Badanie dyskursu użytkowników języka polskiego z diagnozą afazji mieszanej

Robert Dębski; Paulina Wójcik-Topór; Urszula Malina

doi:10.18778/2544-7238.10.06

Authors

Robert Dębski Uniwersytet Jagielloński, Instytut Glottodydaktyki Polonistycznej, Zakład Logopedii https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7417-8467
Paulina Wójcik-Topór Uniwersytet Jagielloński, Instytut Glottodydaktyki Polonistycznej, Zakład Logopedii https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7245-4381
Urszula Malina Uniwersytet Jagielloński, Instytut Glottodydaktyki Polonistycznej, Zakład Logopedii https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3147-5901

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/2544-7238.10.06

Keywords:

coherence, cohesion, discourse, mixed aphasia, utterance

Abstract

There is still a lack of empirical scientific studies in the literature that focus, in line with the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), on analyses of the discourse cohesion of people affected by aphasia, therefore their continuation seems to be of vital importance. This article presents the results of a study that aims to show the cohesion of speech and its disorders together with the grammatical and lexical means of discourse used by patients with mixed aphasia in relation to the type of aphasia, its severity and genre of discourse, as well as to the speech of healthy people. Free speech and descriptive, narrative and procedural discourse were collected using tasks and scripts from the AphasiaBank international database. After the subjects’ utterances had been transcribed and coded to identify and describe measures of cohesion, they were subjected to qualitative analysis. The quantitative analysis included measuring the number of cohesion measures and their variation. The results of the study confirm previous findings regarding the overproduction of speech of patients with mixed aphasia with a sensory component, which does not mean that the content they communicate is more comprehensible than that of other subjects. The most frequently observed discourse disorders are due to the occurrence of phonemic and semantic paraphrases, and the greatest difficulties are associated with the use of the verb aspect. Studies have shown that tasks using a series of pictures help maintain the sequence of events, and the majority of realisation disruptions are observed during the creation of a free narrative.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Robert Dębski, Uniwersytet Jagielloński, Instytut Glottodydaktyki Polonistycznej, Zakład Logopedii

dr hab. Robert Dębski jako współautor tekstu zmarł w kwietniu 2023.

References

Abdu H., Tadese F., Seyoum G., 2021, Comparison of Ischemic and Hemorrhagic Stroke in the Medical Ward of Dessie Referral Hospital, Northeast Ethiopia: A Retrospective Study, „Neurology Research International”, Vol. 21, 9996958, https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9996958
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9996958

Alary Gauvreau C., Le Dorze G., 2022, Participant reported outcomes of a community of practice about social participation for speech‑language pathologists in aphasia rehabilitation, „Disability and Rehabilitation”, Vol. 44(2), s. 231–242, https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2020.1764116
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2020.1764116

Anderson J.R., 2000, Learning and memory: An integrated approach, Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Google Scholar

Anderson B.W., Kortz M.W., Black A.C., Al Kharazi K.A., 2023, Anatomy, Head and Neck, Skull, Treasure Island: StatPearls Publishing.
Google Scholar

Bigos K., 2020, Badanie rozumienia wypowiedzi w afazji – propozycja metodologiczna, „Logopedia”, t. 49(1), s. 125–151.
Google Scholar

Brady M., Evans J., 2020, Language and Cognitive Rehabilitation after Stroke, [w:] J. Saver, G. Hankey (red.), Stroke Prevention and Treatment: An Evidence‑based Approach, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, s. 501–516, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316286234.025
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316286234.025

Feigin V.L., Brainin M., Norrving B., Martins S., Sacco R.L., Hacke W., Fisher M., Pandian J., Lindsay P., 2022, World Stroke Organization (WSO): Global Stroke Fact Sheet 2022, „International Journal of Stroke: Official Journal of the International Stroke Society”, Vol. 17(1), s. 18–29, https://doi.org/10.1177/17474930211065917
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/17474930211065917

Fridriksson J., Hillis A.E., 2021, Current Approaches to the Treatment of Post‑Stroke Aphasia, „Journal of Stroke”, Vol. 23(2), s. 183–201, https://doi.org/10.5853/jos.2020.05015
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.5853/jos.2020.05015

Goodglass H., Kaplan E., 1972, Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination (BDAE). Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger.
Google Scholar

Hyder A.A., Wunderlich C.A., Puvanachandra P., Gururaj G., Kobusingye O.C., 2007, The impact of traumatic brain injuries: a global perspective, „NeuroRehabilitation”, Vol. 22(5), s. 341–353.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/NRE-2007-22502

Kemp W.J., Tubbs R.S., Cohen‑Gadol A.A., 2012, The Innervation of the Cranial Dura Mater: Neurosurgical Case Correlates and a Review of the Literature, „World Neurosurgery”, Vol. 78(5), s. 505–510, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2011.10.045
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2011.10.045

Leer E. van, Turkstra L., 1999, The effect of elicitation task on discourse coherence and cohesion in adolescence with brain injury, „Journal of Communication Disorders”, Vol. 32, s. 327–349.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9924(99)00008-8

Loban W., 1976, Language Development: Kindergarten through Grade Twelve, Urbana: National Council of Teachers of English.
Google Scholar

Mann W.C., Thompson S., 1987, Rhetorical Structure Theory: A Theory of Text Organization, California: University of Southern California, Information Science Institutes.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1988.8.3.243

Maruszewski M., 1966, Afazja. Zagadnienia teorii i terapii, Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
Google Scholar

Mazur J., 1986, Organizacja tekstu potocznego. Na przykładzie języka polskiego i rosyjskiego, Lublin: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie‑Skłodowskiej.
Google Scholar

Mickiewicz J., Rutkiewicz‑Hanczewska M., Kaźmierski R., 2022, Zaburzenia mowy i języka u pacjentów po przebytym udarze mózgu. Studium epidemiologiczne, „Prace Językoznawcze”, nr 24(2), s. 135–149.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.31648/pj.7739

Miller J.F., Iglesias A., 2012, SALT: Systematic Analysis of Language Transcripts. Software for the analysis of oral language, Middleton: SALT Software, LLC.
Google Scholar

Murphy S.J., Werring D.J., 2020, Stroke: causes and clinical features, „Medicine (Abingdon)”, Vol. 48(9), s. 561–566, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mpmed.2020.06.002
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mpmed.2020.06.002

Oppenheim G.M., Dell G.S., Schwartz M.F., 2010, The dark side of incremental learning: A model of cumulative semantic interference during lexical access in speech production, „Cognition”, Vol. 114(2), s. 227–252, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.09.007
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.09.007

Panasiuk J., 2013, Afazja a interakcja. TEKST – metaTEKST – konTEKST, Lublin: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie‑Skłodowskiej.
Google Scholar

Panasiuk J., 2019, Język a komunikacja w afazji, Lublin: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie‑Skłodowskiej.
Google Scholar

Plowman E., Hentz B., Ellis Jr. C., 2012, Post‑stroke aphasia prognosis: a review of patient‑related and stroke‑related factors, „Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice”, Vol. 18(3), s. 689–694, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01650.x
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01650.x

Prasetyo E., 2020, The primary, secondary, and tertiary brain injury, „Critical Care and Shock”, Vol. 23, s. 4–13.
Google Scholar

Schuchard J., Middleton E.L., 2018, Word repetition and retrieval practice effects in aphasia: Evidence for use‑dependent learning in lexical access, „Cognitive Neuropsychology”, Vol. 35(5–6), s. 271–287, https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2018.1461615
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2018.1461615

Stede M., 2008, Connective‑based Local Coherence Analysis: A Lexicon for Recognizing Causal Relationships, [w:] Conference on Semantics in Text Processing. STEP 2008 Conference Proceedings, Rickmansworth: College Publications, s. 221–237.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3115/1626481.1626499

Syta A., 2019, Dysfunkcje prawej półkuli mózgu a deficyty językowe i komunikacyjne, „Logopedia”, t. 48, s. 79–90, https://doi.org/10.24335/n0ks-2209
Google Scholar

Taboada M., Mann W.C., 2006, Applications of Rhetorical Structure Theory, „Discourse Studies”, Vol. 8(4), s. 567–588.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445606064836

Ulatowska H.K., Allard L., Chapman S.B., 1990, Narrative and Procedural Discourse in Aphasia, [w:] Y. Joanette, H.H. Brownell (red.), Discourse Ability and Brain Damage, New York: Springer, s. 180–198, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3262-9_8
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3262-9_8