The Importance of Subjectively Constructed Meaning: Integration Viewed From the Perspective of Immigrants
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8069.11.3.07Keywords:
subjective meaning, integration, migration, biographical experiences, autobiographical narrative interviewsAbstract
In political discourse, as much as in social studies, the term integration is commonly viewed in the context of migration. On the basis of ‘objective’ indicators and statistical analysis, the level of integration is measured and assessed as ‘low’ or ‘high’, ‘sufficient’ or ‘insufficient’. This is the perspective of the receiving countries (not migrants), which clearly dominates in this field of study. Seeing this perspective as partial, we decided to ask migrants themselves what integration means to them. The analysis of the narrative interviews conducted with Ukrainian, Srilankese and Senegalese men and women living in the South of Italy has demonstrated that integration for them is more related to the notion of ‘good life’ than to a desire of becoming ‘one of us’.2 Our interviewees’ approach to integration is very pragmatic as pursuing their own life projects, even if they turn out to be relatively modest, is after all their main concern. From their narratives emerges an idea of integration as acceptance and satisfaction, but without aspirations for equality, participation and full social and political rights, which calls for more active integration policies.
Downloads
References
Ager, Alistair and Alison Strang. 2004. “Indicators of Integration: Final Report.” London: Home Office.
Google Scholar
Ager, Alistair and Alison Strang. 2008. “Understanding Integration: A Conceptual Framework.” Journal of Refugee Studies 21(2):166-191.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/fen016
Ambrosini, Maurizio. 2011. Sociologia delle migrazioni [Sociology of Migration]. Bologna: Il Mulino.
Google Scholar
Anthias, Floya; Kontos, Maria and Mirjana Morokvasic-Mrokva (eds.). 2013. Paradoxes of Integration: Female Migrants in Europe. Heidelerg, New York, London: Springer.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4842-2
Appadurai, Arjun. 2004. “The Capacity to Aspire: Culture and the Terms of Recognition.” Pp. 59-84 in Culture and Public Action, edited by V. Rao and M. Walton. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Google Scholar
Archer, Margaret S. 2000. Being Human. The Problem of Agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511488733
Archer, Margaret S. 2003. Structure, Agency and the Internal Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139087315
Archer, Margaret S. 2007. Making our Way through the World: Human Reflexivity and Social Mobility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618932
Bogdan, Robert and Biklen, Sari K. 1998. Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theory and Method. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Google Scholar
Cebolla-Boado, Hector and Claudia Finotelli. 2015. “Is There a North–South Divide in Integration Outcomes? A Comparison of the Integration Outcomes of Immigrants in Southern and Northern Europe.” European Journal of Population 31(1):77-102.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-014-9327-8
Cekiera, Rafał. 2014. O pułapkach emigracyjnej lekkości. Doświadczenie tymczasowości w narracjach młodych polskich emigrantów poakcesyjnych [On the Traps of Migration Lightness: The Experience of Temporariness in the Narratives of Young Polish Migrants]. Cracow: „Nomos.”
Google Scholar
Dilthey, Wilhelm. 1962 [1924]. Pattern and Meaning in History: Thoughts on history and society. New York: Harper & Brothers.
Google Scholar
Domecka, Markieta et al. 2012. “Method in practice: Autobiographical narrative interviews in search of European Phenomena.” Pp. 21-44 in The Evolution of European Identities: Biographical Approaches, edited by R. Miller, G. Day. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137009272_2
Erdal, Marta B. 2013. “Migrant Transnationalism and Multi-Layered Integration: Norwegian-Pakistani Migrants’ Own Reflections.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 39(6):983-999.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2013.765665
Kearns, Ade and Elise Whitley. 2015. “Getting There? The Effects of Functional Factors, Time and Place on the Social Integration of Migrants.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, published online 15 April 2015, pp. 1-25. Retrieved August 24, 2015 http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1369183X.2015.1030374?-journalCode=cjms20#.VdrY7KZn4UU
Google Scholar
Kindler, Marta; Ratcheva, Vesselina and Maria Piechowska. 2015. Social networks, social capital and migrant integration at local level. European literature review. IRiS Working Paper Series, No. 6/2015. Birmingham: Institute for Research into Superdiversity.
Google Scholar
Kohli, Martin. 1981. “Biography: account, text, method.” Pp. 61-75 in Biography and Society. The Life History Approach in the Social Sciences, edited by D. Bertaux. Beverly Hills: SAGE.
Google Scholar
Lacroix, Chantal. 2010. Immigrants, Literature and National Integration. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230281219
Mandich, Giuliana. 2012. “Il futuro quotidiano. Habitus, riflessività e capacità di aspirare” [“The Everyday Future: Habitus, reflexivity and the capacity to aspire”]. Pp. 19-30 in Il futuro nel quotidiano. Studi sociologici sulla capacit di aspirare” [The Future of the Everyday: Sociological studies on the capacity to aspire], edited by O. De Leonardis, M. Deriu. Milano: Egea.
Google Scholar
Näre, Lena. 2013. “Migrancy, Gender and Social Class in Domestic Labour and Social Care in Italy: An Intersectional Analysis of Demand.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 39(4):601-623.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2013.745238
Näre, Lena. 2014. “Agency as capabilities: Ukrainian women’s narratives of social change and mobility.” Women’s Studies International Forum 47:223-231.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2014.10.013
Penninx, Rinus. 2007. “Integration Processes of Migrants: Research Findings and Policy Challenges.” Migration and Ethnic Themes [Migracijske i etniiii teme] 12:7-32.
Google Scholar
Penninx, Rinus. 2010. “European research on international migration and settlement of immigrants: a state of the art and suggestions for improvement.” Pp. 21-39 in Migration in a Globalised World: New research issues and prospects, edited by C. Audebert, M. Kamel Dorai. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press/ IMISCOE.
Google Scholar
Pugliese, Enrico. 2002. Lugliese tra migrazioni internazionali e migrazioni interne [Italy between International and Internal Migrations]. Bologna: Il Mulino.
Google Scholar
Schütze, Fritz. 2005 [1984]. “Cognitive Figures of Autobiographical Extempore Narration.” Pp. 289-338 in Biographical Research Methods, edited by R. Miller. London: SAGE.
Google Scholar
Schütze, Fritz. 2008. “Biography Analysis on the Empirical Base of the Autobiographical Narratives: How to Analyse Autobiographical Narrative Interviews”, Parts I & 2, INVITE – Biographical Counselling in Rehabilitative Vocational Training. Further Educational Curriculum. EU Leonardo da Vinci Programme.
Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya. 1984. Resources, Values and Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar
Simmel, Georg. 1972. “The Sociological Significance of the ‘Stranger’.” Pp. 322–327 in Introduction to the Science of Sociology, edited by E.W. Burgess, R.E. Park. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar
Spanò, Antonella (ed.). 2011. Esistere, coesistere, resistere. Progetti di vita e processi di identificazione dei giovani di origine straniera a Napoli [To Exist, to Co-Exist and to Resist: Life projects and identification processes of young people of foreign origin]. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
Google Scholar
Spanò, Antonella and Markieta Domecka. 2014. “Cosa significa l’integrazione? Quando a rispondere sono gli immigrati” [“What does the integration mean? When the ones to respond are the immigrants”]. Pp. 215-236 in Uno come te. Europei e nuovi europei nei percorsi di integrazione [One Like You: Europeans and New Europeans on their Paths of Integration], edited by P. Donadio, G. Gabrielli, M. Massari. Milano: Collana Fondazione-ISMU, FrancoAngeli.
Google Scholar
Spanò, Antonella and Anna Maria Zaccaria. 2003. “Il mercato delle collaborazioni domestiche a Napoli: il caso delle ucraine e delle polacche” [“The market of domestic collaboration: The case of Ukrainian and Polish women”]. Pp. 193-224 in Percorsi migratori tra reti etniche, istituzioni e mercato del lavoro [Migration Paths Among Ethnic Networks, Institutions and Labour Market], edited by M. La Rosa, L. Zanfrnini. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
Google Scholar
Strauss, Anselm L. 1987. Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511557842
Wingens, Matthias et al. (eds.). 2011. A Life-Course Perspective on Migration and Integration. Heidelberg, London, New York: Springer.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1545-5
Zincone Giovanna (ed.). 2000. Primo Rapporto sull’integrazione degli immigrati in Italia [The First Report on Immigrants’ Integration in Italy]. Commissione per le politiche di integrazione degli immigrati. Bologna: Il Mulino.
Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.