Access to Financial Information for Tax Purposes and Proportionality – Balancing Public Interest with the Protection of Privacy

Autor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/2391-6478.3.39.01

Słowa kluczowe:

financial information, tax, privacy, public interest

Abstrakt

The purpose of the article is to analyse how to balance public interests with the protection of privacy in the tax field. It has not been an easy task especially in the context of access to financial information.

In this area, the compromise to achieve transparency needs to pay regard to the principle of proportionality, as reinforced by recent case law of the ECJ, and align with specific legislation such as the EU General Data Protection Regulation and recently enacted EU Digital Services Act.

It is extremely important to investigate the possible consequences of acting against fundamental rights that are attributed to European citizens (and not only), such as the right to privacy and the protection of personal data. The paper aims to provide relevant and further insight to paths that lead to a fair way to handle such relevant information.

Every citizen, every academically inclined and dedicated individual, every public official, every judicial agent, must question whether the public interest can ever, or at least, recurrently, surpass a fundamental right to privacy, specially, in a sensible area as the financial information of an individual. Such actions can often lead, if mistakes are made along the way, to dangerous outcomes, such as public humiliation, and can even harm the person’s professional and personal life.

Methodology. In the course of the paper, an analysis is made of public decisions taken in cases across the European continent. Additionally, some considerations are made about the recent legislation that is produced by competent authorities, particularly the European Institutions.

Results of the research. The authors offer a personal insight regarding the information that has been gathered, confirming some significant concerns. What is of crucial importance, as stated in the title of this article, is a well established balance between the public interest and the protection of privacy, with explained and defined possible paths to follow.

Pobrania

Brak dostępnych danych do wyświetlenia.

Bibliografia

Portuguese Law 87/2017, of the 18th of August, which establishes measures to combat money laundering and terrorist financing, partially transposes Directives 2015/849/EU, of the European Parliament and of the Council, of 20 May 2015, and 2016/2258/EU, of the Council, of 6 of December 2016, amends the Penal Code and the Industrial Property Code and revokes Law n.º 25/2008, of June 5, and Decree-Law n.º 125/2008, of July 21.
Google Scholar

Beneficial Ownership Registration, of the Portuguese Government. https://justica.gov.pt/servicos/Registo-de-Beneficiario-Efetivo [Accessed 12.03.2023].
Google Scholar

Directive (EU) 2015/849 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2015 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing, amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and repealing Directive 2005/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Commission Directive 2006/70/EC.
Google Scholar

Directive 2005/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2005 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purpose of money laundering and terrorist financing.
Google Scholar

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 November 2022. WM and Sovim SA v Luxembourg Business Registers. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62020CJ0037 [Accessed 12.03.2023].
Google Scholar

Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation).
Google Scholar

Decision of the Data Protection Commissioner Case Dnro 3681/186/21 on the delimitation of personal data processed in connection with the implementation of comparative data checks.
Google Scholar

Szymacha, A. (2021). Fundamental Rights and the Obligation to Publicly Disclose Information on Tax Strategy. Journal of Finance and Financial Law, 4(32), 7–20.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/2391-6478.4.32.01

Opublikowane

2023-09-28

Jak cytować

Teixeira, G., Pinho, M. F., & Teixeira, H. (2023). Access to Financial Information for Tax Purposes and Proportionality – Balancing Public Interest with the Protection of Privacy. Finanse I Prawo Finansowe, 3(39), 7–14. https://doi.org/10.18778/2391-6478.3.39.01

Numer

Dział

Artykuł