Public Aid and Entrepreneurship During the Covid-19 Pandemic in the European Union Countries

Małgorzata Jabłońska; Joanna Stawska; Radosław Dziuba; Mahmut Tekce; Marta Krasoń

doi:10.18778/2391-6478.3.31.04

Authors

Małgorzata Jabłońska University of Lodz, Faculty of Economics and Sociology https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1465-8818
Joanna Stawska University of Lodz, Faculty of Economics and Sociology https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6863-1210
Radosław Dziuba University of Lodz, Faculty of Economics and Sociology https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7161-8022
Mahmut Tekce University of Marmara, Istanbul, Turkey https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6910-747X
Marta Krasoń University of Lodz, Faculty of Law

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/2391-6478.3.31.04

Keywords:

Covid-19, pandemic, public aid, SME, entrepreneurship, economy

Abstract

The aim of the article: The outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic made it necessary to involve the state in the process of rescuing numerous business entities from bankruptcy. In the European Union, the aid measure for entrepreneurs takes a form of public aid, which, as it turns out, is the necessary and the only tool to protect SME sector enterprises against bankruptcy. Social isolation caused by the virus that spread on a large scale effectively inhibited the development of entrepreneurship, which is inherently related to the economic development of countries. The aim of the article is therefore to indicate that supporting entrepreneurs within the framework of public aid may help to reverse the unfavorable economic trends related to the disturbed development of entrepreneurship.

Methodology: The article analyzes and assesses the government solutions introduced to the Polish economic reality, the purpose of which is to counteract the effects of Covid-19. The paper presents the current public aid tools available to entrepreneurs along with their financial dimension.

Results of the research: State aid granted by the state to entrepreneurs during the crisis caused by Covid-19 is indispensable for their further functioning. The paper presents aid instruments related to COVID-19 that are available to entrepreneurs. The analysis shows that public aid addressed to entrepreneurs injured as a result of the lockdown comes from many sources and is almost tailored to the individual entrepreneur. The entities providing aid on the basis of state aid include: banks, local government units, executive bodies of local government units, Social Insurance Fund, State Fund for Rehabilitation of Disabled People, financial intermediaries, bodies constituting local government units, the European Investment Bank, Polish Development Fund, district and voivodeship labor offices and BGK (Bank Gospodarstwa Krajowego). Having prepared a package of systemic solutions, the government introduced them systematically, depending on the situation of individual sectors of the economy. Special solutions in the form of financial shields were addressed directly to the tourism sector (e.g. loans for tour operators) or the catering sector, which in the face of the pandemic were most exposed to a decrease in revenues. The impact of introduced solutions on the country’s economy can be assessed only in the next few years, but the multitude and diversified nature of the anti-crisis solutions introduced in Poland will certainly contribute to slowing down the negative consequences of Covid-19 in the economy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adam, N.A. and Alarifi, G. (2021). Innovation practices for survival of small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in the COVID-19 times: the role of external support. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 10(1), 15 doi: 10.1186/s13731-021-00156-6
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-021-00156-6

Bartniczak, B. (2017). Market Failures as Premises of Granting State Aid. Economic and Environmental Studies, 17(3).
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.25167/ees.2017.43.2

Bondarenko, K. (2020). The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Case of Remittance Recipient Countries12. International Organisations Research Journal, 15(3).
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/1996-7845-2020-03-04

Chen, J., Huang, J., Su, W., Štreimikienė, D. and Baležentis, T. (2021). The challenges of COVID-19 control policies for sustainable development of business: Evidence from service industries. Technology in Society, 66,101643 doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101643
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101643

Czechowska, I.D., Stawska J. i Witczak R., ed. (2020). Bezpieczeństwo i stabilność systemu finansowego. Perspektywa makro- i mikroekonomiczna, [Security and stability of the financial system. Macro- and microeconomic perspective]. Lodz: Publishing House of the University of Lodz, p. 47.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/8220-383-7

Dhewanto, W., Nazmuzzaman, E. and Fauzan, T.R. (2020). Cross-countries’ policies comparison of supporting small and medium-sized enterprises during covid-19 pandemic, Proceedings of the European Conference on Innovation and Entrepreneurship, ECIE 2020 – September, pp. 218–225 doi: 10.34190/EIE.20.236
Google Scholar

ECB, Monetary policy decision https://www.ecb.europa.eu/mopo/decisions/html/index.en.html [Accessed 26.06.2021].
Google Scholar

Europejski Fundusz Gwarancyjny czeka na polskie instytucje finansowe [The European Guarantee Fund is waiting for Polish financial institutions] https://www.parkiet.com/Firmy/312289861-Europejski-Fundusz-Gwarancyjny-czeka-na-polskie-instytucje-finansowe.html [Accessed 27.07.2021].
Google Scholar

Grondys, K., Ślusarczyk, O., Hussain, H.I. and Androniceanu, A. (2021). Risk assessment of the SME sector operations during the covid-19 pandemic. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(8), 4183 doi: 10.3390/ijerph18084183
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18084183

https://ec.europa.eu/growth/smes_en [Accessed 19.05.2021].
Google Scholar

https://www.gov.pl/web/tarczaantykryzysowa [Accessed 26.06.2021].
Google Scholar

Hu, H., Yang, Y., Zhang, J. (2021). Avoiding panic during pandemics: COVID-19 and tourism-related businesses. Tourism Management, 86, 104316 doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2021.104316
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2021.104316

Kobayashi, Y., Heinrich, T., Bryant, K.A. (2021). Public support for development aid during the COVID-19 pandemic. World Development, 138.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105248

Lista instrumentów pomocowych związanych z Covid-19, Lista_instrumentow_pomocowych_zwiazanych_z_COVID-19_stan_na_20210714.pdf [dostęp 15.08.2021].
Google Scholar

Markovic, S., Koporcic, N., Arslanagic-Kalajdzic, M., Kadic-Maglajlic, S., Bagherzadeh, M., Islam, N. (2021). Business-to-business open innovation: COVID-19 lessons for small and medium-sized enterprises from emerging markets. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 170 , art. no. 120883 doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120883
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120883

McDonald, I.M. (2020). Macroeconomic Policy to Aid Recovery after Social Distancing for COVID-19. Australian Economic Review, 53(3).
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8462.12387

Meahjohn Inshan and Persad Prakash. (2020). The Impact of COVID-19 on Entrepreneurship Globally. Journal of Economics and Business, 3(3).
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1992.03.03.272

Omrani, H., Modroiu, M., Lenzi, J., Omrani, B., Said, Z., Suhrcke, M., Tchicaya, A., Nguyen, N. and Parmentier, B. (2021). COVID-19 in Europe: Dataset at a sub-national level. Data In Brief, 35(106939) doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2021.106939
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2021.106939

PWC https://www.pwc.pl/pl/pdf-nf/2020/formy-dofinansowania-dla-firm.pdf [dostęp 21.12.2020] oraz Tarcza 4.0 z podpisem prezydenta RP, z dnia 23.06.2020 r. [za:] https://www.gov.pl/web/rozwoj-praca-technologia/tarcza-40-z-podpisem-prezydenta-rp2 [dostęp 21.12.2020].
Google Scholar

Raport o stanie sektora małych i średnich przedsiębiorstw w Polsce [Report on the condition of the sector of small and medium-sized enterprises in Poland] (2020). Warsaw: Polish Agency for Enterprise Development.
Google Scholar

Rozporządzenie Rady Ministrów z dnia 26 lutego 2021 r. w sprawie wsparcia uczestników obrotu gospodarczego poszkodowanych wskutek pandemii COVID-19, Dz.U. 2021, poz. 371.
Google Scholar

Rozporządzenie Rady Ministrów z dnia 19 stycznia 2021 r. w sprawie wsparcia uczestników obrotu gospodarczego poszkodowanych wskutek pandemii COVID-19, Dz.U. 2021, poz. 152.
Google Scholar

Sektor MSP w Polsce i UE (2017). Warszawa: Polska Agencja Rozwoju Przedsiębiorczości.
Google Scholar

Solarz, J.K i Waliszewski, K. (2021). Holistic management of the COVID-19 pandemic, edu-Libri.
Google Scholar

Stephan, U., Zbierowski, P., Pérez-Luño, A. and Klausen A. (2021). Entrepreneurship during the Covid-19 Pandemic: A global study of entrepreneurs’ challenges,resilience, and well-being, KBS Covid-19 Research Impact Papers, 4.
Google Scholar

SURE instrument, European Commission https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/economic-and-fiscal-policy-coordination/financial-assistance-eu/funding-mechanisms-and-facilities/sure_pl [Accessed 27.07.2021].
Google Scholar

UOKiK, EU legal acts in the field of state aid https://www.uokik.gov.pl/unijne_akty_prawne_w_zakresie_pomocy_publicznej.php [Accessed 19.05.2021].
Google Scholar

Ustawa z dnia 17 września 2020 r. o zmianie ustawy o szczególnych rozwiązaniach związanych z zapobieganiem, przeciwdziałaniem i zwalczaniem COVID-19, innych chorób zakaźnych oraz wywołanych nimi sytuacji kryzysowych oraz niektórych innych ustaw, Dz.U. 2020, poz. 1639.
Google Scholar

Ustawa z dnia 9 grudnia 2020 r. o zmianie ustawy o szczególnych rozwiązaniach związanych z zapobieganiem, przeciwdziałaniem i zwalczaniem COVID-19, innych chorób zakaźnych oraz wywołanych nimi sytuacji kryzysowych oraz niektórych innych ustaw, Dz.U. 2020, poz. 2255.
Google Scholar

Wyrok Sądu z dnia 5 kwietnia 2006 r. w sprawie T-351/02 Deutsche Bahn AG przeciwko Komisji, ECLI:EU:T:2006:104, dotyczącej zwolnień z podatków wymaganych przez prawo unijne.
Google Scholar

Wyrok Trybunału Sprawiedliwości z dnia 10 stycznia 2006 r. w sprawie C-222/04 Cassa di Risparmio di Firenze SpA i in., ECLI:EU:C:2006:8.
Google Scholar

Wyrok Trybunału Sprawiedliwości z dnia 12 września 2000 r. w sprawach połączonych od C-180/98 do C-184/98 Pavlov i in., ECLI:EU:C:2000:428.
Google Scholar

Wyrok Trybunału Sprawiedliwości z dnia 16 czerwca 1987 r. w sprawie 118/85 Komisja przeciwko Włochom, ECLI:EU: C:1987:283.
Google Scholar

Wyrok Trybunału Sprawiedliwości z dnia 18 czerwca 1998 r. w sprawie C-35/96 Komisja przeciwko Włochom, ECLI:EU:C:1998:303.
Google Scholar

Wyrok Trybunału Sprawiedliwości z dnia 23 kwietnia 2009 r. w sprawie C-460/07 Puffer ECLI:EU:C:2009:254, dotyczącej prawa do ulg podatkowych w ramach systemu VAT ustanowionego przez Unię Europejską.
Google Scholar

Zawiadomienie Komisji w sprawie pojęcia pomocy państwa w rozumieniu art. 107 ust. 1 Traktatu o funkcjonowaniu Unii Europejskiej (2016/C 262/01), Dz.Urz. UE z dnia 19.07.2016 r. na podstawie wyroku Trybunału Sprawiedliwości z dnia 22 grudnia 2008 r. w sprawie C-487/06P British Aggregates przeciwko Komisji, ECLI:EU: C:2008:757, pkt 111.
Google Scholar