On Social Emergence: A Non-Dichotomous Approach to Qualitative Tool Design

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8069.20.1.03

Keywords:

reproduction, emergence, inflections, biographical narrative interview, interview about the present

Abstract

The narrative biographical interview is a research tool that has been successfully used to study the reproductions of the overall constellations of social life that occur within an individual life. The entire methodological proposal as well as the issue of reproduction are based on a dichotomous epistemology. In the presented article, we analyse this issue of reproduction as it appears in Fritz Schütze’s work. Next, we describe a proposal for an alternative narrative interview – interview about the present based on a non-dichotomous epistemology. In our opinion, this epistemological perspective addresses the issue of reproduction in a completely different way. And, more importantly it introduces in the field of sociology an issue of emergence. To illustrate this non-dichotomous logics, we are using the material from one of the interviews from the research data collection.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Kamila Biały, University of Lodz, Poland

Sociologist (Department of Sociology of Art, University of Lodz), Gestalt therapist; her area of interest is epistemology, methodology, and ethics as pertaining to sociological problems inspired by contemporary phenomenology.

Piotr F. Piasek, Central China Normal University

Sociologist and philosopher (the Central China Normal University); his scientific interests include the ontological and epistemological problems of social sciences (phenomenology, systems theories).

References

Biały Kamila, Piasek Piotr F. (2022), Towards Non-Dichotomous Sociology: A Phenomenologically Inspired Epistemological Analysis, “Avant”, vol. 13(2), https://doi.org/10.26913/avant.2202214
Google Scholar

Francesetti Gianni (2015), From individual symptoms to psychopathological fields. Towards a field perspective on clinical suffering, “British Gestalt Journal”, vol. 24(1), pp. 5–19.
Google Scholar

Francesetti Gianni, Roubal Jan (2020), Field Theory in Contemporary Gestalt Therapy, Part 1: Modulating the Therapist’s Presence in Clinical Practice, “Gestalt Review”, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 113–136.
Google Scholar

Meillassoux Quentin (2007), Potentiality and Virtuality, “Collapse”, vol. II, pp. 55–81.
Google Scholar

Philippson Peter (2022), The “Active Principle” in Gestalt Therapy and Other Essays, Manchester: Peter Philippson.
Google Scholar

Perls Frederic, Hefferline Ralph, Goodman Paul (1951), Gestalt Therapy: Excitement and Growth in the Human Personality, London: Profile Books.
Google Scholar

Robine Jean-Marie (2013), Anxiety Within the Situation: Disturbances of Gestalt Construction, [in:] Gianni Francesetti, Michela Gecele, Jan Roubal (eds.), Gestalt Therapy In Clinical Practice – From Psychopathology To The Aesthetics Of Contact, Gestalt Therapy Book Series, Milano: FrancoAngeli, pp. 479–493.
Google Scholar

Schütze Fritz (2016), Biography Analysis on the Empirical Base of Autobiographical Narratives: How to Analyse Autobiographical Narrative Interviews, [in:] W. Fiedler, H.-H. Krüger (eds.), Sozialwissenschaftliche Prozessanalyse: Grundlagen der qualitativen Sozialforschung, Opladen–Berlin–Toronto: Verlag Barbara Budrich, pp. 75–116, https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvdf09cn.7
Google Scholar

Spagnuolo Lobb Margherita (2017), From losses of ego functions to the dance steps between psychotherapist and client. Phenomenology and aesthetics of contact in the psychotherapeutic field, “British Gestalt Journal”, vol. 26(1), pp. 28–37.
Google Scholar

Waldenfels Bernhard (2011), Phenomenology of the Alien. Basic Concepts, Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Google Scholar

Zinker Joseph (1977), Creative Process in Gestalt Therapy, New York: Vintage.
Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2024-02-28 — Updated on 2024-03-14

Versions

How to Cite

Biały, K., & Piasek, P. F. (2024). On Social Emergence: A Non-Dichotomous Approach to Qualitative Tool Design. Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej, 20(1), 40–55. https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8069.20.1.03 (Original work published February 28, 2024)

Issue

Section

Numer tematyczny „Subjectivity, Projectivity, Biography in the Face of Changes in Late-Modern Society” edited by Kamila Biały, Piotr F. Piasek & Paweł Pieniążek

Funding data