Acting for the Local Community: Hybrid Ethnography in the Careers of Local Culture Animators

Rafał Wiśniewski; Grażyna Pol

doi:10.18778/1733-8069.17.3.09

Authors

Rafał Wiśniewski Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, National Centre for Culture, Poland https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7952-8021
Grażyna Pol National Centre for Culture, Poland https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5329-360X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8069.17.3.09

Keywords:

culture animator, diary method, hybrid ethnography, spatial analysis, social role, career

Abstract

This article focuses on the innovative methodology used to collect data. We describe how we have utilized the diary method and what analytical potential it contains. We also flag the limitations we have perceived during the research. At the same time, so as not to refrain entirely from a discussion of the study findings, we recreate selected shared attributes in the careers of culture animators. A hybrid research method was used to report and interpret the reality of our surroundings. This involved the use of a diary in which the animators described facts and events from the previous day while also plotting data concerning their location on the Google map; they enriched their notes with short essays, pictures, and video clips. Then, the animators as subjects in the research took part in one-on-one in-depth interviews to summarize their experience. Deliberations on the utility and innovativeness of these ethnographic methods are accompanied by considerations as to the variety of experience held by culture animators and the factors driving their occupational choices.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Rafał Wiśniewski, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, National Centre for Culture, Poland

Rafał Wiśniewski, sociologist, cultural manager; Director of the National Centre for Culture, professor at the Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw; does research and publishes on the sociology of culture and intercultural communication.

Grażyna Pol, National Centre for Culture, Poland

Grażyna Pol, graduate of sociology at the University of Warsaw; Deputy Director of the Department of Research and Analysis at the National Centre for Culture. The author’s research interests focus on the methodology of social sciences and the sociology of culture.

References

Bales Kevin 1994. Early innovations in social research: the Poverty Survey of Charles Booth (PhD). London School of Economics.
Google Scholar

Becker, Howard S. and James Carper. 1956. “The Development of Identification with an Occupation.” The American Journal of Sociology 61:289-298.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/221759

Blau Peter M. 1964. Exchange and Power in Social Life New York: Wiley.
Google Scholar

Bucholc, Marta. 2018. Miejsce poza pojemnikiem. Wstęp do polskiego wydania Socjologii przestrzeni Martiny Löw. Warsaw: University of Warsaw Press.
Google Scholar

Cialdini, Robert. 1995. Wywieranie wpływu na ludzi: teoria i praktyka. Gdansk: Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne.
Google Scholar

Domecka, Markieta and Adam Mrozowicki. 2008. “Robotnicy i ludzie biznesu. Wzory karier zawodowych a zmiana społeczna in Poland.” Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej 4(1):136-155.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8069.4.1.06

Dudkiewicz, Magdalena and Marek Dudkiewicz. 2017. Raport z badania liderów kultury w subregionie radomskim. Warsaw: Fundacja Obserwatorium.
Google Scholar

Fatyga, Barbara. 2014. “Cultural animator [Animator kultury].” In Słownik Teorii Żywej Kultury. Retrieved September 15, 2020 http://ozkultura.pl/wpis/2800/5
Google Scholar

Ferenc, Tomasz. 2001. “Socjologia obrazu, socjologia fotografii - praktyki badawcze.” Przegląd Socjologiczny/ Sociological Review 50(2):81-99.
Google Scholar

Fuller, Martin G. and Martina Löw. 2017. “Introduction: An invitation to spatial sociology.” Pp. 469-491 in Current Sociology Monograph 4/65. Sage.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392117697461

Gibson, Barbara et al. 2013. “The Integrated Use of Audio Diaries, Photography, and Interviews in Research with Disabled Young Men.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 12(1):382-402.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691301200118

Godlewski, Grzegorz et al. 2002. Animacja Kultury. Doświadczenie i przyszłość. Warsaw: Institute of Polish Culture at the University of Warsaw.
Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving. 1961. Asylums. Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates. New York: Anchor Books.
Google Scholar

Gregory, Derek and John Urry, eds. 1985. Social Relations and Spatial Structures. London: Macmillan.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-27935-7

Hall, Edward. 1976. Ukryty wymiar. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo PIW.
Google Scholar

Homans, George. 1967. The nature of social science, New York.
Google Scholar

Hughes, Everett C. 1958. Men and their work. Toronto: Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press.
Google Scholar

Konecki, Krzysztof. 1988. “Praca w koncepcji socjologii interakcjonistycznej.” Studia Socjologiczne 1/1988:225-245.
Google Scholar

Konecki, Krzysztof. 2012. “Wizualna teoria ugruntowana. Podstawowe zasady i procedury.” Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej 8(1):12-45.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8069.8.1.02

Kozinets, Robert. 2006. “Netnography 2.0.” Pp. 129-142 in Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods in Marketing, edited by R. Belk. Cheltenham, UN, Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Google Scholar

Krause, Ewa. 2012. Rozwój kariery zawodowej studentów. Konteksty i dokonania. Bydgoszcz: Publishing House of the Kazimierz Wielki University.
Google Scholar

Krzysztofek, Kazimierz and Radosław Bomba. 2011. “Będziemy żyć pod cyfrowym niebem….” Culture and History 19/2011. Retrieved March 11, 2021 http://www.kulturaihistoria.umcs.lublin.pl/archives/2400
Google Scholar

Latour, Bruno. 2010. Splatając na nowo to, co społeczne. Wprowadzenie do teorii aktora-sieci. Cracow: Universitas Publishing House.
Google Scholar

Laughland, Andrew and Lia Kvavilashvili. 2018. “Should participants be left to their own devices? Comparing paper and smartphone diaries in psychological research.” Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition 7(4):552-563.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.09.002

Logan, John R. 2012. “Making a Place for Space: Spatial Thinking in Social Science.” Annual Review of Sociology 38:507-524.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-071811-145531

Löw, Martina. 2018. Socjologia przestrzeni. Warsaw: Publishing House of the University of Warsaw.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.31338/uw.9788323533320

Malinowski, Bronisław. 2007. Dziennik w ścisłym znaczeniu tego wyrazu. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Literackie.
Google Scholar

Nowak, Marek. 2015. Teoria nieracjonalnego działania. Socjologiczne studium na temat wolontariatu i społecznego aktywizmu. Poznan: Wydawnictwo UAM.
Google Scholar

Nowosielski, Michał and Marek Nowak. 2008. Jak badać społeczeństwo obywatelskie? Doświadczenia praktyków. Poznan: Wydawnictwo UAM.
Google Scholar

Nóżka, Marcjanna and Natalia Martini. 2015. “Metody mobilne i wizualne w praktyce badawczej: zastosowanie fotospaceru w socjologicznych badaniach map mentalnych i zachowań terytorialnych ludzi.” Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej 11(4):34-50.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8069.11.4.02

Olechnicki, Krzysztof. 1999. “Obraz i wizualność w naukach społecznych.” Kultura i społeczeństwo 3:39-71.
Google Scholar

Ossowska, Maria. 2020. Ethos rycerski i jego odmiany. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Google Scholar

Pink, Sarah. 2008. “Walking with video.” Visual Studies 22(3):240-252.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14725860701657142

Poczykowski, Radosław. 2006. “Między socjologią a kartografią, czyli: mapa w głowie ER(R)GO.” Teoria–Literatura– Kultura 2(13):9-21.
Google Scholar

Przybylski, Liz 2020. Hybrid Etnography. Online, Offline, and in Between. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
Google Scholar

Rodríguez-Amat, Joan R. and Cornelia Brantner. 2016. “Space and place matters: A tool for the analysis of geolocated and mapped protests.” SAGE- new media and society 6(18):1027-1046.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814552098

Seim, Josh. 2019. Hybrid Ethnography: Mixing Participant Observation and Observant Participation. Speech at a conference American Sociological Association.
Google Scholar

Simmel, Georg. 1997. “The sociology of space.” Pp. 137-170 in Simmel on Culture, edited by D. Frisby and M. Featherstone. London: SAGE.
Google Scholar

Stage, Carsten, Bridgit Eriksson, and Camilla M. Reestorf. 2019. “Understanding cultural participation through participation – inventiveness, multivalence and epistemic modernization.” Cultural Trends 1(29):19-34.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09548963.2019.1692183

Stańczak, Gregory C., ed. 2007. Visual Research Methods Image, Society, and Representation. Thousand Oaks, New Delhi, London, Singapore: Sage Publications.
Google Scholar

Šveda, Martin and Michala Madajová. 2015. “Merging diaries and GPS records: The method of data collection for spatio-temporal research.” Moravian Geographical Reports 2(23):12-25.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/mgr-2015-0007

Weber, Max. 2002. Gospodarka i społeczeństwo. Warsaw: PWN.
Google Scholar

Weber, Max. 2011. Etyka protestancka i duch kapitalizmu. Warsaw: University of Warsaw Publishing House.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.31338/uw.9788323528135

Voilmy, Dimitri, Zbigniew Smoreda, and Cezary Ziemlicki. 2008. “Geolocation and Video Ethnography: Capturing Mobile Internet used by a Commuter.” Mobilities 3(2):201-222.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17450100802095304

Wiśniewski, Rafał 2012. “W przestrzeni kultury i natury. Kilka uwag wstępnych o praktykach społecznych i świadomości ekologicznej.” Politeja 20(2):155-169.
Google Scholar

Wiśniewski, Rafał et al. 2021. Oswajając zmienność. Kultura lokalna z perspektywy domów kultury. Warsaw: National Centre for Culture.
Google Scholar

Żuchowska-Zimnal, Gabriela. 2013. “Socjologia wizualna kluczem do (samo)poznania.” Półrocznik Nauka i Szkolnictwo Wyższe 1(41):100-116.
Google Scholar