“Follow the Dog”: Using the Go-Along Method in Research on Training and Working with Guide Dogs for People with Visual Impairment

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8069.20.2.04

Keywords:

guide dogs, visual impairment, disability studies, animal studies, go-along method

Abstract

Training and working with a guide dog both take place largely on the move, in public spaces, on the way to the next destination. Trainers, puppy raisers, and visually impaired handlers travel many miles with the dog, learning about each other and interacting with various elements of the environment. The go-along method – used by sociologists, ethnographers, and geographers studying the interdependence of movement, space, perception, daily practices, and strategies – creates an opportunity to understand the dynamics of such interspecies cooperation. It has proved particularly useful in the ethnographic project focusing on different stages of training guide dogs and visually impaired handlers, as well as their verbal and non-verbal communication. Besides the substantive benefits of applying the go-along method, this article also discusses premises, practicalities, and limitations associated with go-alongs, including the dilemmas related to data recording and presentation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Kamil Pietrowiak, University of Gdańsk, Poland

PhD, ethnographer, cultural anthropologist. He works at the Institute of Anthropology, University of Gdańsk. His research interests are related to disability studies, especially perspectives of visually impaired people, methodology, and the ethics of qualitative research. He conducts various workshops concerning senses, disability, and integration. He participates in non-academic research for cultural institutions, NGOs, and companies.

References

Adekoya Adebusola A., Guse Lorna (2020), Walking Interviews and Wandering Behavior: Ethical Insights and Methodological Outcomes While Exploring the Perspectives of Older Adults Living With Dementia, “International Journal of Qualitative Methods”, vol. 19, pp. 1–6, https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920920135
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920920135

Anderson Jon (2004), Talking Whilst Walking: A Geographical Archaeology of Knowledge, “Area”, vol. 36(3), pp. 254–261.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0004-0894.2004.00222.x

Bane Christie (2021), Forward Together: An Inside Look at Guide Dog Training, Las Vegas: ‎Independently Published.
Google Scholar

Bartlett Ruth, Koncul Ana, Lid Inger Marie, George Elizabeth Onyedikachi, Haugen Ingebjørg (2023), Using Walking/Go Along Interviews With People in Vulnerable Situations: A Synthesized Review of the Research Literature, “International Journal of Qualitative Methods”, vol. 22, pp. 1–14, https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231164606
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231164606

Bates Charlotte, Rhys-Taylor Alex (2017), Finding Our Feet, [in:] C. Bates, A. Rhys-Taylor (eds.), Walking through social research, New York–London: Routledge, pp. 1–11.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315561547-1

Battista Geoffrey A., Manaugh Kevin (2017), Using Embodied Videos of Walking Interviews in Walkability Assessment, “Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board”, vol. 2661(1), pp. 12–18, https://doi.org/10.3141/2661-02
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3141/2661-02

Bell Sarah L., Bush Tanvir N. (2021), ‘Never mind the bullocks’: animating the go-along interview through creative nonfiction, “Mobilities”, vol. 16(3), pp. 306–321, https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2020.1817685
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2020.1817685

Bergeron Julie, Paquette Sylvain, Poullaouec-Gonidec Philippe (2014), Uncovering landscape values and micro-geographies of meanings with the go-along method, “Landscape and Urban Planning”, vol. 122, pp. 108–121, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.11.009
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.11.009

Blewett Jessica, Hanlon Neil (2016), Disablement as inveterate condition: Living with habitual ableism in Prince George, British Columbia: Disablement in Prince George, “The Canadian Geographer/Le Géographecanadien”, vol. 60(1), pp. 46–55, https://doi.org/10.1111/cag.12254
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cag.12254

Bohan Danial Bin, Tuck Wah James Chan (2015), Mobility of a guide dog team in Singapore: A case study, “British Journal of Visual Impairment”, vol. 33(1), pp. 54–65, https://doi.org/10.1177/0264619614561691
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0264619614561691

Butler Mary, Derrett Sarah (2014), The Walking Interview: An Ethnographic Approach to Understanding Disability, “Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice”, vol. 12(3), 6, https://nsuworks.nova.edu/ijahsp/vol12/iss3/6/ (accessed: 15.01.2022).
Google Scholar

Büscher Monika, Urry John (2009), Mobile Methods and the Empirical, “European Journal of Social Theory”, vol. 12(1), pp. 99–116, https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431008099642
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431008099642

Carpiano Richard M. (2009), Come take a walk with me: The “Go-Along” interview as a novel method for studying the implications of place for health and well-being, “Health & Place”, vol. 15(1), pp. 263–272, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2008.05.003
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2008.05.003

Castrodale Mark Anthony (2018), Mobilizing Dis/Ability Research: A Critical Discussion of Qualitative Go-Along Interviews in Practice, “Qualitative Inquiry”, vol. 24(1), pp. 45–55, https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800417727765
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800417727765

Clark Andrew (2017), Walking Together: Understanding Young People’s Experiences of Living in Neighbourhoods in Transition, [in:] C. Bates, A. Rhys-Taylor (eds.), Walking through social research, New York–London: Routledge, pp. 87–103.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315561547-7

Coren Stanley (2000), How to Speak Dog: Mastering the Art of Dog-Human Communication, New York: Free Press.
Google Scholar

Curtis Sarah Anne (2017), Human-Animal Relations. Agency, Inter-dependence, and Emotion between Humans and Assistance Dogs, Adelaide: University of Adelaide, School of Social Sciences, PhD thesis, https://digital.library.adelaide.edu.au/dspace/bitstream/2440/119195/1/Curtis2017_PhD.pdf (accessed: 1.10.2022).
Google Scholar

Czarniawska Barbara (2007), Shadowing and Other Techniques for Doing Fieldwork in Modern Societies, Malmö–Oslo: Liber Universitetsforl.
Google Scholar

Donaldson Jean (2013), The Culture Clash, Wenatchee: The Academy for Dog Trainers.
Google Scholar

Due Brian (2023), Interspecies intercorporeality and mediated haptic sociality: distributing perception with a guide dog, “Visual Studies”, vol. 38(1), pp. 3–16, https://doi.org/10.1080/1472586X.2021.1951620
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1472586X.2021.1951620

Due Brian, Bierring Lange Simon (2018), The Moses Effect: The Spatial Hierarchy and Joint Accomplishment of a Blind Person Navigating, “Space and Culture”, vol. 21(2), pp. 129–144, https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331217734541
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331217734541

Due Brian, Bierring Lange Simon (2019), Troublesome Objects: Unpacking Ocular-Centrism in Urban Environments by Studying Blind Navigation Using Video Ethnography and Ethnomethodology, “Sociological Research Online”, vol. 24(4), pp. 475–495, https://doi.org/10.1177/1360780418811963
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1360780418811963

Due Brian, Lange Simon (2018), Semiotic resources for navigation: A video ethnographic study of blind people’s uses of the white cane and a guide dog for navigating in urban areas, “Semiotica”, vol. 222, pp. 287–312, https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2016-0196
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2016-0196

Duedahl Eva, Stilling Blichfeldt Bodil (2020), To walk the talk of go-along methods: navigating the unknown terrains of being-along, “Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism”, vol. 20(5), pp. 438–458, https://doi.org/10.1080/15022250.2020.1766560
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15022250.2020.1766560

Evans James, Jones Phil (2011), The walking interview: Methodology, mobility and place, “Applied Geography”, vol. 31(2), pp. 849–858, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.09.005
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.09.005

Garcia Carolyn M., Eisenberg Marla E., Frerich Ellen A., Lechner Kate E., Lust Katherine (2012), Conducting Go-Along Interviews to Understand Context and Promote Health, “Qualitative Health Research”, vol. 22(10), pp. 1395–1403, https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732312452936
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732312452936

Hammer Gili (2019), Blindness through the Looking Glass: The Performance of Blindness, Gender, and the Sensory Body, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.9271356

Hein Jane Ricketts, Evans James, Jones Phil (2008), Mobile Methodologies: Theory, Technology and Practice, “Geography Compass”, vol. 2(5), pp. 1266–1285, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8198.2008.00139.x
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8198.2008.00139.x

Horowitz Alexandra (2009), Inside of a Dog: What Dogs See, Smell, and Know, New York: Scribner.
Google Scholar

Ingold Tim (1994), Introduction, [in:] T. Ingold (ed.), What is an animal?, London: Routledge, pp. 1–16.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-85617-198-4.50004-7

Ingold Tim (2011), Being Alive: Essays on Movement, Knowledge and Description, London: Routledge.
Google Scholar

Ittyerah Miriam, Gaunet Florence (2009), The response of guide dogs and pet dogs (Canis Familiaris) to cues of human referential communication (pointing and gaze), “Animal Cognition”, vol. 12(2), pp. 257–265, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-008-0188-6
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-008-0188-6

Koski Leena, Bäcklund Pia (2017), Whose Agency? Humans and Dogs in Training, [in:] T. Räsänen, T. Syrjämaa (eds.), Shared lives of humans and animals: animal agency in the global North, London–New York: Routledge, pp. 11–23.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315228761-3

Kuckartz Udo, Rädiker Stefan (2019), Analyzing Qualitative Data with MAXQDA: Text, Audio, and Video, Cham: Springer.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15671-8

Kusenbach Margarethe (2003), Street Phenomenology: The Go-Along as Ethnographic Research Tool, “Ethnography”, vol. 4(3), pp. 455–485, https://doi.org/10.1177/146613810343007
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/146613810343007

Larsen Jonas, Urry John, Axhausen Kay (2006), Mobilities, Networks, Geographies, Aldershot: Ashgate.
Google Scholar

Lestel Dominique (2015), Myśleć sierścią. Zwierzęcość w perspektywie drugoosobowej, translated Anastazja Dwulit, [in:] A. Barcz, D. Łagodzka (eds.), Zwierzęta i ich ludzie: zmierzch antropocentrycznego paradygmatu, Warszawa: Instytut Badań Literackich PAN, pp. 17–33.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/books.iblpan.5573

Lieberman Lauren J., Haibach-Beach Pamela S., Sherwood Jenna, Trad Alyssa (2019), “We now fly”: Perspectives of adults who are blind with guide dogs trained for running, “British Journal of Visual Impairment”, vol. 37(3), pp. 213–226, https://doi.org/10.1177/0264619619842989
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0264619619842989

Lynch Jonathan, Mannion Greg (2016), Enacting a place-responsive research methodology: walking interviews with educators, “Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning”, vol. 16(4), pp. 330–345, https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2016.1163271
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2016.1163271

Macpherson Hannah (2009), Articulating Blind Touch: Thinking through the Feet, “The Senses and Society”, vol. 4(2), pp. 179–193, https://doi.org/10.2752/174589309X425120
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2752/174589309X425120

Macpherson Hannah (2016), Walking methods in landscape research: moving bodies, spaces of disclosure and rapport, “Landscape Research”, vol. 41(4), pp. 425–432, https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2016.1156065
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2016.1156065

Macpherson Hannah (2017), Walkers with visual-impairments in the British countryside: Picturesque legacies, collective enjoyments and well-being benefits, “Journal of Rural Studies”, vol. 51, pp. 251–258, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.10.001
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.10.001

Magnus Riin (2014), The Function, Formation and Development of Signs in the Guide Dog Team’s Work, “Biosemiotics”, vol. 7(3), pp. 447–463, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-014-9199-7
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-014-9199-7

Magnus Riin (2016), The Semiotic Challenges of Guide Dog Teams: The Experiences of German, Estonian and Swedish Guide Dog Users, “Biosemiotics”, vol. 9(2), pp. 267–285, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-015-9233-4
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-015-9233-4

Marcotte Justine, Grandisson Marie, Milot Élise, Dupéré Sophie (2022), The Walking Interview: A Promising Method for Promoting the Participation of Autistic People in Research Projects, “International Journal of Qualitative Methods”, vol. 21, pp. 1–11, https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221090065
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221090065

Meijer Eva (2019), When Animals Speak: Toward an Interspecies Democracy, New York: New York University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479859351.001.0001

Michalko Rod (1999), The Two-in-One: Walking with Smokie, Walking with Blindness, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Google Scholar

Modlin Susan J. (2000), Service Dogs as Interventions: State of the Science, “Rehabilitation Nursing”, vol. 25(6), pp. 212–219, https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2048-7940.2000.tb01914.x
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2048-7940.2000.tb01914.x

Naderi Szima, Miklósi Ádam, Dóka Antal, Csányi Vilmos (2001), Co-operative interactions between blind persons and their dogs, “Applied Animal Behaviour Science”, vol. 74(1), pp. 59–80, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(01)00152-6
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(01)00152-6

Neal Sarah, Bennett Katy, Jones Hannah, Cochrane Allan, Mohan Giles (2015), Multiculture and Public Parks: Researching Super‐diversity and Attachment in Public Green Space, “Population, Space and Place”, vol. 21(5), pp. 463–475, https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.1910
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.1910

O’Neill Maggie (2018), Walking, Well-Being and Community: Racialized Mothers Building Cultural Citizenship Using Participatory Arts and Participatory Action Research, “Ethnic and Racial Studies”, vol. 41(1), pp. 73–97.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2017.1313439

Parent Laurence (2016), The wheeling interview: mobile methods and disability, “Mobilities”, vol. 11(4), pp. 521–532, https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2016.1211820
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2016.1211820

Pink Sarah (2007), Walking with video, “Visual Studies”, vol. 22(3), pp. 240–252, https://doi.org/10.1080/14725860701657142
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14725860701657142

Porkertová Hana (2020), Reconfiguring Human and Nonhuman Animals in a Guiding Assemblage. Toward Posthumanist Conception of Disability, [in:] S. Karkulehto, A.-K. Koistinen, E. Varis (eds.), Reconfiguring human, nonhuman and posthuman in literature and culture, New York: Routledge, pp. 182–200.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429243042-10

Poser Anitavon, Willamowski Edda (2020), The Power of Shared Embodiment: Renegotiating Non/Belonging and In/Exclusion in an Ephemeral Community of Care, “Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry”, vol. 44(4), pp. 610–628, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11013-020-09675-5
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11013-020-09675-5

Quinlan Elizabeth (2008), Conspicuous Invisibility: Shadowing as a Data Collection Strategy, “Qualitative Inquiry”, vol. 14(8), pp. 1480–1499, https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800408318318
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800408318318

Reed Edward S. (1994), The Affordances of the Animate Environment: Social Science from the Ecological Point of View, [in:] T. Ingold (ed.), What is an animal?, London: Routledge, pp. 110–126.
Google Scholar

Rogowski Łukasz (2016), Wideozwiedzanie. Badania miasta w perspektywie paradygmatu mobilności, „Kultura i Społeczeństwo”, vol. 60(2), pp. 123–144, https://doi.org/10.35757/KiS.2016.60.2.8
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.35757/KiS.2016.60.2.8

Sanders Clinton R. (1999), Understanding dogs: living and working with canine companions, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Google Scholar

Sanders Clinton R. (2000), The Impact of Guide Dogs on the Identity of People with Visual Impairments, “Anthrozoös”, vol. 13(3), pp. 131–139, https://doi.org/10.2752/089279300786999815
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2752/089279300786999815

Sheller Mimi, Urry John (2006), The New Mobilities Paradigm, “Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space”, vol. 38(2), pp. 207–226, https://doi.org/10.1068/a37268
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/a37268

Sirris Stephen, Lindheim Tone, Askeland Harald (2022), Observation and Shadowing: Two Methods to Research Values and Values Work in Organisations and Leadership, [in:] G. Espedal, B. Jelstad Løvaas, S. Sirris, A. Wæraas (eds.), Researching Values: Methodological Approaches for Understanding Values Work in Organisations and Leadership, Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 133–151.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90769-3_8

Spinney Justin (2011), A Chance to Catch a Breath: Using Mobile Video Ethnography in Cycling Research, “Mobilities”, vol. 6(2), pp. 161–182, https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2011.552771
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2011.552771

Surmiak Adrianna (2022), Etyka badań jakościowych w praktyce. Analiza doświadczeń badaczy w badaniach z osobami podatnymi na zranienie, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
Google Scholar

Thompson Claire, Reynolds Joanna (2019), Reflections on the go‐along: How “disruptions” can illuminate the relationships of health, place and practice, “The Geographical Journal”, vol. 185(2), pp. 156–167, https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12285
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12285

Uexküll Jakob von (2010), A Foray into the Worlds of Animals and Humans: With A Theory of Meaning, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Google Scholar

Urry John (2000), Sociology beyond Societies: Mobilities for the Twenty First Century, London: Routledge.
Google Scholar

Vainini Phillip, Vannini April (2017), Wild Walking. A Twofold Critique of the Walk-Along Method, [in:] C. Bates, A. Rhys-Taylor (eds.), Walking through social research, New York–London: Routledge, pp. 179–195.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315561547-12

Wästerfors David (2021), Required to be creative. Everyday ways for dealing with inaccessibility, “Disability & Society”, vol. 36(2), pp. 265–285, https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2020.1720610
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2020.1720610

Wegerif Marc C.A. (2019), The ride-along: a journey in qualitative research, “Qualitative Research Journal”, vol. 19(2), pp. 121–131, https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-D-18-00038
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-D-18-00038

Weil Kari (2012), Thinking Animals: Why Animal Studies Now?, New York: Columbia University Press.
Google Scholar

Wiggett-Barnard Cindy, Steel Henry (2008), The experience of owning a guide dog, “Disability and Rehabilitation”, vol. 30(14), pp. 1014–1026, https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280701466517
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280701466517

Włodarczyk Justyna (2018), Genealogy of Obedience: Reading North American Dog Training Literature, 1850s–2000s, Boston: Brill.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004380295

Woods Tania (1994), Guide Dogs as Eyes and Companions of Blind People, “Medische Antropologie”, vol. 6(1), pp. 85–107.
Google Scholar

York Sarah, Whiteside Helen (2018), Exploring Social (Non-working) Behavior in Guide Dogs from the Perspective of Guide Dog Owners, “Anthrozoös”, vol. 31(5), pp. 525–536, https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2018.1505259
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2018.1505259

Downloads

Published

2024-05-31

How to Cite

Pietrowiak, K. (2024). “Follow the Dog”: Using the Go-Along Method in Research on Training and Working with Guide Dogs for People with Visual Impairment. Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej, 20(2), 62–89. https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8069.20.2.04

Issue

Section

Numer tematyczny „Badania jakościowe – metody, współuczestnicy, proces realizacji” pod redakcją Izabeli Ślęzak

Funding data