Redness as Perceived through the Eyes of the Romans

Autor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-0319.24.05

Słowa kluczowe:

antyczny Rzym, kolory, czerwień, terminologia

Abstrakt

The article is an attempt to revise the long-established belief in the alabaster-white exterior shape of Roman antiquity, which in fact turns out to be full of colours that bring life to its image. The authors implement this intention by indicating how intensely the colour red was present in the reality described by classical Latin authors – contrary to the accusation that one of the participants of the discussion on this subject in Aulus Gellius’ Attic Nights (Gell. Noc. Att. 2.26) makes of the alleged poverty regarding various shades of red in Latin terminology. The material presented contradicts the opinion expressed in Gellius’ text, and at the same time makes us realise how colourful and lively the world that emerges from the literary works of the classical Roman period was. In comparison with it, the reality witnessed by the literature of the Christian era – this parallel is what the authors of the article focus on, concluding their deliberations – in which red becomes almost exclusively a sign of shame, turns out to be ascetically sterile and depressingly colourless.

Biogramy autorów

Marta Czapińska-Bambara - Uniwersytet Łódzki

dr Marta Czapińska-Bambara (Uniwersytet Łódzki) – Assistant Professor of Classics at the University of Lodz at the Department of Latin Studies and Linguistics. She received her mastersʼ degrees in Cultural Anthropology and Classics and defended her PhD thesis in Classical Philology. Her research focuses mainly on the Latin literature and the reception of selected political, rhetorical and philosophical concepts of ancient authors in Renaissance thought. She is the author of a monograph Èthos przywódcy politycznego w myśli starożytnej i renesansowej. Platon, Cyceron, Machiavelli, Guicciardini.

Zbigniew Danek - Uniwersytet Łódzki

dr hab. Zbigniew Danek prof. UŁ (Uniwersytet Łódzki) – Professor of Classics and, since 2003, the head of the Department of Latin Studies and Linguistics at the University of Lodz. He defended his PhD thesis on the Platonic dialogue Cratylus in 1987 and obtained his post-Doctoral degree in 2000 on the basis of a dissertation on the gnoseological problems of the Platonic dialogue Thaeetetus. His current research focuses mainly on the problems of epicurean anthropology, as well as on Platonic concepts concerning the gnoseological status of linguistic structures and the rational and metaphysical cognition of reality.

Bibliografia

Apuleio. (1988). Metamorfosi (L’asino d’oro). A cura di M. Cavalli. Milano: Mondadori.
Google Scholar

Arnobius. (1953). Adversus nationes libri VII. Ed. C. Marchesi. Aug. Taurinorum: Io. Bapt. Paraviae et Sociorum.
Google Scholar

Augustinus Hipponensis, A. (1981). De civitate Dei libri XXII. Ed. B. Dombart et A. Kalb. Stutgardiae: B. G. Teubneri.
Google Scholar

Carus Lucretius Titus. (1982). De rerum natura libri sex. Ed. J. Martin. Leipzig: Teubner.
Google Scholar

Catulle. (2015). Poésies. Éd. et trad. par G. Lafaye. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
Google Scholar

Celsus, A.C. (1831). On Medicine. Vol. I‒II. Ed. A. Lee. London: Cox.
Google Scholar

Cicero, M.T. (1922). Orationes. Clark, A.C. Oxford: Oxford University Press; Oxford Classical Texts.
Google Scholar

Cicero, M.T. (1933). Cicero. De Natura Deorum. Plasberg, O. Leipzig: Teubner.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/DLCL.marcus_tullius_cicero-de_natura_deorum.1933

Cicero, M.T. (1961). Ciceronis Epistulae. Vol. II. Rec. D.R. Shackleton Bailey. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Oxford Classical Texts.
Google Scholar

Cicero, M.T. (1978). Lucullus. In: A. Russo (ed.) Scettici antichi. Torino: UTET.
Google Scholar

Cicero, M.T. (1987). Scripta quae manserunt omnia. De Divinatione, De Fato, Timaeus. Plasberg, O., Ax, W. Leipzig: Teubner https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110952544
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110952544.154

Cicéron, M.T. (2002). Correspondance. T. VII. Éd. et trad. par J. Beaujeu. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
Google Scholar

Columella, L.I.M. (1794). De re rustica lib. XII Et Librum De Arboribus. Ed. J.G. Schneider. Lipsiae: Fritsch.
Google Scholar

Columelle. (2002). De l’agriculture. L. X. Éd. et trad. par E. de Saint-Denis. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
Google Scholar

Columelle. (2002). De l’agriculture. L. XII. Éd. et trad. par J. André. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
Google Scholar

Diomedes. (1857–1870). Ars Grammatica. In: H. Keil (ed.) Grammatici Latini. Lipsiae: Teubner.
Google Scholar

Flaccus, Q.H. (1970). Q. Horatii Flacci Opera. Ed. F. Klinger. Leipzig: Teubner.
Google Scholar

Flaccus, V. (1970). Valeri Flacci Argonauticon. Rec. E. Courtney. Leipzig: Teubner.
Google Scholar

Gellio Aulo. (2017). Le notti attiche. T. I–II. A cura di G. Bernardi-Perini. Torino: UTET.
Google Scholar

Hygin. (2012). Fables. Éd. et trad. par J.-Y. Boriaud. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
Google Scholar

Iuvenalis, D.I., Persius, A.F. (2004). Juvenal and Persius. Ed. S.M. Braund. London: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar

Largus Scribonius. (1529). De compositione medicamentorum liber. Ed. J. Winter, J. Ruel. Basilea: Cratandrus.
Google Scholar

Lucain. (1836). La guerre civile (La Pharsale). T. II (l. VI–X). Éd par C.L.F. Panckoucke. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
Google Scholar

Martial. (1993). Epigrams. Vol. I. Transl. R. Shackleton, D. Bailey. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Loeb Classical Library.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/DLCL.martial-epigrams.1993

Martial. (1993). Epigrammes II. Éd et trad. par H. J. Izaac. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
Google Scholar

Ovide. (1960). L’Art d’aimer. Trad. par H. Bornecque. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
Google Scholar

Ovide. (1961). Les Remèdes à l’amour, Les produits de beauté pour le visage de la femme. Trad. Par H. Bornecque. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
Google Scholar

Ovide. (1968). Tristes. Trad. par J. André. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
Google Scholar

Ovide. (1992‒1993). Les Fastes. T. 1‒2. Trad. et com. par R. Schilling. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
Google Scholar

Ovidius, P.N. (1985). Metamorphoses. Ed. W. S. Anderson. Leipzig: Teubner.
Google Scholar

Pétrone. (2001). Satiricon. Éd et trad. par O. Sers. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
Google Scholar

Plaute. (1932). Comédies. T. I. Éd et trad. par A. Ernout. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
Google Scholar

Plaute. (2002). Comédies. T. II, VI. Éd et trad. par A. Ernout. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
Google Scholar

Plinio il Vecchio (Gaio Plinio Secondo). (1982–1988). Storia Naturale. Vol. 1–5. A cura di G.B. Conte. Torino: Einaudi.
Google Scholar

Properce. (1961). Les Élégies. Trad. par D. Paganelli. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
Google Scholar

Pseudo-César. (1997). Guerre d’Afrique. Éd. et trad. par A. Bouvet. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
Google Scholar

Sénèque. (1912). Questions naturelles. T. II (l. IV–VII). Trad. par P. Oltramare. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
Google Scholar

Sénèque. (2013). Tragédies. T. II. Éd. et trad. par F.-R. Chaumartin. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
Google Scholar

Stace. (2003). Silves. T. I–II. Éd. par F. Frère. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
Google Scholar

Stace. (2003). Thébaïde. T. I–III. Éd. et trad. par R. Lesueur. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
Google Scholar

Suétone. (1931). Vie des douze Césars. T. II. Éd. et trad. par H. Ailloud. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
Google Scholar

Suétone. (2011). Vie des douze Césars. T. III. Éd. et trad. par H. Ailloud. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
Google Scholar

Tacite. (2002). Histoires. T. II: l. II–III. Éd. et trad. par J. Hellegouarc’h. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
Google Scholar

Tacite. (2013). Annales. T. I: l. I–III. Éd et trad. par P. Wuilleumier. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
Google Scholar

Térence. (2002). Comédies. T. II–III. Éd. et trad. par J. Marouzeau. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
Google Scholar

Tertullien. (1942). Quinti Septimi Tertuliani opera. Ed. E. Kroymann. Lipsiae: AkademischeVerlagsgesellschaft.
Google Scholar

Tibulle. (2002). Élégies. Éd. et trad. par M. Ponchont. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
Google Scholar

Tite-Live. (2002). Histoire romaine. T. XXI: l. XXXI. Éd et trad. par A. Hus. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
Google Scholar

Tite-Live. (2002). Histoire romaine. T. XXVI: l. XXXVI. Éd et trad. par A. Manuélian. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
Google Scholar

Tite-Live. (2003). Histoire romaine. T. II: l. II. Éd par J. Bayet. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
Google Scholar

Tite-Live. (2012). Histoire romaine. T. I: l. I. Éd par J. Bayet. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
Google Scholar

Varro. (1938). On the Latin Language. Vol. I: b. 5–7. Transl. by R.G. Kent. Cambridge: MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/DLCL.varro-latin_language.1938

Varro, M.T. (1985). Saturarum menippearum fragmenta. Ed. R. Astbury. Leipzig: Teubner.
Google Scholar

Varron. (1997–2002). Économie rurale. L. II–III. Trad. par Ch. Guiraud. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
Google Scholar

Varron. (2002). Économie rurale. L. I. Trad. par J. Heurgon. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
Google Scholar

Virgile. (2009). Géorgiques. Trad. par E. de Saint-Denis. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
Google Scholar

Virgile. (2014). Bucoliques. Éd. par E. de Saint-Denis. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
Google Scholar

Virgile. (2015). L’Énéide/Aeneis. Trad. par O. Sers. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
Google Scholar

Vitruve. (2015). De l’architecture. Éd. par P. Gros. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
Google Scholar

André, J. (1949). Étude sur les Termes de Couleur dans la langue Latine. Paris: Librairie C. Klincksieck.
Google Scholar

Bond, S.E. (2017). “Why We Need to Start Seeing the Classical World in Color”. Hyperallergic, [online] https://hyperallergic.com/383776/why-we-need-to-start-seeing-the-classical-worldin-color/ (date of access 26 July 2020).
Google Scholar

Bradley, M. (2009). Colour and Meaning in Ancient Rome. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Brinkmann, V. et al. (eds.) (2017). Gods in Color: Polychromy in the Ancient World. New York: Prestel.
Google Scholar

Clarke, J.R. (1998). Imagery of Colour and Shining in Catullus, Propertius and Horace. Adelaide: University of Adelaide.
Google Scholar

Dupont, F. (2006). La vita quotidiana nella Roma repubblicana. Roma–Bari: Laterza.
Google Scholar

Edgeworth, R.J. (1979). “Does ‘purpureus’ mean ‘bright’?”. Glotta 57. 281–291.
Google Scholar

Elliott, Ch. (2008). “Purple Pasts: Color Codification in the Ancient World”. Law & Social Inquiry 33/1. 173–194 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2008.00097.x
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2008.00097.x

Étienne, R. et F. (1990). La Grèce antique: archèologie d’une dècouverte. Paris: Gallimard.
Google Scholar

Gage, J. (1993). Color and Culture: Practice and Meaning from Antiquity to Abstraction. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Google Scholar

Götter, B. (2003). Die Farbigkeit antiker Skulptur. Munich: Glyptothek.
Google Scholar

Gryksa, E. (2018). Color armorum w literaturze rzymskiej. In: A. Kucz, P. Matusiak (eds.). Lingua coloris (T. 4. Szkice o antyku). Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego. 39–48.
Google Scholar

Hunt, A. (1996). Governance of the Consuming Passions: A History of Sumptuary Law. New York: St. Martin’s Press https://doi.org/10.1057/9780333984390
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780333984390

Liverani, P., Santamaria, U. (eds.) (2014). Diversamente bianco. La policromia della scultura romana. Roma: Quasar.
Google Scholar

Moulinier-Brogi, L. (2012). Uroscopie au Moyen-Age. Lire dans un verre la nature de l’homme. Paris: Champion.
Google Scholar

Ogórka-Tabiś, A. (2018). Czy wino może być zielone? ‒ zmiany parametrów barwy wina czerwonego pod wpływem wybranych czynników chemicznych i biologicznych. In: A. Kucz, P. Matusiak (eds.). Lingua coloris (T. 4. Szkice o antyku). Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego. 143–156.
Google Scholar

Pastoureau, M. (2006). Średniowieczna gra symboli. Warszawa: Oficyna Naukowa.
Google Scholar

Pelletier-Michaud L. (2016). Évolution du sens des termes de couleur et de leur traitement poétique. L’élégie romaine et ses modèles grecs. Québec: Université Laval.
Google Scholar

Phipps, E. (2010). Cochineal Red: The Art History of a Color. New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New Haven–London: Yale University Press.
Google Scholar

Piechocka-Kłos, M. (2016). „Rozważania o różnorodności kolorów i ich łacińskich oraz greckich nazwach w Nocach Attyckich (2.26) Aulusa Gelliusza”. Studia Warmińskie 53. 319–329 https://doi.org/10.31648/sw.106
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.31648/sw.106

Reinhold, M. (1970). History of Purple as a Status Symbol in Antiquity. Brussels: Latomus.
Google Scholar

Rzepińska, M. (1983). Historia koloru w dziejach malarstwa europejskiego. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Literackie.
Google Scholar

Segura Ramos, B. (2006). “El color de Vergilio”. Cuadernos de Filología Clásica. Estudios Latinos 26/2. 37–69.
Google Scholar

Skwara, E. (2001). Historia komedii rzymskiej. Warszawa: Prószyński i S-ka.
Google Scholar

Thomas, Ph.L. (1979). “Red and White: A Roman Color Symbol”. Rheinisches Museum für Philologie, 122. 310–316.
Google Scholar

Opublikowane

2021-12-28

Jak cytować

Czapińska-Bambara, M., & Danek, Z. (2021). Redness as Perceived through the Eyes of the Romans. Collectanea Philologica, (24), 87–100. https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-0319.24.05