Regulatory Deficiencies in Investor Protection on the CFD Market in Poland

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/2391-6478.2.46.05

Keywords:

CFD, ESMA, MIFID II, Capital markets

Abstract

The purpose of the article. Retail investors in capital markets have enhanced accessibility to a broad spectrum of financial instruments via online trading platforms operated by investment firms. However, these instruments are inherently complex and high-risk, making independent analysis and informed decision-making particularly challenging for non-professional investors. Leveraged products amplify both gains and losses, posing heightened risks in volatile markets like cryptocurrencies. This article critically examines the limitations of the current regulatory framework governing contracts for difference (CFDs) in Poland, following regulations introduced (Decision No. DAS.456.2.2019) by the Polish Financial Supervision Authority (KNF). This decision established restrictions on the offering, distribution, and sale of CFDs to retail clients.

Methodology. This study adopts a regulatory and market analysis approach to identify critical deficiencies and challenges in investor protection within the Polish CFD market. It relies on a review of legal frameworks, supervisory reports, and publicly available data from CFD brokers. Key areas of analysis include supervisory reports from the KNF, assessment of risk disclosures, examination of brokerage models, evaluation of cross-border activities, and review of marketing strategies.

Results of the research. The analysis highlights persistent issues such as the circumvention of restrictions by cross-border brokers, the continued use of aggressive marketing strategies, and unresolved conflicts of interest within brokerage models. By reviewing legal frameworks, reports, and CFD broker data highlights regulatory shortcomings in investor protection. The findings suggest that while regulatory interventions have introduced certain protective measures, significant loopholes allow brokers to maintain high-risk practices. The article calls for enhanced regulatory oversight and provides recommendations for strengthening investor protection in the Polish financial market.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Act on Trading. (2005). The Act of 29 July 2005 on Trading in Financial Instruments. Dz.U. 2005, nr 183 poz. 1538. https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=wdu20051831538
Google Scholar

Amendment of Act on Trading. (2014). The Act of 5 December 2014 amending the Act on trading in financial instruments and certain other acts. Dz.U. 2015, poz. 73. https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/download.xsp/WDU20150000073/T/D20150073L.pdf
Google Scholar

AMF. (2019). Decision restricting the marketing, distribution, or sale, in France or from France, of contracts for differences to retail investors. https://www.amf-france.org/en/amfs-decision-1-august-2019-restricting-marketing-distribution-or-sale-france-or-france-contracts
Google Scholar

AvaSocial. (n.d.). AvaSocial trading platform. https://www.avatrade.com/trading-platforms/avasocial
Google Scholar

BaFin. (2020). Risks of CFDs – every other provider fails to comply with the requirements. https://www.bafin.de/SharedDocs/Veroeffentlichungen/EN/Fachartikel/2020/fa_bj_2011_CFD_en.html
Google Scholar

Barnes, P. (2018). Recent developments in investment fraud and scams: Contracts for Difference (‘CFD’), spread betting and binary options and foreign exchange (‘Forex’) sometimes collectively known as ‘forbin’ – the UK experience. Munich Personal RePEc Archive, No. 85061. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/85061/
Google Scholar

Barszczewski, J. (2024, October 13). About copy trading on behalf of UKNF. https://x.com/JMBarszczewski/status/1796550397487731107
Google Scholar

Brown, C., Dark, J., & Davis, K. (2010). Exchange traded contracts for difference: Design, pricing, and effects. Journal of Futures Markets, 30(12), 1108–1149. https://doi.org/10.1002/fut.20475
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/fut.20475

CSIRT KNF. (2023). Annual report CSIRT KNF 2023. KNF. https://cebrf.knf.gov.pl/images/Raport_roczny_CSIRT_KNF.pdf
Google Scholar

CNMV. (2023). Resolution on CFDs (July 11, 2023). https://www.cnmv.es/docportal/aldia/Resolucion_CFD_en.pdf
Google Scholar

eToro. (n.d.). CopyTrader. https://www.etoro.com/en/copytrader/
Google Scholar

European Commission. (2016). Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/565 of 25 April 2016 supplementing Directive 2014/65/EU. Official Journal of the European Union, L 87/1. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32017R0565
Google Scholar

European Commission. (2023). Retail investment strategy. https://finance.ec.europa.eu/publications/retail-investment-strategy_en
Google Scholar

ESMA. (2016). Warning on CFDs, binary options, and other speculative products. ESMA/2016/1166. https://www.esma.europa.eu/sites/default/files/library/2016-1166_warning_on_cfds_binary_options_and_other_speculative_products_0.pdf
Google Scholar

ESMA. (2018a). Decision (EU) No 2018/796 to temporarily restrict contracts for differences in the Union. Official Journal of the European Union, L 136/50. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32018X0601%2802%29
Google Scholar

ESMA. (2018b). Press release: ESMA agrees to prohibit binary options and restrict CFDs to protect retail investors. https://www.esma.europa.eu/sites/default/files/library/esma71-98-128_press_release_product_intervention.pdf
Google Scholar

ESMA. (2018c). Notice of ESMA’s product intervention (first) renewal decision in relation to contracts for differences. https://www.esma.europa.eu/document/cfd-renewal-decision-notice
Google Scholar

ESMA. (2019a). Notice of ESMA’s product intervention (second) renewal decision in relation to contracts for differences. https://www.esma.europa.eu/document/cfd-renewal-decision-2-notice
Google Scholar

ESMA. (2019b). Notice of ESMA’s product intervention (third) renewal decision in relation to contracts for differences. https://www.esma.europa.eu/document/cfd-renewal-3-notice
Google Scholar

ESMA. (2020). Technical advice to the EC on product intervention. https://www.esma.europa.eu/sites/default/files/library/esma35-43-2134_technical_advice_to_the_ec_on_product_intervention.pdf
Google Scholar

ESMA. (2022a). Peer review on supervision of cross-border activities of investment firms: Peer review report. https://www.esma.europa.eu/sites/default/files/library/esma42-111-5534_report_peer_review_cross_border_activities_investment_firms.pdf
Google Scholar

ESMA. (2022b). ESMA finds shortcomings in supervision of cross-border investment activities and issues specific recommendations to CySEC. https://www.esma.europa.eu/press-news/esma-news/esma-finds-shortcomings-in-supervision-cross-border-investment-activities-and
Google Scholar

ESMA. (2023). Supervisory briefing on supervisory expectations in relation to firms offering copy trading services. https://www.esma.europa.eu/sites/default/files/2023-03/ESMA35-42-1428_Supervisory_Briefing_on_Copy_Trading.pdf
Google Scholar

ESMA. (2024a). TRV Risk Monitor: ESMA report on trends, risks and vulnerabilities. No. 1, 2024. https://www.esma.europa.eu/sites/default/files/2024-01/ESMA50-524821-3107_TRV_1-24_risk_monitor.pdf
Google Scholar

ESMA. (2024b). TRV Risk Monitor: Statistical annex. No. 1, 2024. https://www.esma.europa.eu/sites/default/files/2024-01/ESMA50-524821-3106_TRV_1-24_Statistical_annex.pdf
Google Scholar

ESMA. (2024c). Requirements when posting investment recommendations on social media. https://www.esma.europa.eu/press-news/esma-news/requirements-when-posting-investments-recommendations-social-media
Google Scholar

FSMA. (2016). Regulation of the Financial Services and Markets Authority governing the distribution of certain derivative financial instruments to retail clients. https://www.fsma.be/sites/default/files/legacy/sitecore/media%20library/Files/fsmafiles/wetgeving/reglem/en/reglem_26-05-2016.pdf
Google Scholar

Forex Forum Navigator. (2015). Discussion form 2015. https://forex-nawigator.biz/forum/dzwignia-t1780-180.html
Google Scholar

Gołębiowski, P. (2012). Kontrakty na różnice kursowe (CFDs). Przegląd Prawa Handlowego, 6, 26–35. https://sip.lex.pl/komentarze-i-publikacje/czasopisma/kontrakty-na-roznice-kursowe-cfds-151144472
Google Scholar

IDM. (2016). Comments of the Chamber of Brokerage Houses on the document “Guidelines on the provision of brokerage services on the OTC derivatives market”. https://idm.com.pl/wpcontent/uploads/2016/02/160210-_Uwagi%20do%20Wytycznych%20KNF%20%20OTC%20instr.%20pochodnych.pdf
Google Scholar

IDM. (2019). Badanie wpływu interwencji produktowej ESMA na inwestorów. https://idm.com.pl/images/2017/aktualnosci/Wyniki%20Badania%20wpywu%20interwencji%20produktowej%20ESMA%20na%20inwestorw.pdf
Google Scholar

KNF. (2016). Guidelines concerning the provision of brokerage services on the OTC derivatives market. https://www.knf.gov.pl/knf/pl/komponenty-/img/wytyczne%20otc_24_43962.05_43962.2016_43962.pdf
Google Scholar

KNF. (2019). Decision No. DAS.456.2.2019. https://dziennikurzedowy.knf.gov.pl/DU_KNF/2019/27/akt.pdf
Google Scholar

Mackiewicz, P. (2016). ECN, STP czy MM, czyli czy broker na rynku FOREX może mieć wpływ na osiągane wyniki. https://www.sii.org.pl/9847/analizy/newsroom/ecn-stp-czy-mm-czyli-czy-broker-na-rynku-forex-moze-miec-wplyw-na-osiagane-wyniki.html
Google Scholar

MiFID II. (2014). Directive 2014/65/EU on markets in financial instruments. Official Journal of the European Union, L 173, 349–496. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32014L0065
Google Scholar

Mosionek, P. (2020). Rodzaje brokerów FOREX – ECN, STP, MM. https://forexclub.pl/rodzaje-brokerow-ecn-stp-mm/
Google Scholar

Mosionek, P. (2024). eToro Opinie i recenzja | Platforma social tardingowa. https://forexclub.pl/etoro-opinie-recenzja-platformy/
Google Scholar

NIK. (2017). Ochrona praw nieprofesjonalnych uczestników rynku walutowego (forex, kantorów internetowych i rynku walut wirtualnych) KBF.430.011.2016. https://www.nik.gov.pl/plik/id,12996,vp,15405.pdf
Google Scholar

Pelser, M. (2024). Leverage constraints and investors’ choice of underlying. Journal of Banking & Finance, 162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2024.107150
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2024.107150

Sobol, M., & Szmelter, A. (2022). Nierzeczywiste transakcje terminowe – czynniki rozwoju i struktura rynku. Przegląd Prawa Ekonomicznego, 1, 112–113. https://doi.org/10.31743/ppe.12882
Google Scholar

Solanki, J. (2024). STP Broker vs ECN Broker Explained. https://admiralmarkets.com/education/articles/general-trading/types-of-brokers-ecn-stp
Google Scholar

UKNF. (2013). Position on the conduct of investment firms in the Forex market. https://www.knf.gov.pl/knf/pl/komponenty/img/stanowisko_Forex_35192.pdf
Google Scholar

UKNF. (2020). Position on selected aspects of the provision of investment advisory services by investment firms and banks referred to in Article 70 section 2 of the Act. https://www.knf.gov.pl/knf/pl/komponenty/img/Stanowisko_UKNF_ws_doradztwa_inwestycyjnego.pdf
Google Scholar

UKNF. (2023). Position of UKNF on referral programs and partnership programs. https://www.knf.gov.pl/knf/pl/komponenty/img/Stanowisko_UKNF_ws_programow_polecen_oraz_programow_partnerskich_84269_84429.pdf
Google Scholar

UKNF. (2024a). Results of clients in the Forex market for 2023. https://www.knf.gov.pl/?articleId=88644&p_id=18
Google Scholar

UKNF. (2024b). Position of UKNF on the use of copy trading. https://www.knf.gov.pl/knf/pl/komponenty/img/Stanowisko_UKNF_dot_wykorzystania_copy_tradingu_przy_swiadczeniu_uslug_maklerskich_89502_89507.pdf
Google Scholar

XTB. (2024). Annual report: Report of the XTB Capital Group for Q1 2024. https://ircdn.xtb.com/files/2024/05/08235443/Raport-Q1.2024-PL.pdf
Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2025-06-30

How to Cite

Jarosz, W., & Górny, M. (2025). Regulatory Deficiencies in Investor Protection on the CFD Market in Poland. Journal of Finance and Financial Law, 2(46), 73–96. https://doi.org/10.18778/2391-6478.2.46.05

Issue

Section

Article