Internal and External Sources of Knowledge in Manufacturing and Service Enterprises. A Comparative Analysis of European Union Countries
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/1508-2008.23.18Keywords:
knowledge, R&D, services, manufacturing, EUAbstract
Along with the development of economies based on knowledge, the importance of knowledge input in production processes has been increasing. Enterprises may acquire knowledge input by developing their internal knowledge base and/or purchasing knowledge from external entities. Their internal knowledge base may be developed mainly by employing highly qualified specialists and their own research. The aim of the paper is to examine the importance of all these knowledge sources in manufacturing and services enterprises, as well as to compare their changing role with productivity performance in EU countries. It is based on data from the World Input-Output Database, Eurostat, OECD and EU KLEMS. Thanks to the availability of relevant data, the analysed period covers the years 1995–2018. The study demonstrates that knowledge base, developed through both internal and external sources, played a significantly more important role in the EU-15 than in the EU-12, with a tendency to decrease these disparities (most visible with respect to KIBS input). The growing importance of an external knowledge base was more visible and stable in the EU-12 countries. R&D expenditures were an exception. The recent financial crisis heavily affected only external R&D expenditures.
Downloads
References
Abramovsky, L., Griffith, R., Sako, M. (2004), Offshoring of business services and its impact on the UK economy, IFS Briefing Note BN51, AIM Briefing Note. https://doi.org/10.1920/bn.ifs.2004.0051
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1920/bn.ifs.2004.0051
Baker, D. (2007), The impact of business-services use on client industries: evidence from input output data, [in:] L. Rubalcaba, H. Kox (eds), Business Services in European Economic Growth, Palgrave MacMillan, New York, pp. 97–115. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230228795_6
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230228795_6
Baldwin, R.E. (2014), Trade and Industrialisation after Globalisation’s Second Unbundling: How Building and Joining a Supply Chain are Different and Why it Matters, [in:] R.C. Feenstra, A.M. Taylor (eds), Globalisation in an Age of Crisis: Multilateral Economic Cooperation in the Twenty First Century, University of Chicago Press/NBER, Chicago, IL, pp. 165–212. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226030890.003.0006
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226030890.003.0006
Basit, S.A., Medase, K. (2019), The diversity of knowledge sources and its impact on firm-level innovation. Evidence from Germany, “European Journal of Innovation Management”, 22 (4), pp. 681–714. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-10-2018-0232
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-10-2018-0232
Berchicci, L. (2013), Towards an open R&D system: internal R&D investment, external knowledge acquisition and innovative performance, “Research Policy”, 42 (1), pp. 117–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.04.017
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.04.017
Bostani, M., Daraio, C., Grosskopf, S., Roucco, G., Weber, W.L. (2020), Sources and uses of knowledge in a dynamic network technology, “International Transactions in Operational Research”, 27, pp. 1821–1844. https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.12741
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.12741
Cotic Svetina, A., Prodan, I. (2008), How Internal and External Sources of Knowledge Contribute to Firms’ Innovation Performance, “Managing Global Transitions”, 6 (3), pp. 277–299.
Google Scholar
Dean, A., Kretschmer, M. (2007), Can ideas be capital? Factors of production in the post-industrial economy: a review and critique, “Academy of Management Review”, 32 (2), pp. 573–594. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.24351866
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.24351866
Di Cagno, D., Meliciani, V. (2005), Do inter-sectoral flows of services matter for productivity growth? An input/output analysis of OECD countries, “Economics of Innovation and New Technology”, 14 (3), pp. 149–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/1043859042000226239
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1043859042000226239
Divanna, J.A., Rogers, J. (2005), People – the new asset on the balance sheet, Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230509573
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230509573
EU-KLEMS (2017), Growth and Productivity Accounts: Statistical Module, ESA 2010 and ISIC Rev 4 Industry Classification, European Commission, Luxembourg.
Google Scholar
European System of Accounts – ESA 2010 (2013), European Commission, Luxembourg.
Google Scholar
Eurostat (2020a), Labour market: Employment by occupation and economic activity, European Commission, Luxembourg.
Google Scholar
Eurostat (2020b), Business expenditures on R&D (BERD) by NACE Rev. 2, European Commission, Luxembourg (5th March 2020).
Google Scholar
Eurostat (2020c), Eurostat indicators of High-tech industry and Knowledge-intensive services, Annex 3 – High-tech aggregation by NACE Rev. 2, European Commission, Luxembourg.
Google Scholar
Gabcanova, I. (2011), The Employees – The Most Important Asset in the Organisations, “Human Resources Management & Ergonomics”, V(1).
Google Scholar
Garavelli, A.C., Petruzzelli, A.M., Natalicchio, A., Vanhaverbeke, W. (2013), Benefiting from Markets for Ideas – An Investigation Across Different Typologies, “International Journal of Innovation Management”, 17 (6), 1340017. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919613400173
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919613400173
Gassmann, O. (2006), Opening Up the Innovation Process: Towards an Agenda, “R&D Management”, 36 (3), pp. 223–228. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00437.x
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00437.x
Howells, J. (1999), Research and Technology Outsourcing and Innovation Systems: An Exploratory Analysis, “Industry and Innovation”, 6 (1), pp. 111–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662719900000007
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13662719900000007
Jones, R.W., Kierzkowski, H. (1990), The role of services in production and international trade: a theoretical framework [in:] R.W. Jones, A. Krueger (eds), The Political Economy of International Trade, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 31–48.
Google Scholar
Kamuriwo, D.S., Baden-Fuller, C. (2016), Knowledge Integration Using Product R&D Outsourcing in Biotechnology, “Research Policy”, 45 (5),pp. 1031–1045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.02.009
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.02.009
Keeble, D., Wilkinson, F. (eds) (2000), High-technology clusters, networking and collective learning in Europe, Ashgate, Aldershot.
Google Scholar
Li, X., Gagliardi, D., Miles, I. (2019), Innovation in R&D service firms: evidence from the UK, “Technology Analysis & Strategic Management”, 31 (6), pp. 732–748. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2018.1549729
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2018.1549729
Martinez-Noya, A., Garcia-Canal, E., Guillen, M.F. (2012), International R&D Service Outsourcing by Technology-Intensive Firms: Whether and Where?, “Journal of International Management”, 18 (1), pp. 18–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2011.06.004
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2011.06.004
Massini, S., Miozzo, M. (2010), Outsourcing and Offshoring of Business Services: Challenges to Theory, Management and Geography of Innovation, “Manchester Business School Research Paper”, 604. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1683467
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1683467
Mu, J., Peng, G., Love, E. (2008), Interfirm networks, social capital, and knowledge flow, “Journal of Knowledge Management”, 12 (4), pp. 86–100. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270810884273
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270810884273
Nonaka, I. (1991), The knowledge-creating company, “Harvard Business Review”, 69 (6), pp. 96–104.
Google Scholar
Nonaka, I. (1994), A dynamic theory of organisational knowledge creation, “Organization Science”, 5 (1): pp. 14–37. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.1.14
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.1.14
O’Mahony, M., Timmer, M.P. (2009), Output, Input and Productivity Measures at the Industry Level: the EU KLEMS Database, “Economic Journal”, 119 (538), F374–F403. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2009.02280.x
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2009.02280.x
Santamaria, L., Nieto, M.J., Barge-Gil, A. (2009), Beyond formal R&D: Taking advantage of other sources of innovation in low- and medium-technology industries, “Research Policy”, 38 (3), pp. 507–517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.10.004
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.10.004
Schnabl, E., Zenker, A. (2013), Statistical Classification of Knowledge-Intensive Business Services (KIBS) with NACE Rev.2, evoREG Research Note #25.
Google Scholar
Schricke, E., Zenker, A., Stahlecker, T. (2012), Knowledge-Intensive (Business) Services in Europe, No EUR 25189: 52, European Commission, Luxembourg.
Google Scholar
STAN Database (2020), STAN R&D Expenditures in Industry (ISIC Rev. 3, ISIC Rev. 4), OECD, Paris (24th February 2020).
Google Scholar
Tomlinson, M. (2000), The contribution of knowledge-intensive services to the manufacturing industry [in:] B. Andersen, J. Howells, R. Hull, I. Miles, J. Roberts (eds), Knowledge and Innovation in the New Service Economy, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, pp. 36–48.
Google Scholar
World Input-Output Database (2013), Socio Economic Accounts, European Commission, Luxembourg (24th March 2020).
Google Scholar
World Input-Output Database (2016), National Input-Output Tables, European Commission, Luxembourg (24th March 2020).
Google Scholar
Wyszkowska-Kuna, J. (2013), Przyczyny mniejszej aktywności firm usługowych w obszarze działalności innowacyjnej, “Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Oeconomica: Gospodarka w okresie globalnego kryzysu”, 281, pp. 401–418.
Google Scholar
Wyszkowska-Kuna, J. (2016), Usługi biznesowe oparte na wiedzy. Wpływ na konkurencyjność gospodarki na przykładzie wybranych krajów Unii Europejskiej, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź,
Google Scholar
Wyszkowska-Kuna, J. (2018), The role of import for KIBS intensity: A comparative analysis of European Union countries, “European Journal of Service Management”, 26 (2), pp. 329–336. https://doi.org/10.18276/ejsm.2018.26-41
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18276/ejsm.2018.26-41
Wyszkowska-Kuna, J. (2019), Productivity Performance of the Service Sectors in European Union Countries, “Comparative Economic Research. Central and Eastern Europe”, 22 (4), pp. 7–22. https://doi.org/10.2478/cer-2019-0029
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/cer-2019-0029
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.