Tools of the game. Qualitative digital methodologies for the e-sports research

Marcin Zaród

doi:10.18778/1733-8069.17.1.03

Authors

Marcin Zaród Digital Sociology Working Group / University of Warsaw https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3005-286X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8069.17.1.03

Keywords:

sociology of sport, e-sport research, ethnography, netnography, digital sociology

Abstract

This article adopts methodology from digital qualitative studies in order to discuss issues specific to e-sport research in the sociology of sport. The applied concepts are built on a critical discussion of the existing theories and cases from the author’s fieldwork on e-sports among hackers. The employed theories and methods are taken from virtual ethnography, netnography, and digital ethnography. These approaches are discussed critically, especially regarding their relations with Science and Technology Studies and Communication and Media Studies.

The paper advocates acknowledging the cognitive approach from virtual ethnography, while dropping the approach to virtuality in favor of other theories of spatiality, with the theory of infrastructure as the backbone. It discusses the usability of Kozinets’ netnographical genres and their potential differences, but proposes a more practical solution to autonetnography. Finally, it shows how different frameworks in digital ethnography can be used in the context of e-sport research. The last part of the article is devoted to some practical advice based on discussions and practice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Marcin Zaród, Digital Sociology Working Group / University of Warsaw

Marcin Zaród, PhD, a sociologist of science, formerly a physicist. He specializes in the constructivist approach and studies of the social aspects of computer security. He did ethnographies among hackers, CTFers, and roboticists. Personally, he likes puzzles, cats, board games, and social justice.

References

Abanazir, Cem. 2018. “Institutionalisation in E-Sports.” Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 13(2):117-131.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17511321.2018.1453538

Alač, Morana. 2020. “Beyond Intersubjectivity in Olfactory Psychophysics I: Troubles with the Subject.” Social Studies of Science 50(3):440-473.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312720915645

Beverungen, Armin, Steffen Böhm, and Chris Land. 2015. “Free Labour, Social Media, Management: Challenging Marxist Organization Studies.” Organization Studies 36(4):473-489.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840614561568

Boellstorff, Tom et al. 2012. Ethnography and Virtual Worlds: A Handbook of Method. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.cttq9s20

Caliandro, Alessandro. 2017. “Digital Methods for Ethnography: Analytical Concepts for Ethnographers Exploring Social Media Environments.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 24(3):270-298.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241617702960

Coleman, E. Gabriella. 2010. “The Hacker Conference: A Ritual Condensation and Celebration of a Lifeworld.” Anthropological Quarterly 83(1):47-72.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/anq.0.0112

Collins, Harry, Robert Evans, and Michael E. Gorman. 2010. “Trading Zones and Interactional Expertise.” Pp. 7-22 in Trading Zones and Interactional Expertise, edited by M. E. Gorman. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262014724.003.0002

Costello, Leesa, Marie-Louise McDermott, and Ruth Wallace. 2017. “Netnography: Range of Practices, Misperceptions, and Missed Opportunities.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 16(1).
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917700647

Darmas, Marcin. 2019. Na dystans. Rozważania socjologiczne o boksie. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.31338/uw.9788323539605

Dourish, Paul. 2017. The Stuff of Bits. An Essay on the Materialities of Information. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/10999.001.0001

Escobar, Arturo. 1994. “Welcome to Cyberia: Notes on the Anthropology of Cyberculture.” Current Anthropology 35(3):211-231.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/204266

Guttmann, Allen. 2012. From Ritual to Record: The Nature of Modern Sports. New York: Columbia University Press.
Google Scholar

Haraway, Donna. 1987. “A Manifesto for Cyborgs: Science, Technology, and Socialist Feminism in the 1980s.” Australian Feminist Studies 2(4):1-42.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08164649.1987.9961538

Hine, Christine. 2000. Virtual Ethnography. London, UK/Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857020277

Hine, Christine. 2015. Ethnography for the Internet: Embedded, Embodied and Everyday. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
Google Scholar

Hoeber, Larena and Shannon Kerwin. 2013. “Exploring the Experiences of Female Sport Fans: A Collaborative Self-Ethnography.” Sport Management Review 16(3):326-336.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2012.12.002

Ignatow, Gabe. 2020. Sociological Theory in the Digital Age. Abingdon, UK/New York, NY: Routledge.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429292804

Jakubowska, Honorata. 2017. Skill Transmission, Sport and Tacit Knowledge: A Sociological Perspective. Milton: Taylor & Francis.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315267043

Jemielniak, Dariusz. 2018. “Socjologia 2.0. O potrzebie łączenia big data z etnografią cyfrową, wyzwaniach jakościowej socjologii cyfrowej i systematyzacji pojęć.” Studia Socjologiczne 2(229):7-29.
Google Scholar

Knorr Cetina, Karin. 1999. Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences make Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674039681

Kossakowski, Radosław, Przemysła Nosal, and Wojciech Woźniak. 2020. Politics, Ideology and Football Fandom: The Transformation of Modern Poland. Abingdon, UK/New York, NY: Routledge.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429325885

Kozinets, Robert V. 2011. Netnography. Doing Ethnographic Research Online. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
Google Scholar

Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar

Latour, Bruno. 1999. Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar

Latour, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford, UK/New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Leigh Star, Susan. 1999. “The Ethnography of Infrastructure.” American Behavioral Scientist 43(3):377-391.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00027649921955326

Leigh Star, Susan and James R. Griesemer. 1989. “Institutional Ecology, ‘Translations’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39.” Social Studies of Science 19(3):387-420.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/030631289019003001

Muntanyola-Saura, Dafne and Raúl Sánchez-García. 2018. “Distributed Attention: A Cognitive Ethnography of Instruction in Sport Settings.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 48(4):433-454.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12183

Næss, Hans Erik. 2017. “Authenticity Matters: A Digital Ethnography of FIA World Rally Championship Fan Forums.” Sport Management Review 20(1):105-113.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2016.08.001

Pink, Sarah et al. 2016. Digital Ethnography: Principles and Practice. Los Angeles, CA/London, UK/New Delhi/Singapore/Washington, DC: SAGE.
Google Scholar

Reitman, Jason G. et al. 2020. “Esports Research: A Literature Review.” Games and Culture 15(1):32-50.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412019840892

Schimmel, Kimberly S. 2017. “Not an ‘Extraordinary Event’: NFL Games and Militarized Civic Ritual.” Sociology of Sport Journal 34(1):79-89.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1123/ssj.2016-0172

Schmidt, Steffen C. E. et al. 2020. “The Influence of Cortisol, Flow, and Anxiety on Performance in E-Sports: A Field Study.” BioMed Research International 2020(2):1-6.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/9651245

Seippel, Ørnulf. 2018. “Topics and Trends: 30 Years of Sociology of Sport.” European Journal for Sport and Society 15(3):288-307.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/16138171.2018.1475098

Smith, Lauren Reichart and Jimmy Sanderson. 2015. “I’m Going to Instagram It! An Analysis of Athlete Self-Presentation on Instagram.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 59(2):342-358.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2015.1029125

Soderberg, Johan. 2013. “Determining Social Change: The Role of Technological Determinism in the Collective Action Framing of Hackers.” New Media & Society 15(8):1277-1293.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812470093

Strathern, Marilyn. 1999. Property, Substance and Effect: Anthropological Essays on Persons and Things. London, UK/New Brunswick, NJ: Athlone Press.
Google Scholar

Szablewicz, Marcella. 2016. “A Realm of Mere Representation? ‘Live’ E-Sports Spectacles and the Crafting of China’s Digital Gaming Image.” Games and Culture 11(3):256-274.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412015595298

Uva, Domenico. 2018. Competing Online: A Netnographic Study on Twitch Influencers. Sao Paolo: Escola De Administracao de Empresas.
Google Scholar

Vertesi, Janet, David Ribes, and Carl DiSalvo, eds. 2019. DigitalSTS: A Field Guide for Science & Technology Studies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvc77mp9

Zaród, Marcin. 2018. Aktorzy-Sieci w kolektywach hakerskich. Doctoral dissertation. Uniwersytet Warszawski, Warsaw. Wydział Filozofii i Socjologii. Retrieved January 13, 2021 http://depotuw.ceon.pl/handle/item/2909
Google Scholar