Government Support and Firm Profitability in Vietnam
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2478/cer-2018-0029Keywords:
government support, profitability, quantile approach, SMEsAbstract
Existing studies on the linkage between government subsidies and firm financial performance often use a mean regression approach and focus mainly on developed countries. To fill the gap, this study, for the first time, considers the impact of government support activities on the profitability of manufacturing SMEs in a developing country, Vietnam. Using an unbalanced panel dataset covering the period 2009–2015, government financial supports show an insignificant linkage with firm profitability when using OLS. However, a fixed‑effect quantile approach reveals that government financial support is negatively related for firms with low profit but is positively related for firms in the high profitability percentile. Our findings also suggest that policymakers should focus on helping start‑ups instead of ineffective, informal firms.
Downloads
References
Bergström, F. (2000), Capital subsidies and the performance of firms, ʽSmall business economics ʼ, 14(3), 183–193.
Google Scholar
Buchinsky, M. (1994), Changes in the US wage structure 1963–1987: Application of quantile regression. Econometrica, ʽJournal of the Econometric Societyʼ, 405–458.
Google Scholar
Cameron, A.C., & Trivedi, P.K. (2009), Microeconometrics using stata (Vol. 5). College Station, TX: Stata Press.
Google Scholar
Canay, I.A. (2011), A simple approach to quantile regression for panel data, ʽThe Econometrics Journalʼ, 14(3), 368–386.
Google Scholar
CIEM. (2010). Characteristics of the Vietnamese business environment: Evidence from an SME survey in 2009. CIEM, Hanoi.
Google Scholar
Coad, A., Segarra, A., & Teruel, M. (2016), Innovation and firm growth: Does firm age play a role?, ʽResearch Policyʼ, 45(2), 387–400.
Google Scholar
Esteve‑Pérez, S., Mánez‑Castillejo, J.A., & Sanchis‑Llopis, J.A. (2008), Does a “survival‑by‑exporting” effect for SMEs exist? ʽEmpiricaʼ, 35(1), 81–104.
Google Scholar
Fryges, H., & Wagner, J. (2010), Exports and profitability: First evidence for German manufacturing firms, ʽThe World Economyʼ, 33(3), 399–423.
Google Scholar
Hansen, H., Rand, J., & Tarp, F. (2009), Enterprise growth and survival in Vietnam: does government support matter?, ʽThe Journal of Development Studiesʼ, 45(7), 1048–1069.
Google Scholar
Joshi, A., Prichard, W. & Heady, C. (2013), Taxing the informal economy: Challenges, possibilities and remaining questions. IDS Working Papers.
Google Scholar
Kizhakethalackal, E.T., Mukherjee, D., & Alvi, E. (2013), Quantile regression analysis of health‑aid and infant mortality: a note, ʽApplied Economics Lettersʼ, 20(13), 1197–1201.
Google Scholar
Loayza, N.V. (1997), The economics of the informal sector: a simple model and some empirical evidence from Latin America. Policy Research Working Paper WPS 1727, The World Bank, Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/685181468743710751/The‑economics‑of‑the‑informal‑sector‑a‑simple‑model‑and‑some‑empirical‑evidence‑from‑Latin‑America
Google Scholar
McKenzie, D., & Sakho, Y.S. (2008), Does it pay firms to register for taxes? The impact of formality on firm profitability, The World Bank.
Google Scholar
Nguyen, T.T., & van Dijk, M.A. (2012), Corruption, growth, and governance: Private vs. state‑owned firms in Vietnam, ʽJournal of Banking & Financeʼ, 36(11), 2935–2948.
Google Scholar
Pergelova, A., & Angulo‑Ruiz, F. (2014), The impact of government financial support on the performance of new firms: the role of competitive advantage as an intermediate outcome, ʽEntrepreneurship & Regional Developmentʼ, 26(9–10), 663–705.
Google Scholar
Rand, J. (2009), Understanding firm‑level corruption in Vietnam: Economics Department, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Google Scholar
Rand, J. & Torm, N. (2012), The benefits of formalization: Evidence from Vietnamese manufacturing SMEs, ʽWorld Developmentʼ, 40(5), 983–998.
Google Scholar
Ranjan, P., & Raychaudhuri, J. (2011), Self‑selection vs. learning: Evidence from Indian exporting firms, ʽIndian Growth and Development Reviewʼ, 4(1), 22–37.
Google Scholar
Tran, T.B., Grafton, R.Q., & Kompas, T. (2008), Firm efficiency in a transitional economy: Evidence from Vietnam, ʽAsian Economic Journalʼ, 22(1), 47–66.
Google Scholar
Tsou, M.‑W., Liu, J.‑T., Hammitt, J.K., & Wang, K.‑H. (2008), Exporting and productivity growth: Evidence from the Taiwan electronics plants, ʽScottish Journal of Political Economyʼ, 55(2), 190–209.
Google Scholar
Vu, H., Holmes, M., Lim, S., & Tran, T. (2014), Exports and profitability: a note from quantile regression approach, ʽApplied Economics Lettersʼ, 21(6), 442–445.
Google Scholar
Vu, V.H., Tran, T.Q., Van Nguyen, T., & Lim, S. (2018), Corruption, types of corruption and firm financial performance: New evidence from a transitional economy, ʽJournal of Business Ethicsʼ, 148(4), 847–858.
Google Scholar
Wooldridge, J.M. (2002), Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Google Scholar
Zhang, H., Li, L., Zhou, D., & Zhou, P. (2014), Political connections, government subsidies and firm financial performance: Evidence from renewable energy manufacturing in China, ʽRenewable Energyʼ, 63(2), 330–336.
Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.