This is an outdated version published on 2023-12-07. Read the most recent version.

Analysis of phonological control indicators in reference to the proposal contained in CEFR Companion Volume (2020)

Authors

Adriana Prizel-Kania Uniwersytet Jagielloński, Wydział Polonistyki, Instytut Glottodydaktyki Polonistycznej https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6072-5482

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/0860-6587.30.07

Keywords:

phonological control, indicators, pronunciation, prosodic features

Abstract

The first part of the article discusses the proposed description of phonological control which has been added and further developed in the updated version of CEFR Companion Volume (2020). In the first version of the document (CEFR 2001), phonological control was defined, but its development and impact on foreign language proficiency did not attract wider glottodidactic reflection. There was also a lack of indicators in relation to individual levels of language proficiency. This article proposes a Polish translation of the scale of phonological control proficiency set out in CEFR–CV, which consists of overall phonological control, sound articulation, and prosodic features. The second part of the article contains an analysis of these indicators and a polemic with the new proposal for describing phonological proficiency, with reference to psycholinguistic research and glottodidactic practice.

References

Berko Gleason J., Bernstein Ratner N., 2005, Psycholingwistyka, Gdańsk.
Google Scholar

Biernacka M., 2016, Znajdź z polskim wspólny język. Fonetyka w nauczaniu języka polskiego jako obcego. Poradnik metodyczny, Łódź.
Google Scholar

Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment – Companion Volume with New Descriptors [CEFR–CV], 2020, Strasbourg.
Google Scholar

De Meo A., 2012, How credible is a non-native speaker? Prosody and surroundings, w: M.G. Busà, A. Stella (red.), Methodological Perspectives on Second Language Prosody. Papers from ML2P 2012, s. 3–9.
Google Scholar

Elkhafaifi H., 2005, Listening comprehension and anxiety in the Arabic language classroom, „Modern Language Journal”, nr 89 (2), s. 206–220. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2005.00275.x
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2005.00275.x

Europejski system opisu kształcenia językowego – uczenie się, nauczanie, ocenianie [ESOKJ], 2003, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Gluszek A., Dovidio J.F., 2010a, Speaking with a nonnative accent: Perceptions of bias, communication difficulties, and belonging in the United States, „Journal of Language and Social Psychology”, nr 29 (2), s. 224–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X09359590
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X09359590

Gluszek A., Dovidio J.F., 2010b, The way they speak: A social psychological perspective on the stigma of nonnative accents in communication, „Personality and Social Psychology Review”, nr 14(2), s. 214–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309359288
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309359288

Horwitz E.K., Horwitz M.B., Cope J., 1986, Foreign language classroom anxiety, „The Modern Language Journal”, nr 70 (2), s. 125–132.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1986.tb05256.x

Horowitz E.K., 1991, Wstęp, w: E.K. Horwitz, D.J. Young (red.), Language Anxiety: From Theory and Research to Classroom Implications, Nowy Jork, s. xiii–xiv.
Google Scholar

Horowitz E.K., Young D.J., 1991, Language anxiety: from theory and research to classroom implications, New Jersey.
Google Scholar

Kramsch C., 1997, Guest Column: The Privilege of the Nonnative Speaker, „PMLA”, nr 112(3), s. 359–369. https://doi.org/10.2307/462945
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1632/S0030812900060673

Kuhl P.K., 2007, Język, umysł i mózg: doświadczenie zmienia percepcję, w: B. Bokus, G.W. Shugar (red.), Psychologia języka dziecka. Osiągnięcia, nowe perspektywy, Gdańsk, s. 34–62.
Google Scholar

Lev-Ari S., Keysar B., 2010, Why don’t we believe non-native speakers? The influence of accent on credibility, „Journal of Experimental Social Psychology”, nr 46(6), s. 1093–1096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.05.025
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.05.025

Prizel-Kania A., 2017, Psycholingwistyczne i biologiczne podstawy nauczania wymowy, „Języki Obce w Szkole”, nr 2, s. 4–7.
Google Scholar

Ramírez Verdugo D., 2005, The nature and patterning of native and non-native intonation in the expression of certainty and uncertainty: Pragmatic effects, „Journal of Pragmatics”, nr 37/12, s. 2086–2115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.02.012
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.02.012

Thorne S., 2005, Accent Pride and Prejudice: Are Speakers of Stigmatized Variants Really Less Loyal?, „Journal of Quantitative Linguistics”, nr 12(2–3), s. 151–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/09296170500172460
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09296170500172460

Downloads

PDF (Język polski)

Published

2023-12-07

Versions

2024-02-16 (2)
2023-12-07 (1)

How to Cite

Prizel-Kania, A. (2023). Analysis of phonological control indicators in reference to the proposal contained in CEFR Companion Volume (2020). Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Kształcenie Polonistyczne Cudzoziemców, 30, 105–116. https://doi.org/10.18778/0860-6587.30.07