Governance of biomedical research – the perspective of international collaboration
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-600X.45.10Keywords:
Global bioethics, ethical governance, regulation, research collaboration, informed consent, People’s Republic of China, EuropaAbstract
The issues addressed in the article concern international ethical standards of research, which are carried out in the field of life sciences. Thanks to the applications of the mapping method, key ethical challenges of international research have been distinguished and main currents in the critical verification of global ethics have been described. Moreover, the suggestion about tactics and its applications, which seems to be essential in our times according to the ethical challenges arising from the field of intercontinental biotechnological collaboration, have been made.
References
Abraham J., Reed T. (2003), Reshaping the Carcinogenic Risk Assessment of Medicines: International Harmonisation for Drug Safety, Industry/Regulator Efficiency or Both?, „Social Science and Medicine”, Vol. 57, No. 2, s. 195‒204.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00339-8
Alora T., Lumitao J. M. (2001), Beyond a Western Bioethics: Voices from the Developing World, University Press, Georgetown.
Google Scholar
Angell M. (1997), The Ethics of Clinical Research in the Third World, „New England Journal of Medicine”, Vol. 337, No. 12, s. 847‒849.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199709183371209
Bharadwaj A., Glasner P. (2009), Local Cells, Global Science: The Rise of Embryonic Stem Cell Research in India, Routledge, London.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203891032
Bhutta Z. (2004), Standards of Care in Research Should Reflect Local Conditions and Not the Best Western Standards, „British Medical Journal”, Vol. 329, s. 1114‒1115.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.329.7475.1114
BIONET: Aims of BIONET (2006a), http://www.lse.ac.uk/researchAndExpertise/units/BIONET/about.htm, 22.02.2013.
Google Scholar
BIONET: BIONET Partners (2006b), http://www.lse.ac.uk/researchAndExpertise/units/BIONET/partners.htm, 22.02.2013.
Google Scholar
BIONET. Ethical Governance of Biological and Biomedical Research: Chinese-European Co-operation (2009), http://www.lse.ac.uk/researchAndExpertise/units/BIONET/Default.htm, 22.02.2012.
Google Scholar
China Trials 2008 (2008), Global Clinical Development Summit, http://www.chinatrialsevent.com/, 22.02.2013.
Google Scholar
Crane J. (2010), Adverse Events and Placebo Effects: African Scientists, HIV, and Ethics in the ‘Global Health Sciences’, „Social Studies of Science”, Vol. 40, No. 6, s. 843‒870.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312710371145
De Vries R., Turner L., Orfali K., Bosk C. (eds.) (2007), The View from Here: Bioethics and the Social Sciences, Blackwell, Oxford.
Google Scholar
De Costa A., D’Souza N., Krishnan S., Chhabra M. S., Shihaam I., Goswami K. (2004), Community Based Trials and Informed Consent in Rural North India, „Journal of Medical Ethics”, Vol. 30, s. 318‒323.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2002.001065
Geissler P. W., Kelly A., Imoukhuede B., Pool R. (2008), “He Is Now Like a Brother, I Can Even Give Him Some Blood” – Relational Ethics and Material Exchanges in a Malaria Vaccine “Trial Community” in The Gambia, „Social Science and Medicine”, Vol. 67, No. 5, s. 696‒707.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.02.004
Geissler P. W., Molyneux C. (eds.) (2011), Evidence, Ethos and Experiment. The Anthropology and History of Medical Research in Africa, Berghahn Books, Oxford.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26530/OAPEN_478050
Gottweis H. (red.) (2009), Biopolitics in Asia, „New Genetics and Society”, Vol. 28, No. 3.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14636770903162411
Hall D. (1991), The Research Imperative and Bureaucratic Control: The Case of Clinical Research, „Social Science and Medicine”, Vol. 32, No. 3, s. 333‒342.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(91)90112-P
Jasanoff S. (2007), Designs on Nature. Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States, University Press, Princeton.
Google Scholar
Łaska-Formejster A. (2010), Problemy i dylematy etyczne badań klinicznych w kontekście współpracy międzynarodowej: Europa ‒ Chiny, [w:] J. Kopka, G. Matuszak (red.), Problemy współczesnej demokracji i moralności, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź, s. 263‒279.
Google Scholar
Łaska-Formejster A. (2012), Problemy i dylematy etyczne badań biomedycznych w kontekście realizacji projektu „BIONET”, [w:] J. Mariański, D. Walczak-Duraj (red.), Ład czy bezład moralny ‒ ku społeczeństwu bez moralności?, „Acta Universitatis Lodziensis”, Folia Sociologica 40, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź, s. 253‒273.
Google Scholar
Molyneux C. S., Geissler P. W. (2008), Ethics and the Ethnography of Medical Research in Africa, „Social Science and Medicine”, Vol. 67, No. 5, s. 685‒695.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.02.023
Molyneux C. S., Wassenaar D. R., Peshu N., Marsh K. (2005), “Even if They Ask You to Stand by a Tree All Day, You Will Have to Do It (Laughter)!” – Community Voices on the Notion and Practice of Informed Consent for Biomedical Research in Developing Countries, „Social Science and Medicine”, Vol. 61, No. 2, s. 443‒454.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.12.003
Ong A., Chen N. (eds.) (2010), Asian Biotech: Ethics and Communities of Fate, Duke University Press, Durham.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822393207
Participatory Governance and Institutional Innovation: The New Politics of Life, Summary Report of the PAGANINI Project (2007), University of Vienna, Vienna.
Google Scholar
Petryna A. (2007), Clinical Trials Offshored: On Private Sector Science and Public Health, „BioSocieties”, Vol. 2, s. 21‒40.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1745855207005030
Petryna A. (2009), When Experiments Travel: Clinical Trials and the Global Search for Human Subjects, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400830824
Recommendations on Best Practice in the Ethical Governance of Sino-European Biological and Biomedical Research Collaborations (2010), BIONET Expert Group Report, London School of Economics, London, http://www2.lse.ac.uk/BIOS/research/BIONET/, 22.02.2013.
Google Scholar
Regulations on Ethical Review of Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects (2007), Ministry of Health, People’s Republic of China, Beijing.
Google Scholar
Resnik D. (1998), The Ethics of HIV Research in Developing Nations, „Bioethics”, Vol. 12, No. 4, s. 286‒306.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8519.00118
Sleeboom-Faulkner M. (2009), Human Genetic Biobanks in Asia: Politics of Trust and Scientific Advancement, Routledge, London.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203884607
Sleeboom-Faulkner M., Hwang S. (2012), Governance of Stem Cell Research: Public Participation and Decision-making in China, Japan, South Korea and Taiwan, „Social Studies of Science”, October, Vol. 42, s. 684‒708. doi: 10.1177/0306312712450939.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312712450939
Sleeboom-Faulkner M. (ed.) (2010), Frameworks of Choice: Predictive and Genetic Testing in Asia, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5117/9789089641656
Sunder Rajan K. (2006), Biocapital: The Constitution of Postgenomic Life, Duke University Press, Durham.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822388005
Tangwa G. B. (1996), Bioethics: An African Perspective, „Bioethics”, Vol. 10, No. 3, s. 183‒200.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8519.00020
Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights (2005), UNESCO, http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=31058&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html, 22.02.2013.
Google Scholar
Wahlberg A. (2012a), Emerging Biotechnology Trends, http://www.healthtechnica.com/blogsphere/2011/04/04/emerging-biotechnology-trends, 22.02.2013.
Google Scholar
Wahlberg A. (2012b), Top 5 Strategies for Emerging Biotech Companies, http://www.bio.org/articles/top-5–strategies-emerging-biotech-companies-0, 22.02.2013.
Google Scholar
Wahlberg A., Rehmann-Sutter Ch., Sleeboom-Faulkner M., Lu G., Döring O., Cong Y., Laska-Formejster A., He J., Chen H., Gottweis H., Rose N. [2013], From Global Bioethics to Ethical Governance of Biomedical Research Collaborations, „Social Science & Medicine”, Vol. 98, s. 293–300.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.03.041
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

