Zagadnienia przestrzenne a postulaty i idee ruchu miast cittaslow

Rafał Blazy

doi:10.18778/1733-3180.17.01

Authors

Rafał Blazy Politechnika Krakowska im. Tadeusza Kościuszki, Wydział Architektury, Instytut Projektowania Miast i Regionów

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-3180.17.01

Keywords:

spatial planning, new quality of life, new urban ideas

Abstract

The Slow City movement or Cittaslow began with an association of four Italian cities in 1999, and is developing very rapidly in Europe and beyond. In Poland at the moment it associates 20 cities. This movement aims at the development of small towns based on criteria designed to respect the quality of life in the spirit of the ideology of „slow life”. Its program contains a prototype system for quantifying factors that determine granting a city the title of Slow City. Such town are to become ideal places for a more hygienic and harmonious way of life, in line with our biological clock. The author made an attempt in this article to look at the philosophy of the movement from the perspective of spatial issues. The text presents selected solutions in the area of spatial planning and urban design in line with the ideological demands of the association.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aug’e M., 1995, Non-places: Introduction to an anthropology of supermodernity, Verso, New York.

Beatley T., 2004, Native to nowhere: Sustaining home and community in a global age, Island Press, Washington, DC.

Campbell M.C., 2004, Building a common table: The role for planning in community food systems, „Journal of Planning Education and Research”, 23, s. 341–355. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X04264916

Castells M., 2008, Społeczeństwo sieci, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.

Ghel J., 2014, Miasta dla ludzi, RAM, Kraków.

Gruszecka-Tieśluk A., 2013, Sieć Cittaslow – strategią rozwoju małych miast w Polsce?, [w:] Nowoczesne instrumenty polityki rozwoju lokalnego – zastosowanie i efekty w małych miastach, „Studia Ekonomiczne”, 144 (2), Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach, s. 383–393.

Hall E.T., 1997, Ukryty wymiar, Muza SA, Warszawa.

Hargreaves A., 2004, Building communities of place: Habitual movement around significant places, „Journal of Housing and the Built Environment”, 19, s. 49–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOHO.0000017706.38123.43

Honor’e C., 2004, In praise of slowness, Harper, San Francisco.

Imbroscio D., 1997, Reconstructing city politics: Alternative economic development and urban regimes, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483327884

Imbroscio D., 1998, Reformulating urban regime theory: The division of labor between state and market reconsidered, „Journal of Urban Affairs”, 20 (3), s. 233–248. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9906.1998.tb00420.x

Imbroscio D., 2003, Overcoming the neglect of economics in urban regime theory, „Journal of Urban Affairs”, 25 (3), s. 271–284. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9906.00165

Imbroscio D., 2004, The imperative of economics in urban political analysis: A reply to Clarence N. Stone, „Journal of Urban Affairs”, 26 (1), s. 21–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0735-2166.2004.00002.x

Innes J., 1998, Information in communicative planning, „Journal of the American Planning Association”, 64 (1), s. 52–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369808975956

Knox P., 2005, Creating ordinary places: Slow cities in a fast world, „Journal of Urban Design”, 10 (1), s. 1–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13574800500062221

Leitner H., Sheppard E., 1999, Transcending interurban competition: Conceptual issues and policy alternatives in the European Union, [w:] Jones A.E.G., Wilson D. (red.), The urban growth machine: Critical perspectives two decades later, State University of New York Press Albany, NY, s. 227–246.

Leyshon A., Lee R., 2003, Introduction: Alternative economic geographies, [w:] Leyshon A., Lee R., Williams C. (red.), Alternative economic spaces, Sage, London, s. 1–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446220825.n1

Mayer H., Knox P.L., 2006, Pace of Life and Quality of Life: The Slow City Charter, [w:] Sirgy J.M., Phillips R., Rahtz D.R. (red.), Community Quality-of-Life Indicators: Best Cases II, Springer, s. 21–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2257-8_2

Mayer H., Knox P.L., 2006, Slow Cities: Sustainable Places in a Fast World, Virginia Tech, „Journal of Urban Affairs”, 28 (4), s. 321–334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9906.2006.00298.x

Międzynarodowy statut miast „Cittaslow”, www.cittaslow.org.

Oldenburg R., 1999, The great good place: Cafes, coffee shops, bookstores, bars, hair salons, and other hangouts at the heart of a community, Marlowe & Company, New York.

Oldenburg R., 2002, Celebrating the third place, Marlowe & Company, New York.

Poczobut J., 2010, Działania rewitalizacyjne w miasteczkach polskiej krajowej sieci miast Cittàslow, „Zeszyty Naukowe Instytutu Spraw Publicznych Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego”, Zarządzanie Publiczne 1–2 (9–10), Kraków, s. 105–119.

Ponadlokalny program rewitalizacji sieci miast Cittàslow 2015.

Putnam R.D., 2000, Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community, Simon & Schuster, New York. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/358916.361990

Smolko R., 2000, The community indicators handbook, Redefining Progress, Oakland, CA.

Stone C., 1989, Regime politics: Governing Atlanta, 1946–1988, „334 II Journal of Urban Affairs II”, 28 (4), Lawrence, KS, University Press of Kansas.

Stone C., 2004a, It’s more than the economy after all: Continuing the debate about urban regimes, „Journal of Urban Affairs”, 26 (1), s. 1–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0735-2166.2004.0001.x

Stone C., 2004b, Rejoinder: Multiple imperatives, or some thoughts about governance in a loosely coupled but stratified society, „Journal of Urban Affairs”, 26 (1), s. 35–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0735-2166.2004.0004.x

Virilio P., 1991, Lost dimension, Semiotext, New York.

Williamson T., Imbroscio D., Alperovitz G., 2003, Making a place for community: Local democracy in a global era, Routledge, New York.