Commentary on Judgement of Supreme Administrative Court (7 Judges) from 18th of March 2019 (I FPS 3/18)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/1509-877X.2023.03.06Keywords:
Supreme Administrative Court, tax, limitation period, delivering of notice, legal representation in tax affairsAbstract
Commentary analysed abovementioned judgement of Supreme Administrative Court which deals with a problem of the effectiveness of delivering to the taxpayer information on the suspension of the limitation period for tax payment as a result of initiation criminal proceedings in connection with the suspicion of committing a crime or a penal fiscal offence. The authors are critical of the arguments used by the court in justifying the judgment.
Downloads
References
Austin J.L., How to Do Things with Words, Oxford 1962.
Google Scholar
Brzeziński B., Kalinowski M., Zawiadomienie podatnika o zawieszeniu biegu terminu przedawnienia wskutek wszczęcia postępowania karnego skarbowego w świetle teorii performatywów, „Studia Iuridica Toruniensia” 2023 [w druku].
Google Scholar
Łukomski Ł., Skuteczność formalna i materialna performatywu, „Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Iuridica” 2015, t. 75, https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6069.75.13
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6069.75.13
Masternak M., Czynności materialno-techniczne jako prawna forma działania administracji publicznej, Toruń 2018.
Google Scholar
Patryas M., Performatywy w prawie, Poznań 2005.
Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
PlumX metrics
