The Water‑wastewater‑sludge Sector and the Circular Economy

Danuta Lipińska

doi:10.2478/cer-2018-0030

Authors

Danuta Lipińska Sc.D.Eng., University of Lodz, Faculty of Economics and Sociology, Department of World Economy and European Integration, Lodz, Poland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2478/cer-2018-0030

Keywords:

circular economy, water‑sewage‑sludge industry, reuse of wastewater, recovery of water, energy and phosphorus, sewage sludge

Abstract

The objective of this paper is a theoretical and empirical analysis and evaluation of the role, importance and opportunities of the water‑sewage‑sludge industry in the implementation of the circular economy. To realize this objective, a review of both the literature and the EU strategic documents concerning the subject of the study was conducted. The applied research method is a descriptive analysis based on available statistical data (Eurostat, EEA, EIO and the Polish Central Statistical Office) as well as on source materials. The theoretical part of the work presents the essence of the circular economy and the general characteristics of the analyzed sector, with a particular focus on the potential for the recovery of water from sewage and the reuse of wastewater, as well as the recovery of phosphorus from the wastewater treatment, processing and disposal of sewage sludge. The results of the study show that: (1) there are significant links between the development goals of the water‑sewage‑sludge sector and the circular economy. (2) it is necessary to seek and implement new solutions and technologies leading to the increased recovery of energy and biogens from sewage sludge. (3) there are still many barriers to the recycling of rainwater and graywater as well as to the reuse of wastewater. (4) the circular economy creates new opportunities for water‑sewage and sludge management at the local and national level.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alcalde‑Sanz, L. and Gawlik, B.M. (2014), Water Reuse in Europe. Relevant guidelines, needs for and barriers to innovation. A synoptic overview, Joint Research Centre of the European Commission Publications Office of the European Union. http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC92582 (accessed: 24.01.2018).
Google Scholar

Anderson, J. (2003), The environmental benefits of water recycling and reuse, Water Supply, 3(4).
Google Scholar

Bachorz, M. (2017), Polska droga do gospodarki o obiegu zamkniętym – opis sytuacji i rekomendacje, Report for European Environmental Bureau, www.igoz.org (in Polish).
Google Scholar

Coats, E., Benton, D. (2015), Unemployment and the circular economy in Europe: a study of opportunities in Italy, Poland and Germany, Green Alliance, London, Polish version: by IBS PWnr 4/2016, http://www.green‑alliance.org.uk/resources/Bezrobocie_i_gospodarka_o_obiegu_ zamkni%C4%99tym_w_Europie.pdf (accessed: 16.02.2018), in Polish.
Google Scholar

EC (2014a), Towards a circular economy: A zero waste programme for Europe, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions COM(2014) 398 final. Brussels: European Commission.
Google Scholar

EC (2014b), Progress Report on the Roadmap to a Resource Efficient Europe, Accompanying the document Towards a circular economy: A zero waste programme for Europe, SWD(2014) 206 final/2, Brussels: European Commission.
Google Scholar

EC (2015), Closing the Loop – An EU Action Plan for the Circular Economy, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions COM(2015) 614/2 final, Brussels: European Commission.
Google Scholar

EC (2016), Regulatory barriers for the Circular Economy. Lessons from ten case studies. Final report, www.technopolis‑group.com
Google Scholar

EC (2017a), Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the implementation of the Circular Economy Action Plan COM(2017) 33 final, Brussels: European Commission.
Google Scholar

EC (2017b), The EU Environmental Implementation Review: Common challenges and how to combine efforts to deliver better results, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions COM(2017) 63 final, Brussels: European Commission.
Google Scholar

EC (2017c), Ninth Report on the implementation status and the programmes for implementation (as required by Article 17) of Council Directive 91/271/EEC concerning urban waste water treatment, Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions COM(2017) 749 final, Brussels: European Commission.
Google Scholar

EC (2018), Circular Economy Package 2018, http://ec.europa.eu/environment/circular‑economy/index_en.htm (accessed: 16.03.2018).
Google Scholar

EC (2018), Environment: Eco‑Innovation Action Plan, https://ec.europa.eu/environment/ecoap/indicators/index_en (accessed: 18.06.2018).
Google Scholar

EEA (2016), Circular Economy in Europe – Developing the Knowledge Base, Report, Copenhagen: European Environment Agency, No. 2/2016.
Google Scholar

EIO (2016), Policies and Practices for Eco‑Innovation Up‑take and Circular Economy. Bi‑annual Report 2016. Financed by the European Commission, DG Environment, Brussels: Eco‑Innovation Observatory, https://ec.europa.eu/environment/ecoap/policies‑and‑practices‑eco‑innovation‑uptake‑and‑circular‑economy‑transition_en (accessed: 18.01.2018)
Google Scholar

EMF (2015), Towards the Circular Economy: Economic and Business Rationale for an Accelerated Transition, Ellen MacArthur Foundation, Isle of Wight, p.3, https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/publications/towards‑a‑circular‑economy‑business‑rationale‑for‑an‑accelerated‑transition (accessed: 12.02.2018).
Google Scholar

EurEau (2017), Europe’s water in figures. An overview of the European drinking water and waste water sectors – 2017 edition, https://indd.adobe.com/view/25310e80–338a–4dec‑bb60–1288b6e83f76 (accessed: 10.05.2018).
Google Scholar

Eurostat. Environment: Water statistics, Renewable freshwater resources (env_wat_res), http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/environment/water/database (accessed: 18.01.2018).
Google Scholar

Eslamian S. (ed.) (2016), Urban water reuse handbook, CRS Press Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, London, New York.
Google Scholar

GUS (2017), Environment 2017, CSO, Regional and Environmental Surveys Department; Warsaw. https://stat.gov.pl/obszary‑tematyczne/srodowisko‑energia/srodowisko/ochrona‑srodowiska–2016,1,17.html (accessed: 22.01.2018) (in Polish).
Google Scholar

Karwacka, M. (2017), Gospodarka obiegu zamkniętego. Biznes i konsument na ścieżce zmiany, Publikacja Koalicji na Rzecz Gospodarki Obiegu Zamknietego RECONOMY, Warszawa (in Polish).
Google Scholar

Lazarova, V., Asano, T., Bahri, A., Anderson, J. (2013), Milestones in Water Reuse – The Best Success Stories, IWA Publishing.
Google Scholar

Warężak, T. (2017), Zielone oczyszczalnie przydomowe jako element GOZ, ʽPrzegląd Komunalnyʼ 3/2017. (in Polish).
Google Scholar

Wijkman, A., Skånberg, K., Berglund, M. (2015), The circular economy and benefits for society: jobs and climate clear winners in an economy based on renewable energy and resource efficiency, The Club of Rome, MAVA.
Google Scholar