The Impact of COVID–19 on EU‑China Trade Flows

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1508-2008.25.34

Keywords:

COVID–19, international trade, import, export, normalized revealed comparative advantage

Abstract

COVID–19 is expected to have contributed towards changing the geographical structure of world trade, including trade between individual EU countries and China. This article presents the results of an analysis of the impact of the COVID–19 pandemic on Sino‑EU trade flows. The research aims to ascertain whether European Union countries noted a strengthening of their competitive advantage in trade with China in any of the 21 HS sections by increasing the value of the normalized revealed comparative advantage index (NRCA). To identify and select the most significant NRCA observations, Chebyshev’s inequality was used. The analysis was carried out for 2015 to 2020, with a particular emphasis on 2020, when the first effects of the COVID–19 pandemic were recorded. EU‑China trade relations have been the subject of numerous studies, but their nature has not yet been fully elucidated. This article tries to fill that gap. The analysis of mutual trade, especially at such an important moment from the socio‑economic perspective, can bring significant results. The analysis revealed that the pandemic did not result in any decline in EU‑China trade. In fact, global trade rose in 2020, with most of the 27 EU countries recording increases in both imports and exports. There were also no significant changes in the structure of the distribution of comparative advantage. However, in contrast to the previously analyzed years (2015–2019), in 2020, the NRCA index shows a flatter distribution, suggesting that most EU countries with the highest comparative advantages actually observed reductions in them.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

China Outlook (2021), “The Deloitte Research Monthly Outlook and Perspectives”, issue 61, https://www2.deloitte.com/cn/en/pages/about-deloitte/articles/deloitte-research-issue-61.html (accessed: 10.05.2021).
Google Scholar

Ambroziak, Ł., Chojna, J., Gniadek, J., Kępka, H., Strzelecki, J. (2021), Szlaki handlowe po Pandemii Covid–19, PISM, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Balassa, B. (1965), Trade liberalization and revealed comparative advantage, “The Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies”, 33 (2), pp. 99–123, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9957.1965.tb00050.x
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9957.1965.tb00050.x

Balassa B., (1989), Comparative Advantage, Trade Policy and Economic Development, Harvester Wheatsheaf, New York.
Google Scholar

Baroowa, S. (2021), Adopting a China+1 Strategy in ASEAN. Diversifying Supply Chain to Minimize Risks, https://www.dezshira.com/multimedia/view/adopting-china-1-strategy-asean-diversifying-supply-chains-minimize-risks.html (accessed: 15.03.2021).
Google Scholar

China overtakes US as EU’s biggest trading partner (2021), BBC, https://www.bbc.com/news/business-56093378 (accessed: 8.04.2021).
Google Scholar

Dalum, B., Laursen, K., Villumsen, G. (1998), Structural change in OECD export specialization patterns: de-specialization and stickiness, “International Review of Applied Economics”, 12, pp. 423–443, https://doi.org/10.1080/02692179800000017
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02692179800000017

European Commission (2021a), China, https://ec.europa.eu/trade/policy/countries-and-regions/countries/china/ (accessed: 10.04.2021).
Google Scholar

European Commission (2021b), COVID–19: Waiving VAT and customs duties on vital medical equipment, https://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/covid-19-taxud-response/covid-19-waiving-vat-and-customs-duties-vital-medical-equipment_en (accessed: 11.05.2021).
Google Scholar

Eurostat (2021a), Real GDP growth rate – volume, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/tec00115/default/table?lang=en (accessed: 22.05.2021).
Google Scholar

Eurostat (2021b), China-EU – international trade in goods statistics, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=China-EU_-_international_trade_in_goods_statistics (accessed: 5.06.2021).
Google Scholar

Fakhrudin, U., Hastiadi, F.F. (2016), Impact Analysis of Normalized Revealed Comparative Advantageon ASEAN’s Non-Oil and Gas Export Pattern Using Gravity-Model Approach, “Working Paper in Economics and Business”, vol. V, No. 3.
Google Scholar

Fakhrudin, U., Hastiadi, F.F., Haidir, B.M. (2019), Impact Analysis of Normalized Revealed Comparative Advantage on ASEAN’s Non-Oil and Gas Export Pattern Using a Gravity Model Approach, [in:] F. Hastiadi (ed.), Globalization, Productivity and Production Networks in ASEAN, Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, pp. 105–145, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16510-9_5
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16510-9_5

Greenaway, D., Milner, C. (1993) Trade and Industrial Policy in Developing Countries: A Manual of Policy Analysis, The Macmillan Press, London, https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.14118
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.14118

Heckscher, E. (1949), The Effects of Foreign Trade on the Distribution of Income, [in:] H.S. Ellis, L.M. Metzler (eds.), Readings in the Theory of International Trade, Blakiston, Philadelphia, pp. 272–300.
Google Scholar

Hinloopen, J., Marrewijk, C. van (2006), Comparative Advantage, the Rank-size Rule and Zipf’s Law, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper No. 06–1001/1, Amsterdam, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.943370
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.943370

Hoen, A.R., Oosterhaven, J. (2006), On the measurement of comparative advantage, “Annals of Regional Sciences”, 40, pp. 677–691, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-006-0076-4
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-006-0076-4

International Monetary Fund (2021), People’s Republic of China, https://www.imf.org/en/Countries/CHN (accessed: 7.05.2021).
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781513568577.002

Lafay, G. (1990), La Measure des avantages comparatifs reveles, “Economie Prospective Internationale”, 41, pp. 27–42.
Google Scholar

Latruffe, L. (2010), Competitiveness, Productivity and Efficiency in the Agricultural and Agri-Food Sectors, “OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Working Papers”, No. 30, https://doi.org/10.1787/5km91nkdt6d6-en
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/5km91nkdt6d6-en

Laursen, K. (1998), Revealed Comparative Advantage and the Alternatives as Measures of International Specialisation, “DRUID Working Papers”, 98–30, DRUID, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy/Aalborg University, Department of Business Studies.
Google Scholar

Laursen, K. (2015), Revealed comparative advantage and the alternatives as measures of international specialization, “Eurasian Business Review”, 5, pp. 99–115, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40821-015-0017-1
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40821-015-0017-1

Liesner, H.H. (1958), The European Common Market and British Industry, “Economic Journal”, 68 (270), pp. 302–316, https://doi.org/10.2307/2227597
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2227597

Ohlin, B. (1933), Interregional and International Trade, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Google Scholar

Proudman, J., Redding, S. dan, (1998), Openness and Growth, The Bank of England, United Kingdom.
Google Scholar

Ricardo, D. (1817), On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation, John Murray, London.
Google Scholar

Schwesernotes 2016 Level I CFA Book 1: Ethical and Professional Standards and Quantitative Methods (2015), Kaplan, Inc., USA.
Google Scholar

Trade Map (n.d.), https://www.trademap.org/Index.aspxhttps://www.trademap.org/Index.aspxhttps://www.trademap.org (accessed: 25.05.2021)
Google Scholar

Vollrath, T.L. (1991), A theoretical evaluation of alternative trade intensity measures of revealed comparative advantage, “Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv”, 127, pp. 265–280, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02707986
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02707986

Wijnands, J.H.M., Verhoog, D. (2016), Competitiveness of the EU food industry. Ex-post assessment of trade performance embedded in international economic theory, LEI Wageningen UR, Wageningen, https://doi.org/10.18174/369980
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18174/369980

World Customs Organization (n.d.), What is the Harmonized System (HS)?, http://www.wcoomd.org/en/topics/nomenclature/overview/what-is-the-harmonized-system.aspx (accessed: 5.02.2021).
Google Scholar

Yeats, A.J. (1985), On the appropriate interpretation of the revealed comparative advantage index: implications of a methodology based on industry sector analysts, “Weltwirtschaftilches Archiv”, 121, pp. 61–73, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02705840
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02705840

Yu, R., Cai, J., Leung, P.S. (2009), The normalized revealed comparative advantage index, “The Annals of Regional Sciences”, 43 (1), pp. 267–282, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-008-0213-3
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-008-0213-3

Yu, R., Cai, J., Loke, M.K., Leung, P.S. (2009), Assessing the comparative advantage of Hawaii’s agricultural exports to the US mainland market, “Annals of Regional Sciences”, 45 (2), pp. 473–485, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-009-0312-9
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-009-0312-9

Downloads

Published

2022-12-16

How to Cite

Choroś‑Mrozowska, D. (2022). The Impact of COVID–19 on EU‑China Trade Flows. Comparative Economic Research. Central and Eastern Europe, 25(4), 161–178. https://doi.org/10.18778/1508-2008.25.34

Issue

Section

Articles

Funding data