Sustainable disclosures of polish banks – text mining analysis

Authors

  • Martyna Białek-Szkudlarek Instytut Ekspertyz Ekonomicznych i Finansowych w Łodzi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/2391-6478.1.45.04

Keywords:

sustainability reporting, ESG disclosures, text mining, sentiment analysis, readability index, Polish banking sector

Abstract

The purpose of the article. Sustainability development issues, particularly Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) factors, are becoming increasingly relevant in corporate reporting, driven by rising environmental awareness and regulatory requirements. The aim of the study is the evaluation of ESG disclosures of selected Polish banks. The aim of the paper fills a gap in the Polish academic literature in economics and finance by analyzing the volume and size of non-financial ESG disclosures through computer text mining techniques.

Methodology. This study applies text mining techniques to evaluate the ESG volume and size from 107 financial reports issued by Polish banks between 2006 and 2023. For this purpose, selected tools for computer-based analysis of textual data (text mining) are used. The primary methods include the emotional attitude (sentiment), analysis of the number of words regarding ESG, and analysis of the readability of ESG volume and size contained in company reports.

Results of the research. The study reveals that ESG excerpts are more neutral or less optimistic compared to integrated reports, which tend to have a more positive tone. Additionally, sustainability disclosures are written in a complex language, and the volume of these reports has been increasing over time, likely due to new regulations and growing awareness of sustainability issues. The study focuses on Polish banks but suggests expanding future research to other sectors.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abate, G., Basile, I., & Ferrari, P. (2021). The level of sustainability and mutual fund performance in Europe: An empirical analysis using ESG ratings. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(5).
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2175

AA1000 AccountAbility Principles. (n.d.). https://www.accountability.org/standards/aa1000-accountability-principles
Google Scholar

Adhariani, D., & Du Toit, E. (2020). Readability of sustainability reports: Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 10(4), 621–636. https://doi.org/10.1108/jaee-10-2019-0194
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-10-2019-0194

Aerts, W., & Cormier, D. (2008). Media legitimacy and corporate environmental communication. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2008.02.005
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2008.02.005

Albuquerque, R., Koskinen, Y., & Zhang, C. (2019). Corporate social responsibility and firm risk: Theory and empirical evidence. Management Science, 65(10).
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2018.3043

Antweiler, W., & Frank, M. Z. (2004). Is all that talk just noise? The information content of internet stock message boards. The Journal of Finance, 59(3).
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2004.00662.x

Aureli, S., Medei, R., Supino, E., & Travaglini, C. (2016). Sustainability disclosure after a crisis. International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development, 7(1), 35–49. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijsesd.2016010102
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/IJSESD.2016010102

Baborska, B. (1999). The concept of sustainable agriculture: Some theoretical and practical issues. Argumenta Oeconomica, 2(8).
Google Scholar

Baj-Rogowska, A. (2019). Analiza sentymentu jako narzędzie monitorowania wyników finansowych przedsiębiorstwa. Przedsiębiorczość i Zarządzanie, 20(12.1).
Google Scholar

Balicka, A. (2014). Informacje środowiskowe w raportach rocznych przedsiębiorstw branży motoryzacyjnej. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Finanse, Rynki Finansowe, Ubezpieczenia, 69.
Google Scholar

Baranowski, P., Doryń, W., Łyziak, T., & Stanisławska, E. (2021a). Words and deeds in managing expectations: Empirical evidence from an inflation targeting economy. Economic Modelling, 95, 49–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2020.12.003
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2020.12.003

Baranowski, P., Bennani, H., & Doryń, W. (2021b). Do the ECB’s introductory statements help predict monetary policy? Evidence from a tone analysis. European Journal of Political Economy, 66.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2020.101964

Berg, F., Kölbel, J. F., & Rigobon, R. (2022). Aggregate confusion: The divergence of ESG ratings. Review of Finance, 26(6).
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfac033

Bhatore, S., Mohan, L., & Reddy, Y. R. (2020). Machine learning techniques for credit risk evaluation: A systematic literature review. Journal of Banking and Financial Technology, 4(1).
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42786-020-00020-3

Billio, M., Costola, M., Hristova, I., Latino, C., & Pelizzon, L. (2021). Inside the ESG ratings: (Dis)agreement and performance. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(5), 1426–1445. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2177
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2177

Bollen, J., Mao, H., & Zeng, X. (2011). Twitter mood predicts the stock market. Journal of Computational Science, 2(1).
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocs.2010.12.007

Broda, B., Niton, B., Gruszczynski, W., & Ogrodniczuk, M. (2014). Measuring readability of Polish texts: Baseline experiments. In LREC (Vol. 24, pp. 573–580).
Google Scholar

Cao, L., & Tay, F. E. H. (2001). Financial forecasting using support vector machines. Neural Computing & Applications, 10(2).
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s005210170010

Charlin, V., Cifuentes, A., & Alfaro, J. (2022). ESG ratings: An industry in need of a major overhaul. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment [Preprint].
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2022.2113358

Cho, C. H., & Patten, D. M. (2006). The role of environmental disclosures as tools of legitimacy: A research note. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(7–8), 639–647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2006.09.009
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2006.09.009

Delevingne, L., Gründler, A., Kane, S., & Koller, T. (2020, February 12). The ESG premium: New perspectives on value and performance. Insights on Sustainability.
Google Scholar

Directive 2014/95/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2014 amending Directive 2013/34/EU as regards disclosure of non-financial and diversity information by certain large undertakings and groups.
Google Scholar

Dornadula, V. N., & Geetha, S. (2019). Credit card fraud detection using machine learning algorithms. Procedia Computer Science, 165.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.01.057

DuBay, W. H. (2004). The principles of readability. Impact Information.
Google Scholar

Dyllick, T., & Hockerts, K. (2002). Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11(2).
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.323

Escrig-Olmedo, E., Fernández-Izquierdo, M. Á., Ferrero-Ferrero, I., Rivera-Lirio, J. M., & Muñoz-Torres, M. J. (2019). Rating the Raters: Evaluating how ESG Rating Agencies Integrate Sustainability Principles. Sustainability, 11(3), 915. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030915
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030915

European Environment Agency. (2024). Europe’s air quality status 2024. https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/europes-air-quality-status-2024/europes-air-quality-status-2024
Google Scholar

Feldman, R., & Sanger, J. (2007). The text mining handbook: Advanced approaches in analyzing unstructured data. Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511546914

Funk, C., Tönjes, E., & Haas, C. (2024). Exploring the predictive capacity of ESG sentiment on official ratings: A few-shot learning perspective. MAGKS Joint Discussion Paper Series in Economics, 12-2024.
Google Scholar

Gajdka, J., Brzeszczyński, J., Marcinkowska, M., & Kulińska-Sadłocha, E. (2024). Aspekty ESG w działalności banków w Polsce – rozwój, stan obecny, perspektywy. PAB/WIB 1/2024.
Google Scholar

Gentzkow, M., Kelly, B., & Taddy, M. (2019). Text as data. Journal of Economic Literature, 57(3).
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20181020

Gillan, S. L., Koch, A., & Starks, L. T. (2021). Firms and social responsibility: A review of ESG and CSR research in corporate finance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 66.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.101889

Gray, R., Owen, D., & Maunders, K. T. (1987). Corporate social reporting: Accounting and accountability. Prentice-Hall International.
Google Scholar

Hackston, D., & Milne, M. J. (1996). Some determinants of social and environmental disclosures in New Zealand companies. Accounting, Auditing &; Accountability Journal, 9(1).
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09513579610109987

Hotho, A., Nürnberger, A., & Paaß, G. (2005). A brief survey of Text Mining. Journal for Language Technology and Computational Linguistics, 20(1).
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.21248/jlcl.20.2005.68

Hristov, I., & Searcy, C. (2024). Integrating sustainability with corporate governance: A framework to implement the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive through a balanced scorecard. Management Decision.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-10-2023-1995

Huang, X., Hong Theo, S., & Zhang, Y. (2014). Tone Management. The Accounting Review, 89(3).
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50684

International Organization for Standardization. (2024). ISO 26000:2010 – Guidance on social responsibility. https://www.iso.org/standard/42546.html
Google Scholar

IUCN. (1980). World conservation strategy: Living resource conservation for sustainable development.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.CH.1980.9.en

Iwińska-Knop, K., & Krystyańczuk, H. (2016). Wykorzystanie Big Data w badaniu wizerunku marki w świadomości konsumentów. Ekonomika i Organizacja Przedsiębiorstwa, 9, 28–42.
Google Scholar

Janicka, M., & Miziołek, T. (2022). Finanse zrównoważone: ESG–Przedsiębiorstwa–Sektor finansowy. Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne.
Google Scholar

Jędrzejka, D. (2014). Ujawnienia ESG polskich spółek giełdowych w świetle wyników badań. Studia Ekonomiczne, 186, 13–26.
Google Scholar

Kiliç, M., Kuzey, C., & Uyar, A. (2015). The impact of ownership and board structure on corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting in the Turkish banking industry. Corporate Governance, 15(3), 357–374.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-02-2014-0022

Klimczak, K. M., & Dynel, M. (2016). Linguistic attributes of equity analysts’ reports. Financial Sciences, 1(26), 9–19.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.15611/nof.2016.1.03

Klimczak, K. M., Hadro, D., & Meyer, M. (2023). Executive communication with stakeholders on sustainability: The case of Poland. Accounting in Europe, 20(3), 305–331.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480.2023.2213242

Kocoń, J., Miłkowski, P., & Zaśko-Zielińska, M. (2019, November). Multi-level sentiment analysis of PolEmo 2.0: Extended corpus of multi-domain consumer reviews. In Proceedings of the 23rd Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL) (pp. 135–146).
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/K19-1092

Korniichuk, R., & Simiński, R. (2017). Wspomaganie prognozowania wpływu tekstów reklamowych z wykorzystaniem systemu Promovot. Studia Informatica, 38(2), 57–69.
Google Scholar

Kosztowniak, A. (2024). The impact of ESG regulations and taxonomy on the credit process in commercial banks. Finanse i Prawo Finansowe, 2(42), 78–95.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/2391-6478.2.42.05

Kotsantonis, S., & Serafeim, G. (2019). Four things no one will tell you about ESG data. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 31(2), 50–58.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jacf.12346

Koyuncugil, A. S., & Ozgulbas, N. (2012). Financial early warning system model and data mining application for risk detection. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(6), 6238–6253. https://doi.org/[DOI]
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.12.021

KPMG Poland. (2022). ESG w wycenie przedsiębiorstw. https://kpmg.com/pl/pl/home/insights/2022/08/esg-w-wycenie-przedsiebiorstw.html
Google Scholar

Kryk, B. (2017). Informacje środowiskowe w sprawozdaniach z działalności. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, (479), 108–117.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.15611/pn.2017.479.10

Krzysztofek, A. (2016). Dyrektywa 2014/95/UE oraz wynikające z niej zmiany / Directive 2014/95/EU, and changes resulting from it. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, 450, 89–101.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.15611/pn.2016.450.29

Lament, M. (2017). Raportowanie informacji niefinansowych w zakładach ubezpieczeń w Polsce. Zeszyty Teoretyczne Rachunkowości, 91, 45–63.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0009.8024

Landi, G. C., Iandolo, F., Renzi, A., & Rey, A. (2022). Embedding sustainability in risk management: The impact of environmental, social, and governance ratings on corporate financial risk. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(4).
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2256

Landi, G., & Sciarelli, M. (2019). Towards a more ethical market: The impact of ESG rating on corporate financial performance. Social Responsibility Journal, 15(1).
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-11-2017-0254

Liu, B. (2010). Sentiment analysis and subjectivity. In N. Indurkhya & F. J. Damerau (Eds.), Handbook of Natural Language Processing (2nd ed., pp. 1–38). Chapman and Hall/CRC.
Google Scholar

Łopacińska, L., & Wnuk, U. (2014). Analiza indeksu mglistości tekstu w raportach ewaluacyjnych strategicznych programów badawczych w obszarze innowacji technicznych. e-mentor, 5(57), 45–53.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.15219/em57.1141

Kaźmierczak, M. (2022). A literature review on the difference between CSR and ESG. Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology, Organization and Management Series, 2022(162), 275–289. https://doi.org/10.29119/1641-3466.2022.162.16
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.29119/1641-3466.2022.162.16

Majchrzak, I., & Nadolna, B. (2020). Environmental information in the consolidated financial statements of selected energy companies in Poland – a comparative analysis. Zeszyty Teoretyczne Rachunkowości, 110(166), 89–107.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0014.5551

Meler, A. (2023). Parlamentarne ćwierkanie o pandemii. Analiza sentymentu tweetów parlamentarzystów publikowanych podczas pierwszych 12 miesięcy pandemii koronawirusa w Polsce. Studia Socjologiczne, 2(245), 57–82.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.24425/sts.2022.141425

Miralles-Quirós, M. M., Miralles-Quirós, J. L., & Redondo Hernández, J. (2019). ESG performance and shareholder value creation in the banking industry: International differences. Sustainability, 11(5), 1405.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11051404

Mroczkowski, R., Rybak, P., Wróblewska, A., & Gawlik, I. (2021). HerBERT: Efficiently pretrained transformer-based language model for Polish. In Proceedings of the 8th Workshop on Balto-Slavic Natural Language Processing (BSNLP) (pp. 120–134).
Google Scholar

Nugroho, D. P. D., Hsu, Y., Hartauer, C., & Hartauer, A. (2024). Investigating the interconnection between environmental, social, and governance (ESG), and corporate social responsibility (CSR) strategies: An examination of the influence on consumer behavior. Sustainability, 16(2), 3421. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16020614
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16020614

Othman, I. W., Hasan, H., Tapsir, R., Rahman, N. A., Tarmuji, I., Majdi, S., Masuri, S. A., & Omar, N. (2012). Text readability and fraud detection. 2012 IEEE Symposium on Business, Engineering and Industrial Applications, 72–77.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ISBEIA.2012.6422890

Peng, Y., Wang, G., Kou, G., & Shi, Y. (2011). An empirical study of classification algorithm evaluation for financial risk prediction. Applied Soft Computing, 11(2), 2906–2915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2010.11.028
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2010.11.028

Primec, A., & Belak, J. (2022). Sustainable CSR: Legal and managerial demands of the new EU legislation (CSRD) for the future corporate governance practices. Sustainability, 14(24), 16530
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416648

Rostek, K., & Młodzianowski, D. (2017). Współzależność informacji sieciowych oraz zmian indeksów zachodzących na Giełdzie Papierów Wartościowych w Warszawie. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Przyrodniczo-Humanistycznego w Siedlcach, 42(115), 89–104.
Google Scholar

Ruggerio, C. A. (2021). Sustainability and sustainable development: A review of principles and definitions. Science of The Total Environment, 786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147481
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147481

Rybiński, K. (2020). The forecasting power of the multi-language narrative of sell-side research: A machine learning evaluation. Finance Research Letters, 34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2019.08.009
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2019.08.009

Samonas, M. (2015). Financial forecasting, analysis, and modelling: A framework for long-term forecasting. John Wiley & Sons.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118921111

Senave, E., Jans, M. J., & Srivastava, R. P. (2023). The application of text mining in accounting. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2023.100624
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2023.100624

Sheffield, P. E., & Landrigan, P. J. (2010). Global climate change and children’s health: Threats and strategies for prevention. Environmental Health Perspectives, 119(3), 291–298. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1002233
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1002233

Smeuninx, N., De Clerck, B., & Aerts, W. (2016). Measuring the readability of sustainability reports: A corpus-based analysis through standard formulae and NLP. International Journal of Business Communication, 57(1), 52–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488416675456
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488416675456

Social Accountability International. (2024). SA8000 Standard. https://sa-intl.org/programs/sa8000/
Google Scholar

Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571. https://doi.org/10.2307/258788
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/258788

Tetlock, P. C. (2007). Giving content to investor sentiment: The role of media in the stock market. The Journal of Finance, 62(3).
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2007.01232.x

Thuiller, W., Lavorel, S., Araújo, M. B., Sykes, M. T., & Prentice, I. C. (2005). Climate change threats to plant diversity in Europe. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(23), 8245–8250. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0409902102
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0409902102

Trocka, M. (2023). Raportowanie informacji związanych z klimatem na przykładzie banków. Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny, 85(2). https://doi.org/10.14746/rpeis.2023.85.2.15
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/rpeis.2023.85.2.15

UNIDO. (n.d.). What is CSR? United Nations Industrial Development Organization. https://www.unido.org/our-focus-advancing-economic-competitiveness-competitive-trade-capacities-and-corporate-responsibility-corporate-social-responsibility-market-integration/what-csr
Google Scholar

Wilkinson, A., Hill, M., & Gollan, P. (2001). The sustainability debate. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21(12).
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570110410865

Wójcik-Jurkiewicz, M. (2020). Non-financial reporting of banks from a socially responsible perspective – examples from wig-ESG. Zeszyty Teoretyczne Rachunkowości, 108(164).
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0014.3603

World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future. Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Wypych, M. (2018). Efektywność inwestycji w spółki społecznie odpowiedzialne. Przedsiębiorczość i Zarządzanie, 19(10, cz. 1), 553–569.
Google Scholar

Xing, F. Z., Cambria, E., & Welsch, R. E. (2017). Natural language-based financial forecasting: A survey. Artificial Intelligence Review, 50(1), 49–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-017-9588-9
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-017-9588-9

Yoon, J., Han, S., Lee, Y., & Hwang, H. (2023). Text mining analysis of ESG management reports in South Korea: Comparison with Sustainable Development Goals. SAGE Open, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231202896
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231202896

Zou, X., Jiang, J., Zhang, H., & He, H. (2024). ESG performance, media coverage, and brand value. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 37(4). https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-04-2024-0441
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-04-2024-0441

Zumente, I., & Bistrova, J. (2021). ESG importance for long-term shareholder value creation: Literature vs. practice. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7020127
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7020127

Downloads

Published

2025-03-31

How to Cite

Białek-Szkudlarek, M. (2025). Sustainable disclosures of polish banks – text mining analysis. Journal of Finance and Financial Law, 1(45), 73–91. https://doi.org/10.18778/2391-6478.1.45.04

Issue

Section

Article