Daughter–Father Relationships. Biographical Research from a Feminist Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/2450-4491.04.13Keywords:
daughter, father, biographical experience, feminist methodology, reflexivityAbstract
This article aims to contribute to the debate about the reflection on biographical experiences, in particular, the relationship between daughter and father. It presents my research project devoted to young adult women, students, and their perceptions of their relationships with fathers. It also contains an analysis of autobiographical essays of female students (the research participants). The main idea of this research is to appreciate the women’s points of view and to underline the role of reflexivity in the constitution of self-knowledge. Also, I try to discuss my process of becoming a reflective feminist researcher.
References
Alexander I. (1989) A Conversation On Studying And Writing About Women’s Lives Using Nontraditional Methodologies, “Women’s Studies Quarterly”, 17 (3–4): 99–114.
Appelrouth S. Edles L. D. (2008) Classical and Contemporary Sociological Theory: Text and Readings, Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Pine Forge Press.
Collins Hill P. (1990) Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness and the Politics of Empowerment, Boston, Unwin Hyman.
Collins Hill P. (2004) Learning from the Outsider With in: The Sociological Significance of Black Feminist Thought in: The Feminist Standpoint Theory Reader, S. Harding (ed.), New York, Routledge.
Collins Hill P. (2005), Some Group Matters: Intersectionality, Situated Standpoints, and Black Feminist Thought in: A Companion to African-American Philosophy, T. L. Lott, J. P. Pittman (eds.), Blackwell Publishing.
Haraway D. (1988) Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective, “Feminist Studies”, 14 (3): 575–599, http://www.staff.amu.edu.pl/~ewa/Haraway,%20Situated%20Knowledges.pdf
Harding S. (1987) Conclusion. Epistemological Questions in: Feminism and Methodology. Social Science Issues, S. Harding (ed.), Bloomington and Indianapolis, Indiana University Press: 181–189.
Harding S. (1991) Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women’s Lives, New York, Open University Press.
Intermann K. (2010) 25 Years of Feminist Empiricism and Standpoint Theory: Where Are We Now? “Hypatia”, 25 (4): 778–796.
Maynard M. (1995) Feminist Social Research, „Kwartalnik Pedagogiczny” [The Pedagogical Quarterly], 1–2 (155–156): 97–117.
Olesen V. (2005) Early Millennial Feminist Qualitative Research: Challenges and Contours in: The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, N. K. Denzin, Y. S. Lincoln (eds.), (3rd ed.): 235–278, Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications.
Smith D. (1987), The Everyday World as Problematic: A Feminist Sociology, Boston, Northeastern University Press.
Smith D. (1990) The Conceptual Practices of Power: A Feminist Sociology of Knowledge, Toronto, University of Toronto Press.
Smith D. (2005) Institutional Ethnography: A Sociology for People, Toronto, AltaMira Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The journal's website, created and edited by the NOWiS Editorial Team on the Index Copernicus platform: 

