Świat kryptosztuki w latach 2020–2021. Reprodukcja znanej rzeczywistości

Barbara Lewicka

doi:10.18778/1733-8069.21.1.04

Autor

Barbara Lewicka University of Silesia in Katowice https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7692-5008

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8069.21.1.04

Słowa kluczowe:

NFT, świat sztuki, świat kryptosztuki, socjologia sztuki, perspektywa produkcji kulturowej

Abstrakt

W latach 2020–2021 doszło do wzrostu zainteresowania sztuką NFT i jednocześnie do reprodukcji niektórych struktur klasycznego świata sztuki w przestrzeni wirtualnej. Tę nowo powstałą rzeczywistość można określić mianem świata kryptosztuki, który porównano w artykule z klasycznym światem sztuki. Celem opracowania była klasyfikacja podmiotów świata kryptosztuki, określenie ich ról, scharakteryzowanie relacji wewnętrznych i zewnętrznych, wreszcie wskazanie, że klasyczna perspektywa produkcji kulturowej jest adekwatna do analizy współczesnych zjawisk artystycznych, takich jak twórczość NFT. Badanie oparte było na analizie źródeł pierwotnych i wtórnych. Wyniki wskazują, że klasyczny świat sztuki został odtworzony w świecie kryptosztuki w pięciu obszarach: instytucjonalizacji, legitymizacji, hierarchizacji i polaryzacji, centralizacji, konfliktu ideologicznego. Wyniki wypełniają lukę w jakościowych analizach sztuki NFT i poszerzają wnioski z poprzednich prac na jej temat.

Pobrania

Brak dostępnych danych do wyświetlenia.

Biogram autora

Barbara Lewicka - University of Silesia in Katowice

PhD, Institute of Sociology, University of Silesia. Received a PhD in sociology. Completed postgraduate studies in Art History and Contemporary Visual Culture at the Institute of Art of the Polish Academy of Sciences (2023) and a long-term course on contemporary art at the Barnes Foundation, Philadelphia, USA (2023–2024). Her academic interests include the sociology of art, the sociology of culture, and the sociology of social change. She conducted research at the Terra Foundation for American Art in Paris (2021), at Columbia University in New York as a Fulbright Scholar (2019/2020), and as a Kosciuszko Foundation Fellow (2023).

Bibliografia

Alexander Victoria D., Bowler Anne E. (2021), Contestation in aesthetic fields: Legitimation and legitimacy struggles in outsider art, “Poetics”, vol. 84, 101485, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2020.101485
Google Scholar

Almeda Shm Garanganao, Hartmann Bjoern (2023), NFT Art World: The Influence of Decentralized Systems on the Development of Novel Online Creative Communities and Cooperative Practices, Conference materials: DIS ‘23, July 10–14, 2023, Pittsburgh, pp. 353–370, https://doi.org/10.1145/3563657.3596034
Google Scholar

ARTnews (2021), Top 200 Collectors, https://www.artnews.com/art-collectors/top-200-collectors/top-200-collectors/ [accessed: 2.04.2024].
Google Scholar

Art Rights (2021), 5 Great Crypto Art Collectors, https://www.artrights.me/en/5-great-collectors-of-crypto-art/ [accessed: 2.04.2024].
Google Scholar

Artsy (2022), The Artsy Gallery Insights: 2022 Report, https://partners.artsy.net/resource/2022-gallery-insights-report [accessed: 2.04.2024].
Google Scholar

Baumann Shayon (2007), A general theory of artistic legitimation: How art worlds are like social movements, “Poetics”, vol. 35(1), pp. 47–65, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2006.06.001
Google Scholar

Becker Howard S. (1976), Art Worlds and Social Types, “American Behavioral Scientist”, vol. 19(6), pp. 703–718, https://doi.org/10.1177/000276427601900603
Google Scholar

Becker Howard S. (2008), Art Worlds, Berkeley: University of California Press.
Google Scholar

Boido Claudio, Aliano Mauro (2023), Digital art and non-fungible-token: Bubble or revolution?, “Finance Research Letters”, vol. 52, 103380, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.103380
Google Scholar

Bourdieu Pierre (1996), The Rules of Art: Genesis and Structure of the Literary Field, Redwood City: Stanford University Press, https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503615861
Google Scholar

Bourdieu Pierre (2015), Manet: A Symbolic Revolution, Cambridge: Polity.
Google Scholar

Brenson Michael (1998), The Curator’s Moment, “Art Journal,” vol. 57(4), pp. 16–27, https://doi.org/10.1080/00043249.1998.10791901
Google Scholar

Brown Kate (2021), NFTs Make Their Debut at Art Basel, Where Collectors Are Curious – And a Bit Confused – About the New Art Medium, https://news.artnet.com/market/nfts-art-basel-2011438 [accessed: 2.04.2024].
Google Scholar

Cabin VC (2021), NFT Industrial Development Report Q1 2021, https://web.archive.org/web/20221130084105/https://www.cabin.vc/img/NFTIndustrialDevelopmentReportQ12021-EN.pdf [accessed: 2.04.2024].
Google Scholar

Cascone Sarah (2021), The 10 Most Expensive NFT Artworks of 2021, From Beeple’s $69 Million ‘Everydays’ to XCOPY’s $3.8 Million Portrait of ‘Some Asshole’, https://news.artnet.com/market/most-expensive-nft-art-yearend-2052822 [accessed: 2.04.2024].
Google Scholar

Castells Manuel (2012), Networks of Outrage and Hope. Social Movements in the Internet Age, Cambridge: Polity.
Google Scholar

Christie’s (2021), A record-breaking year at Christie’s: 2021 in numbers, https://www.christies.com/features/christies-auctionhighlights-2021-12019-1.aspx?sc_lang=en [accessed: 2.04.2024].
Google Scholar

Clark Mitchell (2021), NFTs, explained, https://www.theverge.com/22310188/nft-explainer-what-is-blockchain-crypto-art-faq [accessed: 2.04.2024].
Google Scholar

Colavizza Giovanni (2023), Seller-buyer networks in NFT art are driven by preferential ties, “Frontiers in Blockchain”, vol. 5, pp. 1–12, https://doi.org/10.3389/fbloc.2022.1073499
Google Scholar

Crane Diane (1992), The Production of Culture: Media and the Urban Arts, California: Sage Publications, https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483325699
Google Scholar

Cummings Neil (2014), Joy Forever, [in:] Michał Kozłowski, Agnieszka Kurant, Jan Sowa, Krystian Szadkowski, Kuba Szreder (eds.), Joy Forever: The Political Economy of Social Creativity, Warszawa: Fundacja Bęc Zmiana, pp. 31–47, https://mayflybooks.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/9781906948191-web.pdf [accessed: 14.10.2024].
Google Scholar

Dash Anil (2021), NFTs Weren’t Supposed to End Like This, https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2021/04/nfts-werentsupposed-end-like/618488/ [accessed: 2.04.2024].
Google Scholar

George (1974), Art and the Aesthetic: An Institutional Analysis, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Google Scholar

DiMaggio Paul (1986), Structural analysis of organizational fields: A blockmodel approach, [in:] Barry Stew, L.L. Cummings (eds.), Research on Organizational Behavior: An Annual Series of Analytical Essays and Critical Reviews, Greenwich: JAI Press, pp. 335–370.
Google Scholar

Eden Gallery (2021), Crypto Art: What is it & How Does it Work?, https://www.eden-gallery.com/news/what-is-crypto-art [accessed: 2.04.2024].
Google Scholar

Evans Toynia M. (2019), Cryptokitties, cryptography, and copyright 1 – BYU Copyright Symposium, “AIPLA QJ”, vol. 47, pp. 219–247, https://www.readkong.com/page/cryptokitties-cryptography-and-copyright-1257924 [accessed: 2.04.2024].
Google Scholar

Foster Hal, Krauss Rosalind, Bois Yve-Alain, Buchloh Benjamin H.D., Joselit David (2004), Art Since 1900, London: Thames & Hudson.
Google Scholar

Franceschet Massimo, Colavizza Giovanni, Smith T’ai, Finucane Blake, Ostachowski Martin Lukas, Scalet Sergio, Perkins Jonathan, Morgan James, Hernández Sebastián (2021), Crypto Art: A Decentralized View, “Leonardo”, vol. 54(4), pp. 402–405, https://doi.org/10.1162/leon_a_02003
Google Scholar

Fuente Eduardo de la (2007), The ‘New Sociology of Art’: Putting Art Back into Social Science Approaches to the Arts, “Cultural Sociology,” vol. 1(3), pp. 409–425, https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975507084601
Google Scholar

Google Trends (n.d), FAQ about Google Trends data, https://support.google.com/trends/answer/4365533?hl=en [accessed: 2.04.2024].
Google Scholar

Grba Dejan (2023), Faux Semblants: A Critical Outlook on the Commercialization of Digital Art, “Digital”, vol. 3(1), pp. 67–80, https://doi.org/10.3390/digital3010005
Google Scholar

Haaften-Schick Lauren van, Whitaker Amy (2021), From the Artist’s Contract to the Blockchain Ledger: New Forms of Artists’ Funding Using Equity and Resale Royalties, „SSRN Electronic Journal”, January, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3842210
Google Scholar

Hamacher Adriana, Hayward Andrew (2021), 15 Biggest NFT Influencers of 2021, https://decrypt.co/89158/15-biggest-nftinfluencers-of-2021 [accessed: 2.04.2024].
Google Scholar

Heinich Nathalie (2004), The Sociology of Art, London: Routledge.
Google Scholar

Hirsch Paul M. (1972), Processing Fads and Fashions: An Organization-Set Analysis of Cultural Industry Systems, “American Journal of Sociology”, vol. 77, pp. 639–659, https://doi.org/10.1086/225192
Google Scholar

Kinsella Eileen (2021), Think Everyone Is Getting Rich Off NFTs? Most Sales Are Actually $200 or Less, According to One Report, https://news.artnet.com/market/think-artists-are-getting-rich-off-nfts-think-again-1962752 [accessed: 2.04.2024].
Google Scholar

McAndrew Clare (2023), Art Basel & UBS Report ‘The Art Market 2022’, https://web.archive.org/web/20230326102749/https://d2u3kfwd92fzu7.cloudfront.net/Art%20Market%202022.pdf [accessed: 2.04.2024].
Google Scholar

Mitu Florina-Gabriela, Bota Marius (2023), Exploratory Research on Using NFT for Selling Digital Art, [in:] Adina Letiția Negrușa, Monica Maria Coroş (eds.), Remodelling Businesses for Sustainable Development. 2nd International Conference on Modern Trends in Business, Hospitality, and Tourism, Cluj-Napoca, Romania, 2022, Cham: Springer, pp. 39–50, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19656-0_4
Google Scholar

Mulkay Michael, Chaplin Elizabeth (1982), Aesthetics and the Artistic Career: A Study of Anomie in Fine Art Painting, “Sociological Quarterly”, vol. 23, pp. 117–138, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.1982.tb02224.x
Google Scholar

Nadini Matthieu, Alessandretti Laura, Di Giacinto Flavio, Martino Mauro, Aiello Luca Maria, Baronchelli Andrea (2021), Mapping the NFT revolution: Market trends, trade networks, and visual features, “Scientific Reports”, vol. 11, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-00053-8
Google Scholar

NFTPlazas (2021), Curators in the CryptoArt Scene – A Necessary Controversy, https://nftplazas.com/cryptoart-curation/ [accessed: 2.04.2024].
Google Scholar

Non-Fungible (2021), Non-Fungible Tokens Yearly Report 2020, https://nonfungible.com/reports/2020/en/yearly-nft-market-report-free [accessed: 2.04.2024].
Google Scholar

Non-Fungible (2022), Yearly NFT Market Report 2021, https://nonfungible.com/reports/2021/en/yearly-nft-market-report-free [accessed: 2.04.2024].
Google Scholar

Pawelzik Leon, Thies Ferdinand (2022), Selling Digital Art for Millions – A Qualitative Analysis of NFT Art Marketplaces, “ECIS 2022 Research Papers”, vol. 53, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/361461561_SELLING_DIGITAL_ART_FOR_MILLIONS_-A_QUALITATIVE_ANALYSIS_OF_NFT_ART_MARKETPLACES [accessed: 2.04.2024].
Google Scholar

Peterson Richard A. (1994), Culture studies Though Production Perspective: Progress and Prospects, [in:] Diana Crane (ed.), The Sociology of Culture, Hoboken: Blackwell, pp. 163–190.
Google Scholar

Santillana (2021), The 20 Top-Selling NFT Artists to Collect Right Now, https://web.archive.org/web/20241112011917/https://gothammag.com/top-selling-nft-artists [accessed: 2.04.2024].
Google Scholar

Shaurya Thapa (2022), 20 Most Expensive NFTs Sold (So Far), https://screenrant.com/expensive-nfts-sold-so-far [accessed: 2.04.2024].
Google Scholar

Statista (2021), Value of sales involving a non-fungible token (NFT) in gaming, art, sports and other segments from 2018 to 2021 (in million U.S. dollars), https://www.statista.com/statistics/1221400/nft-sales-revenue-by-segment/ [accessed: 2.04.2024].
Google Scholar

Statista (2023), NFT art market, https://www.statista.com/study/112518/nft-art-market/ [accessed: 2.04.2024].
Google Scholar

SuperRare (2020), Governance 101: How does the SuperRare DAO work?, https://help.superrare.com/en/articles/5429518-governance-101-how-does-the-superrare-dao-work [accessed: 2.04.2024].
Google Scholar

SuperRare (2021), From Michelangelo to the metaverse: the past, present and future of art markets, https://medium.com/superrare/from-michelangelo-to-the-metaverse-the-past-present-and-future-of-art-markets-89d846fdd44b [accessed: 2.04.2024].
Google Scholar

Taddei Mario (2021), My last NFT. Milão, https://twitter.com/MarioTaddei72/status/1393289985403637764/photo/ [accessed: 2.04.2024].
Google Scholar

Thorton Sarah (2008), Seven Days in Art World, New York: Norton & Co.
Google Scholar

Valeonti Foteini, Bikakis Antonis, Terras Melissa, Speed Chris, Hudson-Smith Andrew, Chalkias Konstantinos (2021), Crypto Collectibles, Museum Funding and OpenGLAM: Challenges, Opportunities and the Potential of Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs), “Applied Sciences”, vol. 11(21), 9931, https://doi.org/10.3390/app11219931
Google Scholar

Vasan Kishore, Janosov Milan, Barbasi Albert Laslo (2022), Quantifying NFT‐driven networks in crypto art, “Scientific Reports”, vol. 12, 2769, http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-05146-6
Google Scholar

White Harrison, White Cynthia (1965), Canvases and Careers: Institutional Change in the French Painting World, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar

Yilmaz Tuba, Sagfossen Sofie, Velasco Carlos (2023), What makes NFTs valuable to consumers? Perceived value drivers associated with NFTs liking, purchasing, and holding, “Journal of Business Research”, vol. 165, 114056, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114056
Google Scholar

Zhong Howard, Hamilton Mark (2023), Exploring gender and race biases in the NFT market, “Finance Research Letters”, vol. 53, 103651, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.103651
Google Scholar