The Creation of the Social Boundaries of Occupation Based on the Example of Physiotherapists in Poland

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8069.21.4.08

Keywords:

labor, work, healthcare, physiotherapy, massage, Weber

Abstract

The article focuses on the initial findings of ongoing research dedicated to the practices of masseurs and physiotherapists. One unique aspect of working in a specific occupation is the social acknowledgement of certain tasks as constituting a distinct job. Establishing the social boundaries of an occupation is an intricate and enduring process. This study focuses on defining the professional standing of physiotherapists by means of official procedures, embedding the field within legal frameworks (legislation from 2015), and forming community structures that safeguard professional limits akin to guilds (the Polish Chamber of Physiotherapists). The mentioned processes were interlinked and generated the formal framework for physiotherapy as an independent medical occupation. In the following study, the authors reconstructed the process of professionalization based on in-depth interviews with experts involved in passing the 2015 bill as well as with active members of the aforementioned Chamber. The study demonstrates how professionalization – defined as the establishment of distinct professional boundaries within subjective worker narratives of similar yet separate job roles – is acknowledged in legal frameworks.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Wiktor Sokół, Univertity of Gdańsk, Poland

PhD student at the Doctoral School of the Faculty of Social Sciences at the University of Gdańsk. His research interests focus on the sociology of work, social and political philosophy, classical sociological theories, and historical sociology.

Bartosz Mika, Univertity of Gdańsk, Poland

Assistant professor at University of Gdańsk, Poland. His scientific interests are focused on classical sociological theories, the sociology of work and economy, and the problem of social inequalities. He is a member of the editorial board of the “Society Register” scientific journal. In addition to teaching sociology, he is an active member of “The Workers’ Initiative” Trade Union and an activist in the field of Social Cooperatives.

References

Alaca Nuray, Karakuş Meryem B., Kocaer Özge, Arslan Dilek Ç. (2024), Occupational perceptions of physiotherapists and physiotherapy students in Turkey: A comparative study, “Work”, vol. 77(1), pp. 219–230.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-220697

Asser L. Antony, Soundararajan K. (2024), The vital role of physiotherapy during COVID-19: A systematic review, “Work”, vol. 70(3), pp. 687–694.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-210450

Burawoy Michael (1998), Extended Case Method, “Sociological Theory”, vol. 16, pp. 4–33.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0735-2751.00040

Byczkowska-Owczarek Dominika (2014), Kryzys ciała – spojrzenie socjologiczne na proces fizjoterapii, “Fizjoterapia”, vol. 3, pp. 49–66.
Google Scholar

Durkheim Emile (1997), The Division of Labour in Society, New York: Free Press.
Google Scholar

Estebanez-Pérez María-José, Pastora-Bernal José-Manuel, Vinolo-Gil María-Jesús, Pastora-Estebanez Pablo, Martín-Valero Rocío (2024), Digital physiotherapy is a satisfactory and effective method to improve the quality of life in Long COVID patients, “Digital Health”, vol. 10, pp. 1–13.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076241234432

Glaser Barney, Strauss Anselm (2017) The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research, New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203793206

Kozyr-Kowalski Stanisław (1979), Klasy i stany. Max Weber a współczesne teorie stratyfikacji społecznej, Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
Google Scholar

Krzesicka Julia (2019), Ciało i dotyk w nauce praktyk fizjoterapeutycznych z perspektywy socjologii ucieleśnienia, „AVANT Pismo Awangardy Filozoficzno-Naukowej”, vol. 3, pp. 1–20.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.26913/avant.2019.03.25

Marglin Stephen A. (1974), What Do Bosses Do? The Origins and Functions of Hierarchy in Capitalist Production, Part I, “Review of Radical Political Economics”, vol. 6(2), pp. 60–112.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/048661347400600206

Marglin Stephen A. (2008), The Dismal Science. How Thinking Like an Economist Undermines Community, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar

Marglin Stephen A. (2015), Losing Tough. The Cultural Conditions of Worker Accommodation and Resistance, [in:] Victior D. Lippit (ed.), Radical Political Economy: Explorations in Alternative Economic Analysis, London–New York: Rutledge, pp. 86–114.
Google Scholar

Modrzyk Ariel (2020), Wiedza w ręku. Wiedza niedyskursywna i czucie ciała pacjenta w zawodzie terapeuty manualnego, „Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej”, vol. XVI, no. 2, pp. 128–150.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8069.16.2.08

Saxena Akanksha, Mandeep K. Jangra (2023), The level of perceived stress, burnout, self-efficacy, and coping strategies among physiotherapy academicians during the COVID-19 lockdown, “Work”, vol. 75(1), pp. 11–17.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-211385

Statut Polskiego Towarzystwa Fizjoterapii (2023), http://fizjoterapia.org.pl/o-ptf/statut-ptf/ (accessed: 8.02.2025).
Google Scholar

Weber Max (1978), Economy and Society. An Outline of Interpretive Sociology, Berkeley–Los Angeles–London: University of California Press.
Google Scholar

Wright Erik O. (1980), Class and Occupation, “Theory and Society. An Interdisciplinary Social Science Journal”, vol. 9(1), Special Issue on Work and the Working Class, pp. 177–214.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00158896

Yin Robert K. (2013) Case study research: design and methods, Beverly Hills: Sage.
Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2025-11-30

How to Cite

Sokół, W., & Mika, B. (2025). The Creation of the Social Boundaries of Occupation Based on the Example of Physiotherapists in Poland. Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej, 21(4), 138–153. https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8069.21.4.08

Issue

Section

Numer tematyczny