Towards the EU Capital Market: The Impact of the ‘FASTER’ Directive
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/2391-6478.3.47.04Keywords:
free movement of capital, withholding taxes, Capital Markets Union, DirectiveAbstract
The purpose of the article. This article aims to analyse the ‘FASTER’ Directive and to examine the relevance of its measures, as well as the possible consequences of their implementation.
Methodology. Reports from the European institutions, specifically from the European Parliament, the proposal for a Council Directive and the Directive 2025/50 were consulted. National and international literature on the subject was also analysed in order to better understand the doctrine’s perspectives on the subject.
Results of the research. This study revealed that the adoption of a Directive is the best solution for resolving the issues of double taxation and complicated and costly procedures for refunding of withholding tax. This will enable a joint response to the phenomena of tax fraud and abuse, which have caused Member States to lose huge amounts of revenue. The introduction of the new measures will enable an increase in cross-border investment, benefiting the single market and preventing the cases of cum-cum and cum-ex.
Downloads
References
Banham, M., & Hodge, R. (2020). Dividend Arbitrage. Mitigating exposure to Europe’s largest tax scandal. The Hedge Fund Journal, 150.
Google Scholar
Case C-374/04, Test Claimants in Class IV of the ACT Group Litigation contra Commissioners of Inland Revenue (2006) ECR I-11673.
Google Scholar
Case C-379/05, Amurta SGPS v Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst/Amsterdam (2007) ECR I-09569.
Google Scholar
Case C 540/07, Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic (2009) ECR I-10983.
Google Scholar
Case C 487/08, European Commission v Kingdom of Spain (2010) ECR I-04843.
Google Scholar
Case C 284/09, European Commission v Federal Republic of Germany (2011) ECR I-09879.
Google Scholar
Case C-387/11, European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium (2012).
Google Scholar
Case C-312/22, FL v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira (2023).
Google Scholar
Casi, E., Gavrilova, E., Murphy, D., & Zoutman, F. (2021). Dividend Withholding Tax Arbitrage Across Europe: Revenue and Welfare Effects of Vulnerabilities in the Tax Code. University of Oxford.
Google Scholar
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1675 of 14 July 2016 supplementing Directive (EU) 2015/849 of the European Parliament and of the Council by identifying high-risk third countries with strategic deficiencies (2016). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2016/1675/oj/eng
Google Scholar
Council Conclusions (C/2024/6322) on the Revised EU List of Non-Cooperative Jurisdictions for Tax Purposes (2024). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6322/oj/eng
Google Scholar
Council Directive 2003/48/EC of 3 June 2003 on taxation of savings income in the form of interest payments (2003). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2003/48/oj/eng
Google Scholar
Council Directive 2011/16/EU of 15 February 2011 on admnistrative cooperation in the field of taxation and repealing Directive 77/799/EEC (2011). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2011/16/oj/eng
Google Scholar
Council Directive (EU) 2025/50 of 10 December 2024 on faster and safer relief of excess withholding taxes (2024). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=OJ:L_202500050
Google Scholar
Dibout, P., & Offermanns, R. (1998). France. In P. Essers, G. De Bont and E. Kemmeren (Eds.), The Compatibility of Anti-Abuse Provisions in Tax Treaties with EC Law (p. 93). Kluwer Law International.
Google Scholar
Directive (EU) 2015/849 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2015 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering on terrorist financing, amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and repealing Directive 2005/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Comission Directive 2006/70/EC (2015). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2015/849/oj/eng
Google Scholar
Doerfer, A. (2022). Olaf Scholz and the Cum-Ex Scandal. American German Institute. https://americangerman.institute/2022/10/olaf-scholz-and-the-cum-ex-scandal/
Google Scholar
Doobay, S., & Ruchelman, S. C. (2022). Adventures in Cross-Border Tax Collection: Revenue Rule vs. Cum-Ex Litigation. Tax Notes International. https://www.taxnotes.com/special-reports/information-exchange/adventures-cross-border-tax-collection-revenue-rule-vs-cum-ex-litigation/2022/04/15/7db9g?highlight=cum-ex&fbclid=IwY2xjawJjQPhleHRuA2FlbQIxMAABHqOtJAWabRHaTguJ75tdUyDh54X40BRG9jswyDm1Jzplr6M1e6zQi0BZN6bA_aem_CznqxWWmDdgvwAyVE1Tqbw
Google Scholar
Dourado, A., & Reigada Pereira, R. (2006). Portugal. In F. Vanistendael (Ed.), The EC Draft Directive on Interest from savings. IBFD.
Google Scholar
Dourado, A. (2018). Governação Fiscal Global. Almedina.
Google Scholar
Resolution C/2024/492 of the European Parliament of 15 June 2023 on lessons learnt from the Pandora Papers and other revelations (2023). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52023IP0249
Google Scholar
European Parliament. (2024). FASTER – Faster and safer tax excess relief. EU Legislation in Progress. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2023/751436/EPRS_BRI(2023)751436_EN.pdf
Google Scholar
Easson, A. J. (1993). Taxation in the European Community. European Community law series.
Google Scholar
Feria, R. De La. (2008). Evolução do conceito de abuso do direito no âmbito do direito fiscal comunitário. Revista de Finanças Públicas e Direito Fiscal, 1 (2), p. 214.
Google Scholar
Frescurato, D., & Bortolameazzi, F. (2023). FASTER: The Proposal to Streamline Withholding Tax Procedures. Tax Notes International. https://www.taxnotes.com/special-reports/international-taxation/faster-proposal-streamline-withholding-tax-procedures/2023/08/11/7h238
Google Scholar
Hoke, W. (2023). Dubai Court Rules Shah Owes Denmark $1.25 Billion in Cum-Ex Case. Tax Notes International. https://www.taxnotes.com/featured-news/dubai-court-rules-shah-owes-denmark-125-billion-cum-ex-case/2023/05/17/7gphw?highlight=cum-ex&fbclid=IwY2xjawJjQSJleHRuA2FlbQIxMAABHueqyUooG8L20gzbo0fydjBvKqXY6d-NlhPNIxwH8kzr7eJldyyfHvKdsOaX_aem_g9FAEM67sAejwVrG-E4v5A
Google Scholar
Nicoleta Ionescu, R. (2012). L’abus de droit en droit de l’Union européenne. Bruylant.
Google Scholar
Pistone, P. (2017). The Meaning of Tax Avoidance and Agressive Tax Planning in European Union Tax Law: Some Thoughts in Connection with the Reaction to Such Practices by the European Union. In A. Dourado (Ed.), Tax Avoidance Revisited in the EU BEPS Context, p. 73–74, IBFD.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59403/1nd27ph004
Proposal for a Council Directive on Faster and Safer Relief of Excess Withholding Taxes (COM/2023/324). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:37521110-0e7d-11ee-b12e-01aa75ed71a1.0001.02/DOC_1&format=PDF
Google Scholar
Radcliffe, P., & Devisscher, R. (2023). FASTER: The European Comission Publishes a Proposed Council Directive Aimed at Improving the Withholding Tax Process within the European Union. European Taxation, p. 321–327.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59403/2r4xv13
Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms and amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 Text with EEA relevance (2013). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2013/575/oj/eng
Google Scholar
Regulation (EU) No 909/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 2014 on improving securities settlement in the European Union and on central securities depositories and amending Directives 98/26/EC and 2014/65/EU and Regulation (EU) No 236/2012 Text with EEA relevance (2014). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2014/909/oj/eng
Google Scholar
Saldanha Sanches, J. L. (2006). Os Limites do Planeamento Fiscal. Substância e forma no Direito Fiscal português comunitário e internacional. Coimbra Editora.
Google Scholar
Sérgio Ribeiro, J. (2021). Direito Fiscal da União Europeia, Almedina.
Google Scholar
Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (OJ C 326/49, 26.10.2012).
Google Scholar
Vanistendael, F. (2006). Halifax and Cadbury Scheweppes: one single European theory of abuse in tax law?. EC Tax Review, (4).
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54648/ECTA2006036
Vogel, K., Gutmann, D., & Dourado, A. (2006). Tax treaties between Member States and Third States: ‘reciprocity in bilateral tax treaties and non-discrimination. EC Tax Review, (2).
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54648/ECTA2006017
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.




