What Is It All About in the Interview? An Attempt to Interpret the Memories About the Jews as Narratives of Identity

Authors

  • Sławomir Kapralski Uniwersytet Pedagogiczny w Krakowie, Instytut Filozofii i Socjologii, ul. Podchorążych 2, 30-084 Kraków

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8069.11.4.01

Keywords:

Interpretation of Interview, Memory, Narrative of Identity, Jews, Antisemitism

Abstract

The article presents a method of interpreting in-depth interviews regarding the ways in which non-Jewish Poles remember Jews. The intention of the suggested method is to find a new perspective that would be complementary to the two most important ones that can be found in the Polish research on this subject: the ethnographic approach and the perspective inspired by psychoanalysis. The main assumption of the presented method is that an interview is not a recollection of the past but a narrative of identity in which the past is (re)constructed according to the imperatives of the present in which the interview is conducted, and the Jews serve to an interviewee only as a frame of reference for his/her constructs of identity. It is further assumed that narratives of identity are constructed along four main dimensions: sacrum, death, sex, and power/violence, each with its own cultural semantics and binary code that is used to separate practices and beliefs that characterize “Us” from those we attribute to “Them.” These codes, together with stories about “Us” and “Them,” make the warp and weft of the narrative identity represented in the interview, which corresponds to Clifford Geertz’s idea of culture as the webs of significance we have spun and in which we are entangled. Then, a single interview has been selected and interpreted to show how the interviewee organizes his stories about Jews in different semantics and codes to keep his narrative of identity consistent.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Sławomir Kapralski, Uniwersytet Pedagogiczny w Krakowie, Instytut Filozofii i Socjologii, ul. Podchorążych 2, 30-084 Kraków

Sławomir Kapralski, dr hab. prof. UP. Jego zainteresowania naukowe to: teoria socjologiczna, antropologia kulturowa, pamięć społeczna, tożsamości zbiorowe, etniczność i nacjonalizm, Holokaust, antysemityzm, społeczności romskie.

References

Bauman Zygmunt (1992) Mortality, Immortality, and Other Life Strategies. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Google Scholar

Benz Wolfgang (2004) Anti-Semitism in Europe. Traditions, Structures, Manifestations. Uppsala: Uppsala University.
Google Scholar

Burke Peter J. (2013) Identity, Social [w]: Byron Kaldis, ed., Encyclopedia of Philosophy and the Social Sciences, vol. 1. Los Angeles: Sage, s. 453–457.
Google Scholar

Cała Alina (1987) Wizerunek Żyda w polskiej kulturze ludowej. Warszawa: Uniwersytet Warszawski.
Google Scholar

Cała Alina (1992) Wizerunek Żyda w polskiej kulturze ludowej. Warszawa: Wydawnictwa UW.
Google Scholar

Forecki Piotr (2010) Od „Shoah” do „Strachu”. Spory o polsko-żydowską przeszłość i pamięć w debatach publicznych. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Poznańskie.
Google Scholar

Geertz Clifford (1973) The Interpretations of Culture. New York: Basic Books.
Google Scholar

Grabowski Jan (2011) Judenjagd. Polowanie na Żydów 1942‒1945. Studium dziejów pewnego powiatu. Warszawa: Stowarzyszenie Centrum Badań nad Zagładą Żydów.
Google Scholar

Kapralski Sławomir (1999) People of Different Times [w:] tenże, ed., The Jews in Poland, vol. 2. Kraków: Judaica Foundation.
Google Scholar

King Anthony (2004) The Structure of Social Theory. London: Routledge.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203646694

Kurowski Marek M. (2004) Paradoks i ironia, czyli krótki kurs socjologii Niklasa Luhmanna. „Rubikon. Kwartalnik Naukowy” nr 1‒4, s. 79–98.
Google Scholar

LaCapra Dominick (2001) Writing History, Writing Trauma. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Google Scholar

Lynch Michael (1993) Scientific Practice and Ordinary Action. Ethnomethodology and Social Studies of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511625473

Ricoeur Paul (2003) O sobie samym jako innym. Przełożył Bogdan Chełstowski. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Google Scholar

Roskies Diane K., Roskies David G. (1979) The Shtetl Book. An Introduction to East European Jewish Life and Lore. Jersey City, NJ: KTAV Publishing House.
Google Scholar

Schütz Alfred (1962) Common-Sense and Scientific Interpretation of Human Action [w:] tenże, Collected Papers, vol. 1: The Problem of Social Reality. The Hague: Nijhoff, s. 3–47.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2851-6_1

Skarga Barbara (1997) Tożsamość i różnica. Eseje metafizyczne. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Znak.
Google Scholar

Stomma Ludwik (1986) Antropologia kultury wsi polskiej XIX w. Warszawa: Instytut Wydawniczy PAX.
Google Scholar

Tokarska-Bakir Joanna (2004) Rzeczy mgliste. Eseje i studia. Sejny: Pogranicze.
Google Scholar

Tokarska-Bakir Joanna (2008) Legendy o krwi. Antropologia przesądu. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo W.A.B.
Google Scholar

Vaitkus Steven (1991) How Is Society Possible? Dordrecht: K luwer Academic Publishers.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2077-4

Waldenfels Bernhard (2002) Topografia obcego. Przełożył Janusz Sidorek. Warszawa: Oficyna Naukowa.
Google Scholar

White Harrison C. (2011) Tożsamość i kontrola. Przełożyła Agnieszka Hałas. Kraków: Nomos.
Google Scholar

Yerushalmi Yosef H. (1996) Zakhor: Jewish History and Jewish Memory. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
Google Scholar

Published

2015-11-30

How to Cite

Kapralski, S. (2015). What Is It All About in the Interview? An Attempt to Interpret the Memories About the Jews as Narratives of Identity. Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej, 11(4), 6–33. https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8069.11.4.01

Issue

Section

Articles