What Is It All About in the Interview? An Attempt to Interpret the Memories About the Jews as Narratives of Identity

Authors

  • Sławomir Kapralski Uniwersytet Pedagogiczny w Krakowie, Instytut Filozofii i Socjologii, ul. Podchorążych 2, 30-084 Kraków

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8069.11.4.01

Keywords:

Interpretation of Interview, Memory, Narrative of Identity, Jews, Antisemitism

Abstract

The article presents a method of interpreting in-depth interviews regarding the ways in which non-Jewish Poles remember Jews. The intention of the suggested method is to find a new perspective that would be complementary to the two most important ones that can be found in the Polish research on this subject: the ethnographic approach and the perspective inspired by psychoanalysis. The main assumption of the presented method is that an interview is not a recollection of the past but a narrative of identity in which the past is (re)constructed according to the imperatives of the present in which the interview is conducted, and the Jews serve to an interviewee only as a frame of reference for his/her constructs of identity. It is further assumed that narratives of identity are constructed along four main dimensions: sacrum, death, sex, and power/violence, each with its own cultural semantics and binary code that is used to separate practices and beliefs that characterize “Us” from those we attribute to “Them.” These codes, together with stories about “Us” and “Them,” make the warp and weft of the narrative identity represented in the interview, which corresponds to Clifford Geertz’s idea of culture as the webs of significance we have spun and in which we are entangled. Then, a single interview has been selected and interpreted to show how the interviewee organizes his stories about Jews in different semantics and codes to keep his narrative of identity consistent.

Author Biography

  • Sławomir Kapralski, Uniwersytet Pedagogiczny w Krakowie, Instytut Filozofii i Socjologii, ul. Podchorążych 2, 30-084 Kraków

    Sławomir Kapralski, dr hab. prof. UP. Jego zainteresowania naukowe to: teoria socjologiczna, antropologia kulturowa, pamięć społeczna, tożsamości zbiorowe, etniczność i nacjonalizm, Holokaust, antysemityzm, społeczności romskie.

References

Bauman Zygmunt (1992) Mortality, Immortality, and Other Life Strategies. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Benz Wolfgang (2004) Anti-Semitism in Europe. Traditions, Structures, Manifestations. Uppsala: Uppsala University.

Burke Peter J. (2013) Identity, Social [w]: Byron Kaldis, ed., Encyclopedia of Philosophy and the Social Sciences, vol. 1. Los Angeles: Sage, s. 453–457.

Cała Alina (1987) Wizerunek Żyda w polskiej kulturze ludowej. Warszawa: Uniwersytet Warszawski.

Cała Alina (1992) Wizerunek Żyda w polskiej kulturze ludowej. Warszawa: Wydawnictwa UW.

Forecki Piotr (2010) Od „Shoah” do „Strachu”. Spory o polsko-żydowską przeszłość i pamięć w debatach publicznych. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Poznańskie.

Geertz Clifford (1973) The Interpretations of Culture. New York: Basic Books.

Grabowski Jan (2011) Judenjagd. Polowanie na Żydów 1942‒1945. Studium dziejów pewnego powiatu. Warszawa: Stowarzyszenie Centrum Badań nad Zagładą Żydów.

Kapralski Sławomir (1999) People of Different Times [w:] tenże, ed., The Jews in Poland, vol. 2. Kraków: Judaica Foundation.

King Anthony (2004) The Structure of Social Theory. London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203646694

Kurowski Marek M. (2004) Paradoks i ironia, czyli krótki kurs socjologii Niklasa Luhmanna. „Rubikon. Kwartalnik Naukowy” nr 1‒4, s. 79–98.

LaCapra Dominick (2001) Writing History, Writing Trauma. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Lynch Michael (1993) Scientific Practice and Ordinary Action. Ethnomethodology and Social Studies of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511625473

Ricoeur Paul (2003) O sobie samym jako innym. Przełożył Bogdan Chełstowski. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.

Roskies Diane K., Roskies David G. (1979) The Shtetl Book. An Introduction to East European Jewish Life and Lore. Jersey City, NJ: KTAV Publishing House.

Schütz Alfred (1962) Common-Sense and Scientific Interpretation of Human Action [w:] tenże, Collected Papers, vol. 1: The Problem of Social Reality. The Hague: Nijhoff, s. 3–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2851-6_1

Skarga Barbara (1997) Tożsamość i różnica. Eseje metafizyczne. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Znak.

Stomma Ludwik (1986) Antropologia kultury wsi polskiej XIX w. Warszawa: Instytut Wydawniczy PAX.

Tokarska-Bakir Joanna (2004) Rzeczy mgliste. Eseje i studia. Sejny: Pogranicze.

Tokarska-Bakir Joanna (2008) Legendy o krwi. Antropologia przesądu. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo W.A.B.

Vaitkus Steven (1991) How Is Society Possible? Dordrecht: K luwer Academic Publishers. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2077-4

Waldenfels Bernhard (2002) Topografia obcego. Przełożył Janusz Sidorek. Warszawa: Oficyna Naukowa.

White Harrison C. (2011) Tożsamość i kontrola. Przełożyła Agnieszka Hałas. Kraków: Nomos.

Yerushalmi Yosef H. (1996) Zakhor: Jewish History and Jewish Memory. Seattle: University of Washington Press.

Downloads

Published

2015-11-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Kapralski, Sławomir. 2015. “What Is It All About in the Interview? An Attempt to Interpret the Memories About the Jews As Narratives of Identity”. Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej 11 (4): 6-33. https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8069.11.4.01.