OECD Due Diligence Guidance on Responsible Business Conduct, “Business and Human Rights Journal”, 4 (1), pp. 139–145, https://doi.org/10.1017/bhj.2018.28
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/bhj.2018.28

Spinaci, S. (2022), Corporate sustainability due diligence. How to integrate human rights and environmental concerns in value chains, Briefing. EU legislation in Progress, EPRS/European Parliament Research Service, Third edition, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2022/729424/EPRS_BRI(2022)729424_EN.pdf (accessed: 25.09.2024).
Google Scholar

SWD (2019), Commission Staff Working Document – Corporate Social Responsibility, Responsible Business Conduct, and Business & Human Rights: Overview of Progress, Brussels, 20.03.2019, SWD (2019) 143 final, https://ec.europa.eu/docsroom/documents/34482 (accessed: 17.01.2023).
Google Scholar

TFEU (2012), Consolidated Version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Official Journal of the European Union, 26.10.2012, C 326/47, https://eur‑lex.europa.eu/legal‑content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:12012E/TXT&from=EN (accessed: 13.02.2023).
Google Scholar

UN (2011), The UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. An Introduction, https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/Issues/Business/Intro_Guiding_PrinciplesBusinessHR.pdf (accessed: 24.01.2023).
Google Scholar

UN (2015), United Nations Convention on Transparency in Treaty‑based Investor‑State Arbitration, New York, https://uncitral.un.org/sites/uncitral.un.org/files/media‑documents/uncitral/en/transparency‑convention‑e.pdf (accessed: 19.03.2023).
Google Scholar

UNCTAD (1999), World Investment Report. Foreign Direct Investment and the Challenge of Development, New York and Geneva, https://unctad.org/system/files/official‑document/wir1999_en.pdf (accessed: 26.09.2024).
Google Scholar

UNCTAD (2023a), Investment Policy Hub, International Investment Agreements Navigator, https://investmentpolicy.unctad.org/international‑investment‑agreements/groupings/28/eu‑european‑union‑ (accessed: 29.09.2024).
Google Scholar

UNCTAD (2023b), Investment Policy Hub. Investment Dispute Settlement Navigator, https://investmentpolicy.unctad.org/investment‑dispute‑settlement (accessed: 26.09.2024).
Google Scholar

Van der Loo, G., Hahn, M. (2020), EU Trade and Investment Policy since the Treaty of Lisbon. Achievements and Future Priorities, CEPS Research Report, Brussels, https://www.ceps.eu/wp‑content/uploads/2020/10/RR2020-04_EU‑Trade‑and‑Investment‑Policy.pdf (accessed: 28.04.2023).
Google Scholar

WTO (2023), Investment Facilitation for Development Agreement, https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/invfac_public_e/factsheet_ifd.pdf (accessed: 26.09.2024).
Google Scholar

WTO (2024), Investment facilitation for development (IFD), https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/invfac_public_e/invfac_e.htm (accessed: 26.09.2024).
Google Scholar

Yannaca‑Small, K. (2022), Shaping responsible business conduct through a Multilateral Treaty on Due Diligence, “Columbia FDI Perspectives”, 332, Columbia University, Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment (CCSI), New York, https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/260495/1/fdi‑perspectives‑no332.pdf (accessed: 8.06.2023).
Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2024-12-19

How to Cite

Witkowska, J. (2024). Responsible Business Conduct in the European Union’s Investment Policy. Comparative Economic Research. Central and Eastern Europe, 27(4), 7–27. https://doi.org/10.18778/1508-2008.27.28

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>