Sources of left-wing attitudes towards the activism of local groups

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1506-6541.29.03

Keywords:

local activism, left-wing, cultural revolution, neoliberalism, bourgeois bohemia, middle class, values and interests

Abstract

Some leftist intellectuals distance themselves from local activism and accuse it of neglecting political goals and being insensitive to cultural problems. Their critique of activism is based on patterns drawn from modernization discourse and often reveals classism toward the poorer strata of society. The deprecation of local activism is linked to the shift in traditional leftist discourse and its refocusing on cultural problems. Furthermore, it is associated with the political development of the metropolitan middle class. The radicalization of demands in the cultural sphere to politically win over the middle class means that, from the perspective of local communities, leftist discourse loses its credibility as a force capable of systemic change and poverty reduction. In addition, a leftist critique of local activism often repeats the value-laden models that were used during the systemic transformation of the 1990s and served at the time as an ideological justification for exploitation and middle-class supremacy. All this makes the leftist critique of local activism a de facto class critique, conducted in the interests of the middle class.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barbrook R., Imaginary Futures. From Thinking Machines to the Global Village, London 2007.
Google Scholar

Bauman Z., May T., Thinking Sociologically, Oxford 2019.
Google Scholar

Bednarczuk A., “Requiem dla przyszłości, która nie nadejdzie,” [in:] Kultura, media i społeczeństwo w czasie pandemii Covid-19, eds. A. Bednarczuk, K. Walczak, Poznań 2022.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/amup.9788323240211

Brooks D., Bobos in Paradise. The New Upper Class and How They Got There, New York 2001.
Google Scholar

Buchowski M., “Widmo orientalizmu w Europie. Od egzotycznego Innego do napiętnowanego swojego,” Recykling Idei 2008, no. 10.
Google Scholar

Deneed P.J., Why Liberalism Failed, London 2018.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.12987/yale/9780300223446.001.0001

Dunn E.C., Privatizing Poland. Baby Food, Big Business, and the Remaking of Labor, Ithaca–London 2004.
Google Scholar

Eagleton T., After Theory, New York 2004.
Google Scholar

Florida R., The Rise of the Creative Class. And How It’s Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life, Basic Books, New York 2002.
Google Scholar

Foucault M., History of Madness, ed. J. Khalfa, trans. J. Murphy and J. Khalfa, London–New York 2006.
Google Scholar

Harvey D., A Brief History of Neoliberalism, New York 2005.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199283262.003.0010

Harvey D., The Condition of Postmodernity. An Enquiry into the Origins of Social Change, Cambridge–Oxford 1989.
Google Scholar

Heath J., Potter A., The Rebel Sell Why the Culture Can’t Be Jammed, Toronto 2004.
Google Scholar

Horkheimer M., Adorno T., Dialectic of Enlightenment. Philosophical Fragments, ed. G. Schmid Noerr, trans. E. Jephcott, Stanford 2002.
Google Scholar

Leder A., Prześniona rewolucja. Ćwiczenia z logiki historycznej, Warszawa 2014.
Google Scholar

Nowicka-Franczak M., “Ucieczka w postkolonialność. Pułapki wschodnioeuropejskiego dyskursu teorii postkolonialnej,” Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego. Prace Etnograficzne 2017, no. 45(4).
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4467/22999558.PE.17.020.8679

Ost D., “Jak liberałowie utracili poparcie robotników,” [in:] Idea solidarności w kontekstach filozoficzno- historycznych, eds. D. Dobrzański, A. Wawrzynkiewicz, Poznań 2006.
Google Scholar

Ost D., The Defeat of Solidarity. Anger and Politics in Postcommunist Europe, Ithaca–London 2005.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501729270

Pospieszyl M., “Prześniona walka klas. Leder, Marks i mieszczańska rewolucja,” Praktyka Teoretyczna 2013, no. 10(4).
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/prt.2013.4.10

Radukiewicz A., “‘Twardogłowi fanatycy’ i ‘beneficjenci dobrej zmiany’ – o ‘innych’ Komitetu Obrony Demokracji,” Kultura i Społeczeństwo 2018, vol. 62, no. 1.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.35757/KiS.2018.62.1.4

Rose F., Coalitions Across the Class Divide, New York 2000.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501718731

Sadura P., Sierakowski P., Polityczny cynizm Polaków. Raport z badań socjologicznych, Warszawa 2019.
Google Scholar

Sowa J., “Przyszłość odzyskana. Wstęp do wydania polskiego,” [in:] Srnicek N., Williams A., Wymyślając przyszłość. Postkapitalizm i świat bez pracy, Toruń 2019.
Google Scholar

Srnicek N., Williams A., Inventing the Future. Postcapitalism and a World Without Work, New York 2015.
Google Scholar

Starosta P., Poza metropolią. Wiejskie i małomiasteczkowe zbiorowości lokalne a wzory porządku makrospołecznego, Łódź 1995.
Google Scholar

Starosta P., “Społeczność lokalna,” [in:] Encyklopedia Socjologii, vol. 4, joint publication, Warszawa 2002.
Google Scholar

Tittenbrun J., “Klasa średnia – mit czy byt?” Studia Krytyczne / Critical Studies 2016, no. 2/26.
Google Scholar

Tönnies F., Wspólnota i stowarzyszenie. Rozprawa o komunizmie i socjalizmie jako empirycznych formach kultury, Warszawa 2008.
Google Scholar

Turowski J., Socjologia wsi i rolnictwa, Lublin 1992.
Google Scholar

Veblen T., The Theory of the Leisure Class, ed. and intro. by M. Banta, New York 2007.
Google Scholar

Żakowski J., Anty-TINA. Rozmowy o lepszym świecie, myśleniu i życiu, Warszawa 2005.
Google Scholar

Anonymous, “Are you a BOurgeois BOhemian?,” The Guardian, May 27, 2000. Available ­on-line: https://www.theguardian.com/theobserver/2000/may/28/focus.news1
Google Scholar

Bilewicz A., “Przebudźmy się?” Available on-line: https://nowyobywatel.pl/2014/11/14/przebudzmy-sie/
Google Scholar

Flis J.,” Toksyczna opozycja. ‘Żarty z Obajtka, że jest z Pcimia, to przepis na przegrane wybory,’” transcribed by G. Sroczyński, Gazeta.pl., 13.02.2023. Available on-line: https://next.gazeta.pl/next/7,151003,29458120,toksyczna-opozycja-zarty-z-obajtka-ze-jest-z-pcimia-to-przepis.html.
Google Scholar

Korolczuk E., “Populizm, nierówności i uwiąd obywatelstwa socjalnego.” Available on-line: https://tiny.pl/wjvh4
Google Scholar

Lynd R.S., Lynd H.M., “Middletown in Transition: A Study in Cultural Conflicts,” New York 1937. Available on-line: https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.166212/page/n5/mode/2up
Google Scholar

Wic W., Stanowisko Karola Marksa i Fryderyka Engelsa wobec kwestii agrarnej i chłopskiej w Rosji, [scan of the typescript]. Available on-line: https://rep.up.krakow.pl/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11716/6360/RND127–01–Stanowisko-Karola-Marksa–Wic.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Google Scholar

Żuk P., “Klasizm nasz powszedni,” Przegląd 2012, no. 11. Available on-line: https://www.tygodnikprzeglad.pl/piotr-zuk-swobodne-mysli-wroclawia-41/
Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2023-12-05

How to Cite

Bednarczuk, A. (2023). Sources of left-wing attitudes towards the activism of local groups. Zeszyty Wiejskie, 29, 47–64. https://doi.org/10.18778/1506-6541.29.03

Issue

Section

Articles