The application of generalising judgements and their influence on the images of selected Polish columnists (a constructivism-focussed quantitative and qualitative approach)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/1505-9057.43.13Słowa kluczowe:
competences, columnist, column, discourse analysis, imageAbstrakt
The goal of the text was to indicate the image characteristics of an author of a verbal expression which were communicated through expressing generalising judgements, and to establish the difference between such generalisations depending on the given image characteristic. I used constructivism as the leading theory. In terms of methodology, I applied mixed methods: quantitative (quasi-experiment) and discourse analysis. The analysis indicated that generalisations are used for communicating the characteristics of: intelligent, critical, bluntly states her/his bold judgements, insightful, writes in an interesting way, realist, frank, while the receivers assign some of the characteristics depending on the degree of evaluation emphasis, reference to a taboo, utilisation of negation, and expressions using the 1st person plural.
Pobrania
Bibliografia
Awdiejew A., Habrajska G., “Obrazy ideacyjne w interpretacji tekstu”, in: “Rozmowy o komunikacji 5. Kategorialne aspekty komunikacji”, G. Habrajska (ed.), Primum Verbum, Lodz 2011, pp. 57–66.
Google Scholar
Babbie E., “The Practice of Social Research”, 9th. ed., Wadsworth/Thomson Learning, Belmont, CA 2001.
Google Scholar
Barańska-Szmitko A., “Image from Words. What do Authors of Columns Communicate about Themselves to their Readers?”, Humanities & Social Sciences Review 2014, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 67–74.
Google Scholar
Barańska-Szmitko A., “Means of Communicating an Image of Being ‘Engaged’ and ‘A Realist’ in Newspaper Columns: Results of Empirical Research”, Humanities and Social Sciences Review 2016, Vol. 6, No.1, pp. 127–136.
Google Scholar
Barańska-Szmitko A., “The Capacities and Limitations of the Newspaper Column as a Tool for Creating the Image of Its Author”, Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Litteraria Polonica 2016, No. 5 (35), pp. 115–129.
Google Scholar
Barańska-Szmitko A., “The Capacities and Limitations of the Newspaper Column as a Tool for Creating the Image of Its Author”, Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Litteraria Polonica, 2016, No. 5 (35), p. 115–129.
Google Scholar
Corbett E.P.J., Connors R.J., “Classical Rhetoric for the Modern Student”, 4th ed., Oxford University Press, New York 1998.
Google Scholar
Creswell J.W., “Research design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches”, 4th ed., Sage, Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington D.C. 2014.
Google Scholar
Dąbrowska A., “Zmiany obszarów podlegających tabu we współczesnej kulturze”, in: “Język a Kultura. Tom Jubileuszowy. Tom 20”, A. Dąbrowska (ed.), Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego, Wroclaw 2008, pp. 173–196.
Google Scholar
Fleischer M., “Obszar tabu w systemie polskiej kultury”, in: “Literatura, kultura, komunikacja. Księga Pamiątkowa ku czci Profesora Jerzego Jastrzębskiego w 60. rocznicę urodzin”, M. Graszewicz, K. Stasiuk (eds.), Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego, Wroclaw 2006, pp. 283–300.
Google Scholar
Fleischer M., “Konstrukcja rzeczywistości 2”, Wydawnictwo Atut, Wroclaw 2008.
Google Scholar
Fleischer M., “Ogólna teoria komunikacji”, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego, Wroclaw 2008.
Google Scholar
Fleischer M., “Typologia komunikacji”, Primum Verbum, Lodz 2012.
Google Scholar
Flick U., “Designing Qualitative Research”, Sage, Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington D.C. 2007.
Google Scholar
Goffman E., “The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life”, Anchor Books, New York 1959.
Google Scholar
Hovland L.C., Weiss C.W., “The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness”, Public Opinion Quarterly 1951, Issue 15, pp. 635–650.
Google Scholar
Leary M., “Self-presentation: Impression Management And Interpersonal Behavior”, Westview Press, Boulder 1996.
Google Scholar
Malhotra N., Hall J., Shaw M., Oppenheim P., “Marketing Research: An applied orientation”, 3rd ed., Pearson Education Australia Pry Ltd., New South Wales, Australia 2005.
Google Scholar
Miodunka W., “Teoria pól językowych. Społeczne i indywidualne ich uwarunkowania”, PWN, Warsaw 1982.
Google Scholar
Pisarek W., “Eksperyment – metoda nie tylko fonetyczna”, Biuletyn PTJ 1969, Vol. 28, pp. 181–188.
Google Scholar
White H.A., Andsager J.L., “Newspaper Column Readers’ Gender Bias: Perceived Interest and Credibility”, Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, Vol. 68, Issue 4, 1991, pp. 709–718.
Google Scholar
Wilson A., Johns R., Miller K.W., Pentecost R., “Marketing research: an integrated approach: solving business problems. The value of marketing research”, Pearson Education Australia Pry Ltd., New South Wales, Australia 2010.
Google Scholar
Hołownia S., “Hotelowa Biblia”, Wprost 2013, Issue 9, p. 39.
Google Scholar
Hołownia S., “Nie zarazić się złem”, Rzeczpospolita 2013, Issue 23, p. 2.
Google Scholar
Hołownia S., “O. Rydzyk jest naszym lustrem”, Newsweek 2012, Issue 20, p. 31.
Google Scholar
Hołownia S., “To nie piekarnia”, Wprost 2013, Issue 11, p. 69.
Google Scholar
Środa M., “Kościół błądzi”, Wprost, 2013, Issue 16, p. 45.
Google Scholar
Środa M., “O Polkę niepodległą!”, Wprost 2013, Issue 11, p. 53.
Google Scholar
Środa M., “Ofensywa rynsztoka pod skrzydłami PiS”, Wprost 2013, Issue 22, p. 42.
Google Scholar
Środa M., “Rzecz o myśleniu”, Wprost 2012, Issue 19, p. 44.
Google Scholar
Środa M., “Świat na opak wywrócony!”, Wprost 2013, Issue 20, p. 19.
Google Scholar
Varga K., “Klątwa Klossa, czyli ofiary adoracji”, Duży Format 2012, Issue 75, p. 23.
Google Scholar
Varga K., “Ocieranie się, czyli sztuka słuszna i niska”, Duży Format 2013, Issue 219, p. 3.
Google Scholar
Varga K., “Trzech kumpli czyli upiorna Mitteleuropa”, Duży Format 2012, Issue 124, p. 24.
Google Scholar
Zaremba P., “Hrabia Fredro krzepi”, Sieci 2013, Issue 18, p. 51.
Google Scholar
Zaremba P., “Serialowy powrót kanibala”, Sieci 2013, Issue 16–17, p. 77.
Google Scholar
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Jak cytować
Numer
Dział
