Comparison of R&D Expenditures in Selected Countries
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2478/cer-2013-0021Abstract
This paper analyzes the level of innovation expenditures and R&D fund sources in selected countries of the world in the period of 2000 – 2010. The issues presented indicate significant differences between the discussed countries with respect to the factors analyzed. The European countries at the top were apparently Finland, Denmark and Sweden. High R&D expenditures, with a significant share in business enterprise sector, and a large number of patent applications reflected on the strong economic growth in these countries. The level of R&D investments in these countries was sometimes greater than in the USA or Japan. Dynamic growth in both R&D and patent activity has also been observed in South Korea. Special attention has been paid in this paper to the new European Union members – Central Eastern European Countries. Among this group of countries Slovenia definitely had the highest position, where R&D expenditures were the largest and the structure of R&D funds by source reflected a businessdominance type. Estonia, Czech Republic and Hungary were the countries ‘catching up’ – where growth in R&D expenditures has been observed as well as better dynamics of growth and higher patent activity. Romania, Bulgaria, Lithuania, Poland, Slovakia and Latvia had relatively disadvantageous situations in respect of R&D development and the innovative activity of business enterprises.
Downloads
References
Chesbrough H. (2006) New Puzzles and New Findings. [in] Chesbrough H., Vanhaverbeke W., West J. Open Innovation. Researching a New Paradigm. Oxford, New York
Google Scholar
Eurostat Database 2012a. Total intramural R&D expenditure (GERD) by sectors of performance [rd_e_gerdtot] electronic source, access 29-31.10.2012 r.: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/statistics/search_database
Google Scholar
Eurostat Database 2012b. Patent applications to the EPO by priority year at the national level [pat_ep_ntot] electronic source, access 10.11.2012 r.: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/statistics/search_database
Google Scholar
Eurostat Database 2012c. Enterprises by type of innovation [inn_cis7_type] electronic source, access 18.11.2012 r. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/statistics/search_database
Google Scholar
Eurostat Database 2013. Patents granted by the USPTO by priority year at the national level [pat_us_ntot] electronic source, access 04.01.2013 r.: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/statistics/search_database
Google Scholar
Proposed standard practice for surveys on R&D 2002. Frascati Manual, OECD.
Google Scholar
Grabski M. (2006) Między rządem i nauką – źródła konfliktów. Nauka 4, pp. 21-37
Google Scholar
Nowicka A. (2011) Jednolita ochrona patentowa – uwagi krytyczne. Wynalazczość i ochrona własności intelektualnej. Wybrane zagadnienia ochrony i komercjalizacji dóbr intelektualnych w świetle regulacji prawnych i judykatury. Zeszyt 35
Google Scholar
Piekut M., (2011a.) Działalność B+R czynnikiem rozwoju przedsiębiorstw. Kwartalnik Nauk Przedsiębiorstwie, 3 (20), 87-95
Google Scholar
Piekut M. (2011b) Innovativeness of companies in Poland and other European countries. The Małopolska School of Economics in Tarnów. Works on Management, 2(19), 87-97
Google Scholar
Smith A. (1954), Badania nad naturą i przyczynami bogactwa narodów. PWN, Warszawa
Google Scholar
Ward J. H. (1963), Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58 (301), s. 236-244
Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.