Lawyering in Transition. Post-Socialist Transformations in Autobiographical Narratives of Polish and Russian Lawyers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8069.12.2.08Keywords:
Post-Socialist Transformation, Legal Professions, Biographic Research, Poland, RussiaAbstract
This paper presents preliminary findings on memories from the period of post-socialist transformation and on related narrative constructs of agency in autobiographical interviews with practicing lawyers from Poland and Russia. The study is based on 25 interviews with individuals born in the late-1930s, 1940s and 1950s. Six different types of narrative accounts about the period of post-socialist transformations are identified and described: (i) trailblazer narratives; (ii) follower narratives; (iii) narratives of volatility; (iv) narratives of continuity; (v) latecomer narratives and (vi) narratives of social decay.
Downloads
References
Antkowiak, Paweł. 2012. Samorząd zawodowy w Polsce. Warszawa, Poznań: Dom Wydawniczy Elipsa.
Google Scholar
Berman, Harold J. 1992. “The Rule of Law and the Law-Based State (Rechtsstaat). With Special Reference to the Soviet Union.” Pp. 43-60 in Toward the “Rule of Law” in Russia? Political and Legal Reform in the Transition Period, edited by D. D. Barry. Armonk, NY, London: M. E. Sharpe.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315486451-4
Blumer, Herbert. 1998. Symbolic Interactionism. Perspective and Method.
Google Scholar
Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.
Google Scholar
Bohnsack, Ralf. 2010. “Documentary Method and Group Discussions.” Pp. 99-124 in Qualitative Analysis and Documentary Method in International Education Research, edited by R. Bohnsack, N. Pfaff, and W. Weller. Opladen, Farmington Hills, MI: Barbara Budrich Publishers.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3224/86649236
Charmaz, Kathy C. 2006. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
Domecka, Markieta and Adam Mrozowicki. 2008. “Robotnicy i ludzie biznesu. Wzory karier zawodowych a zmiana społeczna w Polsce.” Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej 4(1):136-155.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8069.4.1.06
Feldbrugge, Fredinand J.M. 1992. “The Emancipation of Soviet Law: A Foreword.” Pp. xii-xvii in The Emancipation of Soviet Law, edited by F. J.M Feldbrugge. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Google Scholar
Fogelklou, Anders. 1992. “New Legal Thinking in the Soviet Law.” Pp. 3-26 in The Emancipation of Soviet Law, edited by F.J.M Feldbrugge. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Google Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom and Tamir Moustafa, (eds.). 2008. Rule by Law. The Politics of Courts in Authoritarian Regimes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511814822
Glaser, Barney G. and Anselm L. Strauss. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.
Google Scholar
Jordan, Pamela A. 2005. Defending Rights in Russia: Lawyers, the State, and Legal Reform in the Post-Soviet Era. Toronto, Vancouver: UBC Press.
Google Scholar
Kleining, Gerhard. 1982. “Umriss zu einer Methodologie qualitativer Sozialforschung.” Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 34:224-253.
Google Scholar
Kwaśniewicz, Władysław. 2003. “Between a Post-Feudal and a Post-Industrial Model: Polish Society in the 20th Century.” Polish Sociological Review 4(144):387-397.
Google Scholar
Larson, Magali Sarfatti. 1977. The Rise of Professionalism. A Sociological Analysis. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.
Google Scholar
Lityński, Adam. 2005. Historia prawa Polski Ludowej. Warszawa: LexisNexis.
Google Scholar
Lityński, Adam. 2010. Prawo Rosji i ZSRR 1917-1991, czyli historia wszechzwiązkowego komunistycznego prawa (bolszewików). Krótki kurs. Warszawa: C. H. Beck.
Google Scholar
Łojko, Elżbieta, (ed.). 1999. Studenci prawa o swojej przyszłości zawodowej. Wyniki ankiety 1996-1997. Warszawa: Wydział Prawa i Administracji Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.
Google Scholar
Mannheim, Karl. 1952. “On the Analysis of ‘Weltanschauung.’” Pp. 33-83 in Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge (Collected Works, V). London: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Materski, Wojciech and Ryszard Żelichowski, (eds.). 2010. Polska transformacja. Spojrzenie po dwudziestu latach. Warszawa: Instytut Studiów Politycznych PAN.
Google Scholar
Miller, Robert, Robin Humprey, and Elena Zdravomyslova. 2003. “Introduction: Biographical Research and Historical Watersheds.” Pp. 1-24 in Biographical Research in Eastern Europe. Altered Lives and Broken Biographies, edited by R. Humphrey, R. Miller, and E. Zdravomyslova. Hampshire: Ashgate Publishing Company.
Google Scholar
Morison, John and Philip Leith. 1992. The Barrister’s World. And the Nature of Law. Milton Keynes, PA: Open University Press.
Google Scholar
Mrowczynski, Rafael. 2012. “Self-Regulation of Legal Professions in State-Socialism. Poland and Russia Compared.” Rechtsgeschichte 2 0:170-188. R etrieved A ugust 0 7, 2 013 ( http:// data.rg.mpg.de/rechtsgeschichte/rg20_170mrowczynski.pdf).
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12946/rg20/170-188
Mrowczynski, Rafael. 2014. “Rechtsberater in staatssozialistischen und post-sozialistischen Gesellschaften. Ein Vergleich zwischen Polen, der Sowjetunion und dem post-kommunistischen Russland.” Pp. 133-166 in Professionen, Eigentum und Staat. Europäische Entwicklungen im Vergleich – 19. und 20.
Google Scholar
Jahrhundert, edited by D. Müller and H. Siegrist. Göttingen: Wallstein Verlag.
Google Scholar
Mrowczynski, Rafael. in press. “Institutional Professionalization of Lawyers in State-Socialism and Post-Socialism: Poland and Russia Compared.” International Journal of the Legal Profession.
Google Scholar
Mrozowicki, Adam. 2011. Coping With Social Change. Life Strategies of Workers in Poland’s New Capitalism. Leuven: Leuven University Press.
Google Scholar
Nohl, Arnd-Michael. 2009. Interview und dokumentarische Methode: Anleitungen für die Forschungspraxis. 3. Aufl. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91539-5
Parkin, Frank. 2008. “Marxism and Class Theory. A Bourgeois Critique.” Pp. 143-158 in Social Stratification. Class, Race, and Gender in Sociological Perspective, edited by D. B. Grusky. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Google Scholar
Podgorecki, Adam. 1996. “Conclusions.” Pp. 341-357 in Totalitarian and Post-Totalitarian Law, edited by A. Podgorecki and V. Olgiati. Sydney, Singapore, Brookfield, Aldershot: Dartmouth.
Google Scholar
Rosenthal, Gabriele. 2005. “Biographical Research.” Pp. 25-57 in Biographical Research Methods, vol. 3, edited by R. Miller. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage Publications.
Google Scholar
Schütze, Fritz. 1977. Die Technik des narrativen Interviews in Interaktionsfeldstudien – dargestellt an einem Projekt zur Erforschung von kommunalen Machtstrukturen. Bielefeld.
Google Scholar
Schütze, Fritz. 1981. “Prozeßstrukturen des Lebensablaufs.” Pp. 67-156 in Biographie in handlungswissenschaftlicher Perspektive. Kolloquium am Sozialwissenschaftlichen Forschungsinstitut der Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, edited by J. Matthes, A. Pfeifenberger, and M. Stosberg. Nürnberg: Verlag der Nürnberger Forschungsvereinigung.
Google Scholar
Schütze, Fritz. 1983. “Biographieforschung und narratives Interview.” Neue Praxis. Kritische Zeitschrift für Sozialarbeit und Sozialpädagogik 13(3):283-293.
Google Scholar
Schütze, Fritz. 2007. “Biography Analysis on the Empirical Base of Autobiographical Narratives: How to Analyse Autobiographical Narrative Interviews.” Part I in INVITE [Initiate New Ways of Biographical Counseling in Rehabilitative Vocational Training] Biographical Counselling in Rehabilitative Vocational Training, pp. 1-64.
Google Scholar
Sharlet, Robert. 1977. “Stalinism and Soviet Legal Culture.” Pp. 146-179 in Stalinism. Essays in Historical Interpretation, edited by R. C. Tucker. New York, London: W. W. Norton & Company.
Google Scholar
Solomon, Peter H. and Toss S. Foglesong. 2000. Courts and Transition in Russia. The Challenge of Judicial Reform. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Google Scholar
Strauss, Anselm L. and Juliet M. Corbin. 2008 Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Google Scholar
Trubek, David M. and Robert L. Nelson. 1992. “Introduction. New Problems and New Paradigms in Studies of Legal Profession.” Pp. 1-27 in Lawyers’ Ideals / Lawyers’ Practices. Transformations in the American Legal Profession, edited by R. L. Nelson, D. M. Trubek, and R. L. Solomon. Ithaca, London: Cornell University Press.
Google Scholar
Turturica, Cristina. 2006. “Law School Accreditation in the New Independent States of the Former Soviet Union: What Steps for the Future?” International Journal of the Legal Profession 13(2):153-183.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09695950600604133
Wernet, Andreas. 1997. Professioneller Habitus im Recht. Untersuchungen zur Professionalisierungbedürftigkeit der Strafrechtspflege und zum Professionshabitus von Strafverteidigern. Berlin: edition sigma.
Google Scholar
Westen, Klaus. 1988. “Die sozialistischen Rechtsordnungen.” Pp. 221-429 in Einführung in die großen Rechtssysteme der Gegenwart, edited by R. David, C. Jauffret Spinosi, and G. Grassmann. München: C. H. Beck.
Google Scholar
Weyrauch, Walter. 1964. The Personality of Lawyers. A Comparative Study of Subjective Factors in Law, Based on Interviews with German Lawyers. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/000276426400800307
Zaslavsky, Victor. 1995. “Contemporary Russian Society and its Soviet Legacy: The Problem of State-Dependent Workers.” Pp. 45-62 in Social Change and Modernization: Lessons from Eastern Europe, edited by B. Grancelli. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110884470.45
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.