The Chinese Belt and Road Initiative from the Polish Perspective

Dominika Choroś‑Mrozowska

doi:10.2478/cer-2019-0011

Authors

Dominika Choroś‑Mrozowska Cracow University of Economics, Faculty of Finance and Law, Department of Economics, Cracow, Poland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2478/cer-2019-0011

Keywords:

Belt and Road Initiative, “16 1” platform, import, export, trade deficit, FDI

Abstract

China announced its initiative of the so‑called New Silk Road project for the first time in 2013. Although its extent, concept or even its current name (The Belt and Road Initiative, BRI) have changed on a number of occasions since then, it cannot be denied that this is one of the most important challenges currently being undertaken in the world. The countries of Central and Eastern Europe, of which Poland is a part, may have a significant meaning in this concept due to their strategic location. The countries of this region began their co‑operation with China under the so‑called “16 +1” format, and this took place prior to the announcement of the BRI. This opens up new perspectives for Polish‑Chinese trade relations in respect of the BRI initiative and the “16 + 1” platform. The aim of this study is therefore to present the most important effects of the conducted research, the assumption of which was the comprehensive identification of the Chinese BRI initiative and the consequences of its implementation for Polish‑Chinese trade relations. The presented analysis assumes that BRI will have a significant impact on Polish‑Chinese trade patterns. This is particularly important in the context of the huge trade deficit that Poland has been recording for years in its trade with China as well as the deepening asymmetry, which has been characteristic of the exchange.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bachulska, A. (2017), Polska, [in:] Iwanek, K., Pietrewicz, O. (ed.) Chiński projekt „Nowego Jedwabnego Szlaku”. Retoryka a rzeczywistość, Raport Ośrodka Badań Azji, Centrum Badań nad Bezpieczeństwem ASW, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Balding, F. (2017), Can China Afford Its Belt and Road? 17 maj 2017, Bloomberg, https://www.bloomberg.com (accessed: 12.07.2018).
Google Scholar

Belt and Road Opportunities in Central and Eastern Europe (2016), HKTDC, http://economists‑pick‑research.hktdc.com (accessed: 6.08.2018).
Google Scholar

Bondaz, A. (2015), Rebalancing China’s geopolitics, [in:] One Belt One Road: China’s Great Leap Outward, ECFR, www.ecfr.ue (accessed: 6.06.2018).
Google Scholar

Chin, H., He, W. (2016), The Belt and the Road Initiative: 65 Countries and Beyond, Global Sourcing, Fung Business Intelligence Centre, Hong Kong.
Google Scholar

Cohen, D. (2015), China’s “second opening”: Grand ambitions but a long road ahead, [in:] “One Belt One Road”: China’s Great Leap Outward, ECFR, www.ecfr.ue (accessed: 14.08.2018).
Google Scholar

Embassy of the Republic of Poland in Beijing, https://beijing.mfa.gov.pl (accessed: 7.12.2018).
Google Scholar

Garcia‑Herrero, A., Xu, J. (2016), China’s Belt and Road Initiative: Can Europe Expect Trade Gains?, IEMS, Thought Leadership Brief, No. 14.
Google Scholar

Ghiasy, R., Zhou, J. (2017), The Silk Road Economic Belt, Considering security implications and EU‑China cooperation prospects, SIPRI, Stockholm.
Google Scholar

Gieger, G. (2016), One Belt, One Road (OBOR): China’s regional integration initiative, EPRS European Parliamentary Research Service, MRS, PE 586.608.
Google Scholar

Góralczyk, B. (2017), China’s interests in Central and Eastern Europe: enter the dragon, “European View”, Vol. 16, Issue 1.
Google Scholar

HKTDC Research, http://china‑trade‑reseach.hktdc.com (accessed: 6.06.2018).
Google Scholar

Jakimowicz, R. (2017), Nowy Jedwabny Szlak a wzrost pozycji krajów Europy Środkowo‑Wschodniej wobec Rosji i Chin, “Nowa Polityka Wschodnia 2017”, No. 1 (12).
Google Scholar

Jingjing, M. (2018), China investment in CEEC surpasses $9b, Global Times, 2018/6/2, www.globaltimes.cn (accessed: 20.07.2018).
Google Scholar

Kaczmarski, M. (2015), Nowy Jedwabny Szlak: uniwersalne narzędzie chińskiej polityki, Ośrodek Studiów Wschodnich, Komentarze OSW, No. 161.
Google Scholar

Kratz, A. (2015), One Belt, One Road: What’s in it for China’s economic players?, [in:] One Belt One Road: China’s Great Leap Outward, European Council on Foreign Relations, www.ecfr.ue (accessed: 8.08.2018).
Google Scholar

Majman, S. (2015) Silk Road on the Central and Eastern Europe Angle, Internal Document or Silk Road Forum 2015, http://en.drc.gov.cn (accessed: 25.07.2018).
Google Scholar

Narodowy Bank Polski, www.nbp.pl (accessed: 7.11.2018).
Google Scholar

Pantucci, R., Chen, Q. (2015), The geopolitical roadblocks, [in:] “One Belt One Road”: China’s Great Leap Outward, European Council on Foreign Relations, www.ecfr.ue (accessed: 15.08.2018).
Google Scholar

Pavlićević, D. (2016), China in Central and Eastern Europe: 4 Myths, The Diplomat, https://thediplomat.com (accessed: 6.05.2018).
Google Scholar

Pendrakowska, P. (2017), Belt and Road Initiative and “16+1” Challenges for Poland and CEEC, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, www.iim.ftn.uns (accessed: 10.08.2018).
Google Scholar

Research for TRAN Committee: The new Silk Route – opportunities and challenges for EU transport (2018), Policy Department for Structural and Cohesion Policies, IP/B/TRAN/IC/2017–006 January 2018, European Union.
Google Scholar

Rocznik statystyczny handlu zagranicznego 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 [2014, 2015, 2016, 2017], Główny Urząd Statystyczny, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Seaman, J., Huatari, M., Otero‑Iglesias, M. (ed.) (2017), Chinese Investment in Europe; A Country‑Level Approach, A Report by the European Think‑tank Network on China (ETNC), French Institute of International Relations, Elcano Royal Institute, Mercator Institute for China Studies.
Google Scholar

Syntetyczna informacja o eksporcie i imporcie Polski; styczeń – grudzień 2017 rok w mln EUR (dane wstępne), (2018), Ministerstwo Przedsiębiorczości i Technologii, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Szczudlik, J. (2016), Perspektywy formatu Chiny – Europa Środkowo‑Wschodnia (16+1), Polski Instytut Spraw Międzynarodowych, Biuletyn No. 78 (1428).
Google Scholar

Szczudlik‑Tatar, J. (2015), Polsko‑chińskie “strategiczne partnerstwo”: w oczekiwaniu na wymierne rezultaty, PISM, No. 101 (1338).
Google Scholar

Thilo, H., Mikko, H. (2017), Record Flows and Growing Imbalances. Chinese Investment in Europe in 2016, MERICS, Berlin, Papers on China No. 3.
Google Scholar

Van der Leer, Y., Yau, J. (2016), China’s New Silk Route. The Long and Winding Road, “PwC’s Growth Markets Centre”, February.
Google Scholar

Wijeratne, D., Yau, J., Wong, G., Rathbone, M., Ling, N.B., Lau, S. (2017), Repaving the ancient Silk Routes, PwC Growth Market Centre.
Google Scholar

Wong, G., Booker, S., Barthe‑Dejean, G. (2017), China and Belt & Road Infrastructure, 2016 review and outlook, PwC, B&R Watch, Hong Kong.
Google Scholar

Zepp‑LaRouche, H. (2014), The New Silk Road Leads to the Future of Mankind, “Executive Intelligence Review”, Vol. 41, No. 34.
Google Scholar

Zuokui, L. (2017), Europe and the “Belt and Road” Initiative: Responses and Risks, CEEC Think Tank Book Series, Ed. China Social Sciences Press, Beijing.
Google Scholar