Rhetorical Styles in Knowledge Communication

Maria Załęska

doi:10.18778/1505-9057.54.04

Authors

Maria Załęska Ph.D. hab., University of Warsaw, Faculty of Modern Languages, Department of Italian Studies https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2973-0173

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1505-9057.54.04

Keywords:

style, rhetoric, metalanguage, academic discourse, scientific popularization

Abstract

The author of the article applied the rhetorical framework of three styles (genera dicendi) to highlight some of the communicative practices employed in academic discourse. By utilising the persuasive resources of the plain style, authors focus on the rhetorical purpose of docere/probare, i.e. to teach/to prove. The sober matter-of-factness of the plain style suggests to readers that there is no style at all, convincing them that the content reflects reality without any rhetorical mediation. In choosing the persuasive means of the middle style, researchers combine epistemic and aesthetic goals, trying to reach the rhetoric purpose of delectare, i.e. to delight. An engaging style helps them draw readers into intellectually complex issues. The grand style facilitates the reaching of the rhetorical purpose of movere, i.e. to move or induce action. It serves to present science as a helpful resource for readers to make decisions in their lives, hence it is likely to be used by engaged scholars and public intellectuals.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Maria Załęska, Ph.D. hab., University of Warsaw, Faculty of Modern Languages, Department of Italian Studies

Maria Załęska – Ph.D. hab.; she focuses on linguistics (studies on rhetoric, theory of argumentation, pragmatics and discourse analysis, in particular in reference to specialist texts) and the methodology of teaching Italian. She is the author many publications on academic discourse intended to both promote and teach science, e.g. Retorica della linguistica. Scienza, struttura, scrittura (2014), Il discorso accademico italiano. Temi, domande e prospettive (2016, red.), Rhetoric, Discourse and Knowledge (2016, co-editor).

References

Ad C. Herennium: de ratione dicendi (Rhetorica ad Herennium) [Cicero], trans. into English by H. Caplan, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA / William Heinemann, London 1989.
Google Scholar

Altieri Biagi, Fra lingua scientifica e lingua letteraria, Istituti Editoriali e Poligrafici Internazionali, Pisa–Roma–Venezia–Vienna 1998.
Google Scholar

Aristotle, Retoryka. Retoryka dla Aleksandra. Poetyka, trans. H. Podbielski, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa 2004.
Google Scholar

Berardinelli A., La forma del saggio. Definizione e attualità di un genere letterario, Marsilio, Venice 2002.
Google Scholar

Bogołębska B., “Proces wyodrębniania się teorii stylu na przełomie wieku XIX na XX”, Stylistyka 1993, issue 2, pp. 163–171.
Google Scholar

Bogołębska B., “Romantyczny model retoryki i nauki o stylu. Przegląd problematyki”, Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Litteraria Polonica 1998, issue 1, pp. 139–152.
Google Scholar

Bogołębska B., Studia o stylistyce i retoryce, Studio Graf, Zgierz 2001.
Google Scholar

Bogołębska B., Tradycje retoryczne w stylistyce polskiej. Narodziny dyscypliny, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź 1996.
Google Scholar

Carter M., “Scholarship as rhetoric of display; or, why is everybody saying all those terrible things about us?”, College English 1992, no. 54, pp. 303–313.
Google Scholar

Davidson D., Inquiries into truth and interpretation, Clarendon Press, Oxford 1984.
Google Scholar

Gajda S., Podstawy badań stylistycznych nad językiem naukowym, PWN, Warszawa 1982.
Google Scholar

Gajda S., “Styl naukowy”, [in:] Współczesny język polski, J. Bartmiński (ed.), Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej, Lublin, 2001.
Google Scholar

Gusfield J., “The literary rhetoric of science: Comedy and pathos in drinking driver research“, American Sociological Review 1976, no. 41, pp. 16–34.
Google Scholar

Korolko M., Sztuka retoryki. Przewodnik encyklopedyczny, Wiedza Powszechna, Warszawa 1990.
Google Scholar

Le Bovier de Fontenelle B., Éléments de la géométrie de l’infini. Suite des memoires de l’Academie Royale des sciences, L’Imprimerie royale, Paris 1727, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fontenelle__%C3%89lements_de_la_geometrie_de_l%27infini,_1727_-_1520530.jpg [accessed on: 1.09.2018].
Google Scholar

Marcus Tullius Cicero, O mówcy, trans. B. Awianowicz, Wydawnictwo Marek Derewiecki, Kęty 2010.
Google Scholar

Montaigne M., Essais, Garnier, Paris 1958.
Google Scholar

Partyka J., Między scientia curiosa a encyklopedią: europejskie konteksty dla staropolskich kompendiów wiedzy [in print].
Google Scholar

Peck MacDonald S., Professional Academic Writing in the Humanities and Social Sciences, Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale and Edwardsville 1994.
Google Scholar

Pera M., The Discourses of Science, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago–London 1994.
Google Scholar

Perelman Ch., Olbrechts-Tyteca L., Trattato dell’argomentazione. La nuova retorica, trans. C. Schick, M. Mayer, E. Barassi, Einaudi, Torino 2001.
Google Scholar

Pinker S., Piękny styl. Przewodnik człowieka myślącego po sztuce pisania XXI wieku, trans. A. Nowak-Młynikowska, Smak Słowa, Sopot 2015.
Google Scholar

Posner R.A., Public Intellectuals, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA 2001.
Google Scholar

“retorica” [entry], [in:] http://www.treccani.it/enciclopedia/retorica/; [accessed on: 15.09.2018].
Google Scholar

Schumway D.R., “Comment on ‘Beyond Literary Darwinism’”, College English 1991, no. 53, pp. 831–834.
Google Scholar

Sendyka R., Nowoczesny esej. Studium historycznej świadomości gatunku, Universitas, Kraków 2004.
Google Scholar

Sierotowicz T., “Galileuszowe ćwiczenia z retoryki. Bajka o koniku polnym z ‘Wagi probierczej’ jako argument ‘ab exempla’”, [in:] Retoryka – krytyka – wiedza, M. Załęska (ed.), PTR, Warszawa 2016, pp. 83–111.
Google Scholar

Thomas F.-N., Turner M., Clear and simple as truth. Writing classic prose, Princeton University Press, Princeton 1994.
Google Scholar

Worsowicz M., O “duchu stosowności”. Teoria retoryczna a współczesna praktyka medialna, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź 2013.
Google Scholar

Załęska M., “Parodie dyskursu akademickiego”, [in:] Humor. Teorie, praktyka, zastosowania/Humour. Theories, Applications, Practices, vol. 1: Zrozumieć humor, S. Dżereń-Głowacka, A. Kwiatkowska (eds.), Naukowe Wydawnictwo Piotrkowskie, Piotrków Trybunalski 2009, pp. 109–120.
Google Scholar

Załęska M., Retorica della linguistica. Scienza, struttura, scrittura, Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main etc. 2014.
Google Scholar

Załęska M., “Retoryczne aspekty popularyzacji naukowej”, Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Litteraria Polonica 2016, issue 1(31), pp. 59–70.
Google Scholar