The Attitudes of the European Union and China Towards Foreign Direct Investment: Implications for Bilateral Relations

Janina Witkowska

doi:10.2478/cer-2019-0024

Authors

Janina Witkowska University of Lodz, Faculty of Economics and Sociology Department of World Economy and European Integration, Lodz, Poland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2478/cer-2019-0024

Keywords:

EU‑China relations, policy towards foreign direct investment (FDI), the EU‑China Comprehensive Agreement on Investment (CAI), “One Belt One Road’ initiative

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to discuss new trends that have occurred in the policies of the EU and China towards foreign direct investment (FDI), to examine some implications of the EU‑China Comprehensive Agreement on Investment (CAI) – which is currently being negotiated – for their bilateral relations, and to assess the role which China’s “One Belt One Road’ (OBOR) initiative might play in its relations with the new EU Member States. The EU established freedom of capital movement with third countries; however, the introduction of the common investment policy has encountered some obstacles. These are related to investor protection and ISDS issues. In turn, China is carrying out an independent state policy towards foreign investment with limited liberalization of FDI flows. The negotiated EU‑China CAI is expected to create conditions conducive to bilateral foreign investment flows, and it might bring positive effects for their economies in the future. However, the progress made thus far in the negotiations is still limited. The relations between China and the new EU Member states (CEE countries) are characterized by common interests in the field of FDI flows. The new EU countries are interested in attracting Chinese FDI and seem not to show the fears that have arisen in the old EU countries.

Downloads

References

Beaumier, G., Quellet, R. (2018), Europe’s New Investment Policy Faces an Uncertain Future, “Columbia FDI Perspectives”, No. 218.
Google Scholar

Borovikov, E., Crevon‑Tarassova, A., Evtimov, B. (2017), European Union, [in:] The International Arbitration Review, Edition 8, https://thelawreviews.co.uk/edition/the‑international‑arbitration‑review‑edition–8/114 (accessed: 19.04.2018).
Google Scholar

Cannon, A., Ambrose, H., Naish, V. (2018), Progress Towards a Multinational Investment Court? EU‑Monumentum Building and Division in UNCITRAL Working Group III , Herbert Smith Freehills “Arbitration Notes”, 15.05.2018, https://hsfnotes.com/arbitration/2018/05/115/progress‑towards‑a‑multinational‑investment (accessed: 7.12.2018).
Google Scholar

Chaisse, J., Vaccaro‑Incisa, M. (2018), The EU Investment Court: Challenges on the Path Ahead, “Columbia FDI Perspectives”, No. 219.
Google Scholar

Cheng, L.K. (2005), China’s Experience with Foreign Direct Investment: Lessons for Developing Economies, [in:] ed. H.S. Kehal, Foreign Investment in Rapidly Growing Countries. The Chinese and Indian Experiences, Palgrave MacMillan, Basingstoke, New York.
Google Scholar

China’s New Tax Incentives (2008), “China Briefing”, Dezan Shira & Associates, 2008/06/18.
Google Scholar

Clegg, J., Voss, H. (2016), The New Two‑Way Street of Chinese Direct Investment in the European Union, “China‑EU Law Journal”, Springer, DOI 10.1007/s12689–016–0063‑x.
Google Scholar

Deutscher Richterbund (2016), Stellungnahme zur Errichtung eines Investitionsgerichts fur TTIP‑ Vorschlag der Europaischen Kommission vom 16.09. 2015, No. 4, February http://www.drb.de/fileadmin/docs/Stellungnahmen/2016/DRB_160201_Stn_Nr_04_Europaeisches_Investitionsgericht.pdf (accessed: 12.05.2016).
Google Scholar

EC (2015), Commission Proposes New Investment Court System for TTIP and Other EU Trade and Investment Negotiations, http://europa.eu/rapid/press‑release_IP–15–5651_en.htm (accessed: 4.03.2018).
Google Scholar

EC (2017), State of the Union 2017, A Multilateral Investment Court, http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2017/september/tradoc_156042.pdf (accessed: 15.03.2018).
Google Scholar

EC (2017a), EU‑China Investment Agreement: Report of 16th Round of Negotiations, Brussels–12 to 15 December 2017.
Google Scholar

EC (2017a), Foreign Direct Investment – An EU Screening Framework, State of the Union 2017, http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2017/september/tradoc_156040.pdf (accessed: 21.04.2018).
Google Scholar

EC (2018), Note to the File. Subject: Report on the 19th round of negotiations for the EU‑China Investment Agreement, Brussels, 13 November 2018.
Google Scholar

EC (2018a), Commission Staff Working Document on the Movement of Capital and the Freedom of Payments, Brussels, 11.4.2018 SWD(2018) 103 final.
Google Scholar

European Parliament (2018), Legislative Train Schedule. A Balanced and Progressive Trade Policy to Harness Globalisation, Multilateral Investment Court (MIC), http://www.europarl.europa.eu/legislative-train/theme-a-balanced-and-progressive-trade-policy-to-harness-globalisation/file-multilateral-investment-court-(mic)/ (accessed: 8.12.2018).
Google Scholar

European Parliament (2018a), Legislative Train Schedule. A Balanced and Progressive Trade Policy to Harness Globalisation. EU‑China Comprehensive Agreement on Investment (EU‑China CAI), http://www.europarl.europa.eu/legislative-train/theme-a-balanced-and-progressive-trade-policy-to-harness-globalisation/file-multilateral-investment-court-(mic)/ (accessed: 8.12.2018).
Google Scholar

Eurostat (2017), Foreign Direct Investment stocks at the end of 2016, “Eurostat News release’ 201/2017, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/2995521/8558940/2–21122017‑BP‑EN.pdf/ee180a2c–5dd4–44c6‑b2e1–856bc8946c29 (accessed: 11.12.2018).
Google Scholar

Ewert, I. (2016), The EU‑China Bilateral Agreement: Between High Hopes and Real Challenges, Egmont Royal Institute for International Relations, “Security Policy Brief ’’ No. 68.
Google Scholar

Garcia, M. (2017), The EU‑China Comprehensive Agreement on Investment (CAI): Risks of Politicisation, EU‑China Observer #2.17, College of Europe.
Google Scholar

Garcia‑Herrero, A., Xu, J. (2017), How to handle state‑owned enterprises in EU‑China investment talks, “Policy Contribution”, Bruegel, Issue 8.
Google Scholar

Goralczyk, B. (2016), Spor o gospodarkę (chińsko) rynkową, Obserwatorfinansowy.pl 19.08.2016, https://www.obserwatorfinansowy.pl/tematyka/makroekonomia/spor‑o‑gospodarke‑chinskorynkowa/ (accessed: 15.12.2018).
Google Scholar

Greenpeace (2016), From ISDS to ICS: A Leopard Can’t Change its Spots. Position Paper on the Commission Proposal for an Investment Court System in TTIP, Brussels, http://www.greenpeace.org/eu‑unit/Global/eu‑unit/reports‑briefings/2016/2016_02_11_Greenpeace%20Position%20Paper%20ICS_Final.pdf
Google Scholar

Hale, G., Long, Ch. (2012), Foreign Direct Investment in China. Winners and Losers, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd, New Jersey, London, Singapore, Beijing, Shanghai, Hong Kong, Taipei, Chennai.
Google Scholar

Le, Y. (2017), China and Poland: Economic Cooperation Under the 16+1 Formula, ’Nouvelle Europe’ (on‑line), 1. 02.2017, www.nouwelle‑europe.eu.node/1960 (accessed: 27.04.2018).
Google Scholar

Li, X. (2010), China’s Outward Foreign Investment. A Political Perspective, University Press of America, Inc., Lanham, Boulder, New York, Toronto, Plymouth UK.
Google Scholar

Meunier, S. (2014), “Beggars can’t be Choosers’: The European Crisis and Chinese Direct Investment in the European Union, “Journal of European Integration”, Routledge, Vol. 36, No. 3.DOI: 10.1080/07036337.2014.885754.
Google Scholar

Opinion 2/15 of the Court (2017), ECLI:EU:C:2017:376, http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=190727&pageIndex=0&doclang=EN&‑mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=882092 (accessed: 4.03.2018).
Google Scholar

Shan, W., Wang, L. (2015), The China‑EU BIT and the Emerging, ‚Global BIT 2.0”, ’ICSID Review”, Vol. 30, No. 1, doi:10.1093/icsidreview/siu035.
Google Scholar

Shan, W., Zhang, S. (2011), The Treaty of Lisbon: Half Way toward a Common Investment Policy, “The European Journal of International Law”, Vol. 21, No. 4.
Google Scholar

The State Council The People’s Republic of China (2015), China unveils action plan on Belt and Road Initiative, http://english.gov.cn/news/top_news/2015/03/28/content_281475079055789.htm (accessed: 18.01.2018).
Google Scholar

UNCTAD (2017), Investment Dispute Settlement Navigator, https://investmentpolicyhubold.unctad.org/ISDS/ (accessed: 28.04.2018).
Google Scholar

UNCTAD (2018), World Investment Report 2018. Investment and New Industrial Policies, New York and Geneva.
Google Scholar

Wang, Y., (2017), China’s BIT Progress and Implications for China‑Canada FTA Talks, Centre for International Governance Innovation, “Policy Brief” No. 104, April.
Google Scholar

Weiniger, M., Croisant, G. (2017), The European Commission Proposes a Move Towards a Multilateral Investment Court System, https://www.law.ox.ac.uk/business‑law‑blog/blog/2017/11/european‑commission‑ (accessed: 4.03.2018).
Google Scholar

Yang, D., Jiang, L., Ng, A.K.Y. (2018), One Belt One Road, But Several Routes: A Case Study of New Emerging Trade Corridors Connecting the Far East to Europe, “Transportation Research” Part A 117, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.08.001.
Google Scholar

Ying, F. (2014), An Analysis of China’s Outward Foreign Direct Investment to the EU: Features and Problems, “International Journal of Management and Economics” (Zeszyty Naukowe KGS), No. 41, DOI: 102478/ijme–2014–0036.
Google Scholar

Zheng, J., (2017), Does Europe Matter? The Role of Europe in Chinese Narratives of “One Belt One Road and “New Type of Great Power Relations”, “Journal of Common Market Studies” Vol. 55, DOI:10.1111/jmcs.12535.
Google Scholar