Między elastycznością a spójnością – wykorzystanie metod asynchronicznych w jakościowym badaniu podłużnym realizowanym w trakcie pandemii COVID-19
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8069.18.3.02Słowa kluczowe:
techniki asynchroniczne, badanie jakościowe podłużne, COVID-19, etykaAbstrakt
Celem artykułu jest opisanie doświadczeń i wniosków płynących z zastosowania technik asynchronicznych w jakościowym badaniu podłużnym prowadzonym w trakcie pandemii COVID-19. Opracowanie ukazuje korzyści i ograniczenia oraz szanse i zagrożenia podejścia metodologicznego wykorzystującego wymianę asynchroniczną i dzienniczki. Perspektywa temporalna pozwoliła uchwycić dynamikę zmian związaną z pandemią, determinującą ewolucję technik asynchronicznych. Wyzwaniem pozostało zachowanie równowagi między elastycznością i spójnością metodologii oraz standardów etycznych mających na względzie dobro osób zaangażowanych w badanie.
Bibliografia
Alaszewski Andy (2006) Using Diaries for Social Research. London–Thousand Oaks, CA, New Delhi: Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857020215
Bampton Roberta, Cowton Christopher J. (2002) The E-interview. „Forum: Qualitative Social Research”, vol. 3(2) https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-3.2.848
Batorski Dominik, Olcoń-Kubicka Marta (2006) Prowadzenie badań przez Internet – podstawowe zagadnienia metodologiczne. „Studia Socjologiczne”, vol. 3(182), s. 99–132.
Beck Cheryl Tatano (2005) Benefits of Participating in Internet Discussions: Women Helping Women. „Qualitative Health Re-search”, vol. 15(3), s. 411–422 https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732304270837 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732304270837
Bowker Natilene, Tuffin Keith (2004) Using the Online Medium for Discursive Research About People with Disabilities. „Social Science Computer Review”, vol. 22(2), s. 228–241 https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439303262561 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439303262561
Braun Virginia, Clarke Victoria, Boulton Elicia, Davey Louise, McEvoy Charlotte (2020) The online survey as a qualitative research tool. „International Journal of Social Research Methodology”, vol. 24(6), s. 641–654 https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2020.1805550 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2020.1805550
Clarkson Gail P., Hodgkinson Gerard P. (2007) What can occupational stress diaries achieve that questionnaires can’t? „Personnel Review”, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 684–700 https://doi.org/10.1108/00483480710773990 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/00483480710773990
Corti Louise (1993) Using Diaries in Social Research. Surrey: University of Surrey.
Crivello Gina, Favara Marta (2021) COVID-19 and the ‘ethics of disruption’: Current dilemmas facing longitudinal research in low- and middle-income countries. „Methodological Innovations”, vol. 14(1), s. 1–5 https://doi.org/10.1177/2059799121994223 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2059799121994223
Crozier Sarah E., Cassell Catherine M. (2016) Methodological considerations in the use of audio diaries in work psychology: Adding to the qualitative toolkit. „Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology”, vol. 89(2), s. 396–419 https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12132 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12132
Crystal David (2001) Language and the Internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dewe Philip J., O’Driscoll Michael P., Cooper Cary (2010) Coping with Work Stress: A Review and Critique. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470711712 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470711712
Dillman Don A. (2007) Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
East Leah, Jackson Debra, O’Brien Louise, Peters Kathleen (2008) The benefits of computer-mediated communication in nursing research. „Contemporary Nurse”, vol. 30, s. 83–88 https://doi.org/10.5172/conu.673.30.1.83 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5172/conu.673.30.1.83
Ellis Carolyn (2007) Telling Secrets, Revealing Lives: Relational Ethics in Research with Intimate Others. „Qualitative Inquiry”, vol. 13(1), s. 3–29 https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800406294947 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800406294947
Głowacka Maja, Helak Monika, Kościńska Justyna (2020) Konkurs „Pamiętniki Pandemii”. Założenia, wyniki, wstępne refleksje. „Autobiografia Literatura Kultura Media”, vol. 15, s. 227–242 https://doi.org/10.18276/au.2020.2.15-17 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18276/au.2020.2.15-17
Hall Johanna, Gaved Mark, Sargent Julia (2021) Participatory Research Approaches in Times of Covid-19: A Narrative Literature Review. „International Journal of Qualitative Methods”, vol. 20, s. 1–15 https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211010087 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211010087
Hardy James (2006) Speaking clearly: A critical review of the self-talk literature. „Psychology of Sport and Exercise”, vol. 7(2), s. 81–97 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2005.04.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2005.04.002
Hermanowicz Joseph C. (2013) The Longitudinal Qualitative Interview. „Qualitative Sociology”, vol. 36, s. 189–208 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-013-9247-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-013-9247-7
Howlett Marnie (2021) Looking at the ‘field’ through a Zoom lens: Methodological reflections on conducting online research during a global pandemic. „Qualitative Research”, s. 1–16 https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794120985691 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794120985691
Hughes J. (red.) (2012) SAGE Internet Research Methods. Internet-based Interviewing. London: SAGE Publications Ltd. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446268513 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446263327
James Nalita, Busher Hugh (2006) Credibility, authenticity and voice: Dilemmas in online interviewing. „Qualitative Research”, vol. 6(3), s. 403–420 https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794106065010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794106065010
Jankowski Nicholas W., Selm M. van (2005) Epilogue: Methodological concerns and innovations in internet research [w:] Christine Hine, red., Virtual methods: Issues in Social Research on the Internet. Oxford: Berg, s. 199–207.
Joinson Adam N. (2005) Internet behaviour and the design of virtual methods [w:] Christine Hine, red., Virtual methods: Issues in Social Research on the Internet. Oxford: Berg, s. 21–34.
Kilkey Majella, Ryan Louise (2021) Unsettling Events: Understanding Migrants’ Responses to Geopolitical Transformative Episodes through a Life-Course Lens. “International Migration Review”, vol. 55(1), s. 227–253 https://doi.org/10.1177/0197918320905507 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0197918320905507
Kołtan Jacek (2020) Świat wysokich prędkości i teoria krytyczna Hartmuta Rosa [w:] Hartmut Rosa, red., Przyspieszenie, wyobcowanie, rezonans. Gdańsk: Europejskie Centrum Solidarności, s. 7–19.
Lawrence Leigh (2020) Conducting cross-cultural qualitative interviews with mainland Chinese participants during COVID: Lessons from the field. „Qualitative Research”, vol. 22(1), s. 154–165 https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794120974157 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794120974157
Lobe Bojana, Morgan David, Hoffman Kim A. (2020) Qualitative Data Collection in an Era of Social Distancing. „International Journal of Qualitative Methods”, vol. 19, s. 1–8 https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920937875 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920937875
Markham Tim, Couldry Nick (2007) Tracking the Reflexivity of the (Dis)Engaged Citizen: Some Methodological Reflections. „Qualitative Inquiry”, vol. 13, s. 675–695 https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800407301182 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800407301182
Mazzetti Angela, Blenkinsopp John (2012) Evaluating a visual timeline methodology for appraisal and coping research. „Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology”, vol. 85(4), s. 649–665 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.2012.02060.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.2012.02060.x
McCoy Lauren K. (2017) Longitudinal qualitative research and interpretative phenomenological analysis: Philosophical connections and practical considerations. „Qualitative Research in Psychology”, vol. 14(4), s. 442–458 https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2017.1340530 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2017.1340530
Meho Lokman I. (2006) E-mail interviewing in qualitative research: A methodological discussion. „Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology”, vol. 57(10), s. 1284–1295 https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20416 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20416
Menard Scott (2002) Longitudinal Research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412984867 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412984867
Meskell Paulina, Houghton Catherine, Biesty Linda (2021) Opening Windows Behind Closed Doors: Reflections on Working Qualitatively During a Pandemic. „International Journal of Qualitative Methods”, vol. 20, s. 1–4 https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211008313 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211008313
Monrouxe Lynn V. (2009) Solicited audio diaries in longitudinal narrative research: A view from inside. „Qualitative Research”, vol. 9(1), s. 81–103 https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794108098032 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794108098032
Neale Bren (2019) Qualitative Longitudinal Research: Research Methods. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350188983
O’Connor Henrietta, Madge Clare (2001) Cyber-Mothers: Online Synchronous Interviewing using Conferencing Software. „Sociological Research Online”, vol. 5(4), s. 102–117 https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.543 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.543
Pennebaker James W., Seagal Janel D. (1999) Forming a story: The health benefits of narrative. „Journal of Clinical Psychology”, vol. 55(10), s. 1243–1254 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4679(199910)55:10<1243::AID-JCLP6>3.0.CO;2-N DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4679(199910)55:10<1243::AID-JCLP6>3.0.CO;2-N
Pennebaker James W., Smyth Joshua M. (2018) Terapia przez pisanie. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
Radzińska Jowita, Pustułka Paula (2021) A Win for the Middle Class? A Qualitative Study Mapping „Benefits” from the National Quarantine. „Kultura i Społeczeństwo”, t. 65, nr 1, s. 43–63 https://doi.org/10.35757/KiS.2021.65.1.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35757/KiS.2021.65.1.1
Ratislavová Kateřina, Ratislav Jakub (2014) Asynchronous email interview as a qualitative research method in the humanities. „Human Affairs”, vol. 24(4), s. 452–460 https://doi.org/10.2478/s13374-014-0240-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s13374-014-0240-y
Roberts J. Kessa, Pavlakis Alexandra E., Richards Meredith P. (2021) It’s More Complicated Than It Seems: Virtual Qualitative Research in the COVID-19 Era. „International Journal of Qualitative Methods”, vol. 20, s. 1–13 https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211002959 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211002959
Rosa Hartmut (2020) Przyspieszenie, wyobcowanie, rezonans. Przełożyli Jakub Duraj i Jacek Kołtan. Gdańsk: Europejskie Centrum Solidarności.
Sanders Teela (2005) Researching the online sex community [w:] Christine Hine, red., Virtual Methods: Issues in Social Research on the Internet. Oxford: Berg, s. 67–79.
Stanley Liz (1993) On Auto/Biography in Sociology. „Sociology”, vol. 27(1), s. 41–52 https://doi.org/10.1177/003803859302700105 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/003803859302700105
Surmiak Adrianna, Bielska Beata, Kalinowska Katarzyna (2022) Social Researchers’ Approaches to Research Ethics During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Exploratory Study. „Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics”, vol. 17(1–2), s. 213–222 https://doi.org/10.1177/15562646211055056 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/15562646211055056
Swenson Geoffrey, Roll Kate (2020) Theorizing Risk and Research: Methodological Constraints and Their Consequences. „PS: Political Science and Politics”, vol. 53(2), s. 286–291 https://doi.org/10.1017/S104909651900177X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S104909651900177X
Thurlow Crispin, Lengel Laura, Tomic Alice (2004) Computer-Mediated Communication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Tremblay Stephanie, Castiglione Sonia, Audet Li-Anne, Desmarais Michèle, Horace Minnie, Peláez Sandra (2021) Conducting Qualitative Research to Respond to COVID-19 Challenges: Reflections for the Present and Beyond. „International Journal of Qualitative Methods”, vol. 20, s. 1–8 https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211009679 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211009679
Uliński Maciej (2012) Etyka troski i jej pogranicza. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Aureus.
Valdez Elizabeth Salerno, Gubrium Aline (2020) Shifting to Virtual CBPR Protocols in the Time of Coronavirus/COVID-19. „International Journal of Qualitative Methods”, vol. 19, s. 1–9 https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920977315 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920977315
Vindrola-Padros Cecilia, Chisnall Georgia, Cooper Silvie, Dowrick Anna, Djellouli Nehla, Mulcahy Symmons Sophie, Martin Sam, Singleton Georgina, Vanderslott Samantha, Vera Norha, Johnson Ginger A. (2020) Carrying out Rapid Qualitative Research During a Pandemic: Emerging Lessons from COVID-19. „Qualitative Health Research”, vol. 30(14), s. 2102–2204 https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732320951526 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732320951526
Ward Stephen (1999) Requirements for an Effective Project Risk Management Process. „Project Management Journal”, vol. 30, s. 37–43 https://doi.org/10.1177/875697289903000306 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/875697289903000306
Opublikowane
Numer
Dział
Licencja
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
Jak cytować
