The International Labour Organisation’s Recommendation No. 198 and Self-Employed Workers

Zbigniew Hajn

doi:10.18778/0208-6069.107.03

Authors

Zbigniew Hajn University of Lodz https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7755-6187

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6069.107.03

Keywords:

self-employed worker, genuinely self-employed dependent worker, genuinely and independently self-employed worker, employment relationship

Abstract

The article discusses the legal situation of self-employed workers in international labour law. In particular, it focuses on the International Labour Organisation’s (hereafter: the ILO) predominant and clearly articulated approach in its Employment Relationship Recommendation, 2006 (No. 198), of dichotomising workers into employees and genuinely self-employed, and making the scope of their protection dependent on their belonging to one of these categories. The author questions whether this is the most appropriate way to provide protection to workers working under various forms of contractual arrangements other than the employment contract, including persons to be defined as “genuinely self-employed dependent workers.” A separate strand of consideration is the legal situation of genuinely and independently self-employed workers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bignami, Renato. Giuseppe Casale. Mario Fasani. 2013. Labour inspection and the employment relationship. Working Document Number 28. Geneva: Internation Labour Organization.
Google Scholar

Collins, Hugh. 1990. “Independent Contractors and the Challenge of Vertical Disintegration to Employment Protection Laws.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 10: 353–384. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/10.3.353
Google Scholar

Commission. 2021/1. Second-Phase Consultation of Social Partners Under Article 154 TFEU on Possible Action Addressing the Challenges Related to Working Conditions in Platform Work (Consultation Document) C(2021) 4230 final.
Google Scholar

Commission. 2021/2. Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on improving working conditions in platform work, COM(2021) 762 final.
Google Scholar

Commission. 2021/3. Guidelines on the application of EU competition law to collective agreements regarding the working conditions of solo self-employed persons, C(2021) 8838 final.
Google Scholar

Conclusions of the Meeting of Experts on Non-Standard Forms of Employment, 323rd Session, 12–27 March 2015, Geneva. 50–53. http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_norm/---relconf/documents/meetingdocument/wcms_354090.pdf (accessed: 15.01.2022).
Google Scholar

Countouris, Nicola. Valerio De Stefano. 2019. New trade union strategies for new forms of employment. Brussels: ETUC. https://doi.org/10.1177/2031952519872323
Google Scholar

Creighton, Breen. Shae McCrystal. 2016. “Who is a ‘Worker’ in International Law?” Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal 37(3): 691–725.
Google Scholar

De Stefano, Valerio. 2021. “Not as simple as it seems: The ILO and the personal scope of International Labour Standards.” International Labour Review 160(3): 387–406. https://doi.org/10.1111/ilr.12201
Google Scholar

Duraj, Tomasz. 2023. „Prawny model ochrony pracy na własny rachunek – wprowadzenie do dyskusji.” Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Iuridica 101: 21–34. https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6069.101.01
Google Scholar

European Commission. 2021. Second-Phase Consultation of Social Partners Under Article 154 TFEU on Possible Action Addressing the Challenges Related to Working Conditions in Platform Work (Consultation Document), Commission C(2021) 4230 final.
Google Scholar

European Parliament. 2007. Resolution of 11th July 2007 on modernising labour law to meet the challenges of the 21st century (2007/2023(INI).
Google Scholar

Governing, Body. 2000. Report of the Meeting of Experts on Workers in Situations Needing Protection. Geneva: International Labour Office.
Google Scholar

Governing, Body. 2015. Conclusions of the Meeting of Experts on Non-Standard Forms of Employment. Geneva: International Labour Office.
Google Scholar

ILC. 1949. (91st Session), General Survey of the Reports Concerning the Protection of Wages Convention, 1949 (No. 95) and the Protection of Wages Recommendation (No. 85), Report III (Part 1B). Geneva: International Labour Office.
Google Scholar

ILC. 1990. (77th Session), Record of Proceedings, Conclusions concerning the promotion of self-employment. Geneva: International Labour Office.
Google Scholar

ILC. 1997. (85th Session), Record of Proceedings, Committee reports. Geneva: International Labour Office. https://www.ilo.org/public/libdoc/ilo/P/09616/09616%281990-77%29.pdf (accessed: 18.10.2023).
Google Scholar

ILC. 1999. (87th Session), Report of the Director-General, Decent Work. Geneva: International Labour Office.
Google Scholar

ILC. 2003. (91st Session), The scope of the employment relationship. Report V. Geneva: International Labour Office.
Google Scholar

ILC. 2006. (95th Session), The employment relationship. Report V(1). Geneva: International Labour Office.
Google Scholar

ILC. 2020. (109th Session), Promoting employment and decent work in a changing landscape. Report of the Committee of Experts on the Application of Conventions and Recommendations (articles 19, 22 and 35 of the Constitution). Report III (Part B). Geneva: International Labour Office.
Google Scholar

ILO. 2016. Non-standard employment around the world: Understanding challenges, shaping prospects. Geneva: International Labour Office.
Google Scholar

ILO. 2018. Freedom of Association. Compilation of decisions of the Committee on Freedom of Association. Geneva: International Labour Office.
Google Scholar

ILO. 2019. Global Commission on the Future of Work, Work for a Brighter Future. Geneva: International Labour Office.
Google Scholar

ILO. 2021. World Employment and Social Outlook 2021: The role of digital labour platforms in transforming the world of work. Geneva: International Labour Office.
Google Scholar

Kösters, Lian. Wendy Smits. 2022. “‘Genuine’ or ‘Quasi’ Self-Employment: Who Can Tell?” Social Indicators Research 161: 191–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-021-02794-5
Google Scholar

Musiała, Anna. 2014. “Prawna problematyka świadczenia pracy przez samozatrudnionego ekonomicznie zależnego.” Monitor Prawa Pracy 2: 69–73.
Google Scholar

O’Brien, Charlotte. Eleonor Spaventa. Joyce De Coninck. 2016 Comparative Report 2015. The concept of worker under Article 45 TFEU and certain non-standard forms of employment. Brussels: European Commission. https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/99808/1/ComparativeReport2015_ConceptOfWorker_20160426FINAL_2_.pdf (accessed: 14.11.2023).
Google Scholar

Office of the Legal Adviser. 2006. Manual for drafting ILO instruments. Geneva: International Labour Office.
Google Scholar

Perulli, Adalberto. 2003. Economically dependent/quasi-subordinate (parasubordinate) employment: legal, social and economic aspects. Brussels.
Google Scholar

Report of the Meeting of Experts on Workers in Situations Needing Protection. 2000. Geneva 15–19 May 2000.
Google Scholar

Servais, Jean-Michel. 2017. International Labour Law. Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer.
Google Scholar

Skupień, Dagmara. 2022. “Praca na własny rachunek w ramach Unii Europejskiej w świetle prawa i orzecznictwa.” Studia z Zakresu Prawa Pracy i Polityki Społecznej 29(3): 279–290. https://doi.org/10.4467/25444654SPP.22.023.16568
Google Scholar

Williams, Colin. Frédéric Lapeyre. 2016. Dependent self-employment: Trends, challenges and policy responses in the EU Dependent self-employment. Geneva: International Labour Organization. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3082819
Google Scholar