Theoretical Aspects of Collective Decision Making - Survey of the Economic Literature
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2478/cer-2013-0007Abstract
The article aims at surveying the economic literature related to collective decision making. In order to do so it proposes a coherent framework allowing for a structured analysis of the factors influencing the works of a committee. These factors are divided into external ( shaped outside of the committee e.g. by law) and internal ones (related to the composition of the committee and interactions between its members). The survey of the general economic literature related to collective decision making presented within the proposed framework yields interesting suggestions for further research, including the consequences for the shape of monetary policy committees.
Downloads
References
Austen-Smith D., Banks D. (1996), Information aggregation, rationality and the Condorcet Jury Theorem, ‘American Political Science Review’, vol. 90
Banzhaf, J.F. (1965), Weighted Voting Doesn't Work: A Mathematical Analysis, ‘Rutgers Law Review’, vol. 19
Barberà S., Gul F., Stachetti E. (1993), Generalized Median Voter Schemes and Committees, ‘Journal of Economic Theory’, vol. 61, no. 2
Ben-Yashar R.C., Nitzan S.I. (1997), The optimal decision rule for fixed-size committees in dichotomous choice situations: the general result, ‘International Economic Review’, vol. 38, no. 1
Berger H. (2002), The ECB and Euro-Area Enlargement, ‘IMF Working Paper’ no. 02/175
Berk J.M., Bierut B. (2003), Committee structure and its implications for monetary policy decision-making, ‘MEB Series 2003-5’ De Nederlandsche Bank
Berk J.M., Bierut B. (2009), Communication in a monetary policy committee: a note, ‘DNB Working Papers’ No. 226
Black D., (1948), On the Rationale of Group Decision-making, ‘Journal of Political Economy’ vol. 56
Bosman R., Maier P., Sadiraj V., van Winden F. (2005), Let Me Vote! An experimental study of the effects of vote rotation in committees, ‘Andrew Young School of Policy Studies Working Paper’ no. 06-30
Caplin, A., Nalebuff, B. (1988), On the 64%-majority rule, ‘Econometrica’, vol. 56
Casella A., (2001), Market mechanisms for policy decisions: Tools for the European Union, ‘European Economic Review’, vol. 45, no. 4
Casella A., (2005), Storable votes, ‘Games and Economic Behavior’, vol. 51, iss. 2
Casella A., Gelman A., Palfrey T.R. (2006), An experimental study of storable votes, ‘Games and Economic Behavior’, vol. 57, iss. 1
Condorcet M. de (1785), Essai sur l'application de l'analyse à la probabilité des decisions rendues à la pluralité des voix, Paris, L'imprimerie royale
Coughlan P. (2000), In Defense of Unanimous Jury Verdicts: Communication, Mistrials, and Sincerity, ‘American Political Science Review’, vol. 94
Erlenmaier U., Gersbach H. (2001), Flexible Majority Rules, ‘CESifo Working Paper’ no. 464
Feddersen T., Pesendorfer W. (1999), Elections, information aggregation, and strategic voting, ‘Proceedings of the. National Academy of Science USA’, vol. 96
Felsenthal, D. S., Machover M. (1998), The Measurement of Voting Power, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar
Gerling K., Grüner H.P., Kiel A., Schulte E. (2005), Information Acquisition and Decision Making in Committees: a survey, ‘European Journal of Political Economy’, vol. 21, iss. 3
Hahn V. (2012), On the Optimal Size of a Committee of Experts, ‘Department of Economics Working Paper Series’, No. 2012-24, University of Konstanz
Holler M., Owen G. (2001), Power Indices and Coalition Formation, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston/Dordrecht/London
Kirchgässner G. (2008), Direct democracy: obstacle to reform?, ‘Constitutional Political Economy’, Springer, vol. 19(2)
Koriyama Y., Szentes B. (2009), A resurrection of the Condorcet Jury Theorem, “Theoretical Economics” vol. 4
Li H., Rosen S. and Suen W. (2001), Conflicts and Common Interests in Committees, ‘American Economic Review’, vol. 91, no. 5
Macklem T. (2002), Information and Analysis for Monetary Policy: Coming to a Decision, ‘Bank of Canada Review’, Summer 2002
Maggi G., Morelli M. (2006), Self enforcing voting in international organizations, ‘American Economic Review’, vol. 96, no. 4
Maier P., Bezoen S. (2004), Bashing and supporting central banks: the Bundesbank and the European Central Bank, ‘European Journal of Political Economy’, vol. 20
Marchese C., Montefiori M. (2011), Strategy versus sincerity in mean voting, ‘Journal of Economic Psychology’, Vol. 32, Iss. 1
Méon, P.-G. (2006), Majority voting with stochastic preferences: The whims of a committee are smaller than the whims of its members, ‘Constitutional political economy’, vol. 17, n°3
Moulin H. (1988), Axioms of cooperative decision making, Econometric Society Monographs, Cambridge University Press
Ottaviani M., Sørensen P. (2001), Information aggregation in debate: who should speak first?, ‘Journal of Public Economics’, vol. 81
Persico N. (2004), Committee Design with Endogenous Information, ‘Review of Economic Studies’, vol. 71, no. 1
Poole K. T., Daniels R. S. (1985), Ideology, Party and Voting in the US Congress, 1959-1980, ‘American Political Science Review’, vol. 79
Primo D. M. (2002), Rethinking Political Bargaining: Policymaking with a Single Proposer, ‘Journal of Law Economics and Organization’, vol. 18, n° 2
Schulte E. (2010), Information Aggregation and Preference Heterogeneity in Committees, Theory and Decision, vol. 69, iss. 1
Shapley L.S., (1997), A Value on n-Person Games, [in:] H.W. Kuhn (ed.), Classics in Game Theory, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Stanek P. (2004), W stronę rozszerzenia Europejskiego Banku Centralnego (For increasing the ECB), ‘Gospodarka Narodowa’, nr 10
Widgrén, M. (1994), Voting Power in the EC Decision-Making and the Consequences of Two Different Enlargements, ‘European Economic Review’, vol. 38
Widgrén, M. (1999), Flexible integration as an efficient decision-making rule, ‘CEPR Discussion Paper’, no. 220
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
