Neurobiologia a paradygmat finansów na przełomie XX i XXI wieku

Tomasz Michalski

doi:10.18778/2391-6478.3.47.05

Authors

Tomasz Michalski SGH w Warszawie, Instytut Ryzyka i Rynków Finansowych https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3796-3233

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/2391-6478.3.47.05

Keywords:

Financial Market, Neurobiology, Growth Dogma

Abstract

The purpose of the article. The paper aimed to investigate how the brain functions established through the process of evolution influences decisions regarding the activities of entities on the financial market and how this affects changes in the behavior of these entities on the market. Additionally, it aimed to understand the definitions of basic concepts and thus contribute to changing the financial paradigm.

Methodology. The research uses a method based on a review of literature from fields dealing with the issues raised in the topic, such as behavioral economics, finance, and neurobiology.

Results of the research. It was pointed out that the turn of the 20th and 21st centuries was a period of intensification of phenomena that fostered the emergence of anomalies, thus signaling symptoms of chaos in the financial world. Phenomena such as the information and digital revolution, increasing financialization, and chrematistics were identified, which are, among other things, the result of the implementation of the growth dogma, obligatory for homo oeconomicus for thousands of years. The fact of the progressive departure from ethical and moral values in all types of activities was emphasized. In these conditions, the decisions/actions of entities operating on the financial market cause changes in the understanding of basic concepts to be observed and, consequently, tendencies to change the definitions of these concepts, leading to a departure from the current financial paradigm.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akerlof, G.A, Shiller, R.J. (2017). Złowić frajera. Ekonomia manipulacji i oszustwa. PTE Warszawa.

Sajdak, B. (1997). Pokolenie Y, a metody dydaktyki akademickiej. Kultura i Polityka, 2014/16, s. 12–28.

Bohler, S. (2020). Zachłanny mózg. Wydawnictwo Feeria science. Łódź.

Croxson, P., Kyriazis, D., Baxter, M. (2011). Cholinergic modulation of a specific memory function of prefrontal cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 14, s. 1510–1512. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2971 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2971

Earth Overshoot day 2017 fell on August 2. Earth Overshoot Day.

Harari, Y. N. (2014). Sapiens. Od zwierząt do bogów. PWN Warszawa.

Harari, Y. N. (2015). Homo Deus. Krótka historia jutra. Wydawnictwo literackie.

Harari, Y.N. (2018). 21 lekcji na XXI wiek. Wydawnictwo literackie.

Kandel, E.R. (2020). Zaburzony umysł. Co nietypowe mózgi mówią o nas samych. Copernicus Center Press.

McClure, S. M., Laibson, D. I., Loewenstein, G., Cohen, J. D. (2004). Separate neural systems value immediate and delayed monetary rewards. Science, 306(5695), p. 503–507. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1126/science.1100907 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1100907

Mączyńska, E. (2011). Gdy sługa staje się panem, czyli dysfunkcje pomiaru wartości biznesu i wyników działalności gospodarczej [w:] Czas na pieniądz. Zarządzanie finansami, inwestycje, wycena przedsiębiorstw, zarządzanie wartością, red. D. Zarzecki, Uniwersytet Szczeciński, Szczecin.

Michalski, T. (2021). Innovation, risk and finance paradigm from the polish perspective. International Journal of Innovation Studies. ISSN 2096-2487, s. 107–112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2021.07.002

Michalski, T. (2023). Ryzyko w zmieniającej się rzeczywistości. Sprawcy, przyczyny, skutki [w:] Monografii „30 lat w naukach społecznych. Nowe myśli i idee”. Oficyna wydawnicza SGH, s. 333–352.

Michalski, T., Śliwiński, A. (2015). Paradygmat finansów i nowe ryzyka jako nośniki ryzyka systemowego. Problemy Zarządzania, Vol. 13, Nr 3(55), s. 9–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7172/1644-9584.55.1

Mischel, W. (1958). Preference for delayed reinforcement an experiment study of a cultural observation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, s. 57–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0041895

Mischel, W. (1973). Toward a Cognitive Social Learning Reconceptualization of Personality. Psychological Review. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0035002

Mischel, W., Shoda, Y., Rodrigez, M.L. (1989). Delay of Gratification in Children. Science, vol. 244, s. 933–938. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.2658056

Olds, J., Milner, P. (1954). Positive reinforcement produced by electrical stimulation of septal area and other regions of rat brain. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 47(6), 419–427. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0058775 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0058775

Pigliucci, M. (2019). Bujda na resorach. Jak odróżnić naukę od bredni. PWN, Warszawa.

Piketty, Th. (2015). Kapitał w XXI wiek. Wydawnictwo Krytyki Politycznej, Warszawa.

Raport Brundtland. (1987). Our Common Future. Raport WCED.

Reserve Primary Fund – http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=adtIm6egWjMY

Schneier, F.R., Martinez, D., Abi-Dargham, A., Zea-Ponce, Y., Simpson, H.B., Liebowitz, M.R., Laruelle, M. (2007). Striatal dopamine D2 receptor availability in OCD with and without comorbid social anxiety disorder: preliminary findings. Depression and Anxiety. https://doi.org/10.1002/DA.20268 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/da.20268

Stiglitz, J.E. (2015). Cena nierówności. W jaki sposób dzisiejsze podziały społeczne zagrażają naszej przyszłości?. Wydawnictwo Krytyki Politycznej, Warszawa.

Sztompka, P. (2007). Zaufanie. Fundament społeczeństwa. Znak, Kraków, s. 301.

Taft, J.G. (2012). Stewardship. Lessons learned from the lost culture of Wall Street. John Wiley & Sons.

Ustawa Dodda-Franka – http://www.cftc.gov/ucm/groups/public/@swaps/documents/file/hr4173_enrolledbill.pdf

Williams, G.A, Smith, M.L, Young, C. (2002). Zarządzanie ryzykiem a ubezpieczenia. PWN, Warszawa.