Economically Dependent Standard as a Criterion of Employment Rights for Semi-Employed Workers in Poland
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6069.101.09Keywords:
concept of worker, scope of application of labour law, personal work, economically dependent workers, self-employed workerAbstract
The current legal status protects only employees within the meaning of Art. 2 of the Labor Code, and in a small part of contractors, it contributes to the deterioration of the situation of semi-dependent/self-employed workers, resulting in effects that are entirely opposite to the intended ones, i.e., the inclusion of the axiology of the protective function into non-employee forms of work. Poland does not have its own scope of protective provisions similar to the labor code provisions that would apply to economically semi-dependent/self-employed workers. In this article, is analyzed the concept of the economically semi-dependent/self-employed as a starting point for granting them certain employment rights. Two main conclusions can be drawn: first, the economically semi-dependent self-employed is not an intermediate category between workers and the self-employed but a subcategory of the self-employed. Secondly, failure to grant them protection by Polish labor law will have a negative impact on the extension of collective rights of the self-employed.
Downloads
References
Adserà, Alícia. Carles Boix. Mark Payne. 2003. “Are You Being Served? Political accountability and quality of government.” The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 19(2): 445–490.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/ewg017
Brameshuber, Elisabeth. 2019. “The «Personal Work Relationship» in Austria.” European Labour Journal 10(3): 187–197.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2031952519865390
Davidov, Guy. 2005. “Who is a Worker?” Industrial Law Journal 34(1): 57–71.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ilj/34.1.57
Davies, A.C.L. 2012. EU Labour Law. Cheltenham–Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
Google Scholar
Florek, Ludwik. 2015. “Ewolucja kodeksu pracy.” Studia Iuridica Lublinensia 24(3): 29–43.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17951/sil.2015.24.3.29
Freedland, Mark. 2010. The Personal Employment Contract. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Freedland, Mark. 2019. “New Trade Union Strategies for New Forms of Employment: A brief analytical and normative foreword.” European Labour Law Journal 10(3): 179–182.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2031952519865824
Gersdorf, Małgorzata. 1993. “Umowa o pracęa umowa o dzieło i zlecenia.” Praca i Zabezpieczenie Społeczne 9: 50–62.
Google Scholar
Gramano, Elena. Giovanni Gaudio. 2009. “New Trade Union Strategies for New Forms of Employment: Focus on Italy.” European Labour Law Journal 10: 240–253.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2031952519870028
Jarota, Maciej. 2015. “Funkcja ochronna prawa pracy na przykładach wybranych regulacji państw europejskich”. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska 62: Section G.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17951/g.2015.62.2.67
Latos-Miłkowska, Monika. 2013. Ochrona interesu pracodawcy. Warszawa: LexisNexis.
Google Scholar
Liszcz, Teresa. 2017. “Umowa o pracę.” In System Prawa Pracy. Vol. 2: Indywidualne prawo pracy. Część ogólna. 26–27. Ed. by Krzysztof W. Baran, Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer.
Google Scholar
Maciejewski, Sławomir. 2017. “Zasada godziwego wynagrodzenia za pracę jako prawo pracownicze.” In Ochrona praw człowieka w wymiarze uniwersalnym. Aksjologia – instytucje – nowe wyzwania – praktyka. 294–296. Ed. by Jerzy Jaskiernia, Kamil Spryszak, Toruń: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek.
Google Scholar
MOP: Ensuring better social protection for self-employed workers 2020, https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---ddg_p/documents/publication/wcms_742290.pdf (accessed: 15.07.2022).
Google Scholar
Muehlberger, Ulrike. Silvia Pasqua. 2009. Workers on the Border Between Employment and Self-employment, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=932060 (accessed: 15.07.2022).
Google Scholar
Musiała, Anna. 2011. Zatrudnienie niepracownicze. Warszawa: Difin.
Google Scholar
Mutual Learning Programme, DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion 2020, https://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId=1047 (accessed: 15.07.2022).
Google Scholar
Nowak, Monika. 2007. Prawo do godziwego wynagrodzenia za pracę. Regulacja prawna i treść. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
Google Scholar
Prusinowski, Piotr. 2019. “Prawo do wynagrodzenia.” In Międzynarodowe publiczne prawo pracy. Standardy globalne. 451–474. Ed. by Krzysztof W. Baran. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer.
Google Scholar
Sobczyk, Arkadiusz. 2014. “Różnicowanie praw (ochrony) zatrudnionych – wybrane kryteria i ich ocena.” In Funkcja ochronna prawa pracy a wyzwania współczesności. Ed. by Maria Bosak, 1, Warszawa: C.H. Beck.
Google Scholar
Świątkowski, Andrzej M. 2011. “Przedmiot stosunku pracy. Rozważania de lege lata i de lege ferenda.” In Współczesne problemy prawa pracy i ubezpieczeń społecznych. XVIII Zjazd Katedr i Zakładów Prawa Pracy i Ubezpieczeń Społecznych. Ed. by Ludwik Florek, Łukasz Pisarczyk. Warszawa: LexisNexis.
Google Scholar
Świątkowski, Andrzej M. 2015. “Prawo pracy II RP: symbioza zatrudnienia pracowniczego i cywilnoprawnego (prolegomena do współczesnego podziału zatrudnienia).” Studia z Dziejów Prawa i Państwa Polskiego 18: 169–191.
Google Scholar
Todolí-Signes, Adrián. 2019. “Workers, the Self-employed and TRADEs: Conceptualisation and collective rights 254 in Spain.” European Labour Law Journal 10(3): 254–270.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2031952519867544
Act of November 17, 1964 – Code of Civil Procedure, Journal of Laws 1964 No. 43, item 296.
Google Scholar
Act of June 26, 1974, the Labor Code, Journal of Laws 1974 No. 24, item 141.
Google Scholar
Act of 23 May 1991 on Trade Unions, Journal of Laws 1991 No. 55, item 234 as amended.
Google Scholar
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.