Rozumne zachowania zwierząt w relacji Marka Tulliusza Cycerona

Autor

  • Zbigniew Danek Uniwersytet Łódzki, Katedra Filologii Klasycznej, Zakład Latynistyki i Językoznawstwa, ul. Pomorska 171/173, 90–236 Łódź

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-0319.20.04

Słowa kluczowe:

Cicero, rationality, Stoics, animals, reasonableness

Abstrakt

-

Biogram autora

Zbigniew Danek - Uniwersytet Łódzki, Katedra Filologii Klasycznej, Zakład Latynistyki i Językoznawstwa, ul. Pomorska 171/173, 90–236 Łódź

He is an Associate Professor in Classical Philology at the University of Łódź since 1981. Received a doctorate with a dissertation on Platonic dialogue Cratylus. In 2000 appointed professor at the University of Łódź with a book Myślę, więc nie wiem – Próba interpretacji platońskiego dialogu „Teajtet. Scientific interests: Epicurean anthropology, Platonic epistemology, philosophy of language, Cicero’s ethic.

Bibliografia

Andrews, K. (2015). The Animal Mind. An Introduction to the Philosophy of Animal Cognition. London–New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar

Argyle, M. (1991). Cooperation: The Basis of Sociability. London: Routledge.
Google Scholar

Cicero, M. T. (1915). Scripta quae manserunt omnia, fasc. 43. De finibus bonorum et malorum. Th. Schichte (ed.). Leipzig: Teubner.
Google Scholar

Cicero, M. T. (1918). De legibus libri tres. C. F. W. Müller (ed.). Leipzig: Teubner.
Google Scholar

Cicero, M. T. (1918). Tusculanae disputationes. M. Pohlenz (ed.), Leipzig: Teubner.
Google Scholar

Cicero, M. T. (1928). De officiis, with an English Translation. W. Miller (ed.). London: William Heinemann LTD.
Google Scholar

Cicero, M. T. (1980). De natura deorum. W. Ax (ed.). Stuttgart: Teubner.
Google Scholar

Cicero, M. T. (2004). Epistulae ad Quintum fratrem et M. Brutum. D. R. Shackleton Bailey (ed.). Cambridge–New York: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Cyceron, M. T. (1960). Pisma filozoficzne. T. 1. Przeł. W. Kornatowski. Warszawa: PWN.
Google Scholar

Lucretius, T. C. (1953). De rerum natura libri sex. J. Martin (ed.). Leipzig: Teubner.
Google Scholar

Newmyer, S. T. (2017). The Animal and the Human in Ancient and Modern Thought. The Man “Alone of Animals” Concept. London: Routledge.
Google Scholar

Philo Alex. (1822). De animalibus adversus Alexandrum. J. B. Aucher (ed.). Venetiis.
Google Scholar

Reinhardt, L. (1888). Die Quellen von Ciceros Schrift de deorum natura. Diss. Breslau.
Google Scholar

Rocca, S. (2003). Animali (e uomini) in Cicerone (De Nat. Deor. 2, 121–161). Genoa: Compagnia dei Librai.
Google Scholar

Sorabji, R. (1993). Animal Minds and Human Morals, Ithaca–New York: Cornell University Press.
Google Scholar

Tutrone, F. (2016). Vox naturae: The Myth of Animal Nature in the Late Roman Republic. W: P. Johnston et al. (eds.), Animals in Greek and Roman Religion and Myth. Cambridge Scholars Publishing. 51–84.
Google Scholar

Weil, K. (2012). Thinking Animals: Why Animal Studies Now? New York: Columbia University Press.
Google Scholar

Wright, M. R. (2002). Cicero on Self-Love and Love of Humanity in De Finibus 3. W: J. G. F. Powell (ed.), Cicero the Philosopher. Twelve Papers. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 171–197.
Google Scholar

Pobrania

Opublikowane

2017-12-30

Jak cytować

Danek, Z. (2017). Rozumne zachowania zwierząt w relacji Marka Tulliusza Cycerona. Collectanea Philologica, (20), 53–62. https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-0319.20.04

Numer

Dział

Articles