Wskaźnik dobrobytu na rynku pracy w Polsce i jego związek z innymi miernikami dobrostanu
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1515/cer-2016-0023Słowa kluczowe:
rynek pracy, mediana Webera, delimitacja, mierniki dobrobytu, ekonomia dobrobytuAbstrakt
W artykule zaproponowano i skonstruowano zagregowany miernik dobrobytu na rynku pracy w Polsce na przykładzie roku 2013. Miernik ten okazał się pozytywnie skorelowany z poziomem cywilizacyjnym, dobrostanem społecznym, dobrobytem materialnym i dobrostanem psychicznym. Oznacza to, że wraz z polepszeniem się sytuacji na rynku pracy poprawia się jakość życia społeczeństwa w Polsce. Nie wykazano statystycznie istotnego związku między dobrobytem na rynku pracy a współczynnikiem dzietności.
Pobrania
Bibliografia
Aknin L. B., Barrington-Leigh C. P., Dunn E. W., Helliwell J. F., Biswas-Diener R., Kemeza I., Nyende P., Ashton-James C. E., & Norton M. I. (2013), Prosocial spending and wellbeing: Crosscultural evidence for a psychological universal ,‘Journal of Personality and Social Psychology’, 104.
Google Scholar
Alesina A., La Ferrara E. (2005), Preferences for redistribution in the land of opportunitie,‘Journal of Public Economics’, 89.
Google Scholar
Atkinson A.B., Economics as a moral science:The Restoration of Welfare Economics, ‘American Economic Review’: Papers & Proceedings 2011, 101:3.
Google Scholar
Benjamin D. J., Hoffetz O., Kimball M.L., Szembrot N. (2014), Beyond Happiness and Satisfaction: Toward Well-Being Indices Based on Stated Preference, ‘American Economic Review’, 104(9).
Google Scholar
Bockerman P., Ilmakunnas, P. (2012), The job-satisfaction productivity nexus: A study using matched survey and register data, ‘Industrial & Labor Relations Review’, 65.
Google Scholar
Carnevale P. J. (2008), Positive effect and decision frame in negotiation, ‘Group Decision and Negotiation’, 17.
Google Scholar
Chang H. J. (2010), How to ‘do’ a developmental state [in]: Edigheji O (ed.) Constructing a Democratic Developmental State in South Africa: Potential and Challenges. Pretoria: HSRC Press.
Google Scholar
Charron N., Lapuente V., and Dijkstra L. (2012a), Regional governance matters: A study on regional variation in quality of government within the EU, Working Paper 01/2012, Directorate General for Regional Policy. Brussels: European Commission.
Google Scholar
Charron N., Lapuente V., and Nistotskaya M. (2012b), The wealth of regions: Government quality and entrepreneurship in Europe, Working Paper Series 2012: 12. Quality of Government Institute. Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg.
Google Scholar
Danner D. D., Snowdon D. A., & Friesen W. V. (2001), Positive emotions in early life and longevity: Findings from the nun study, ‘Journal of Personality and Social Psychology’, 80.
Google Scholar
Davidson K. W., Mostofsky E., & Whang W. (2010), Don’t worry, be happy: Positive affect and reduced 10-year incident coronary heart disease: The Canadian Nova Scotia health survey, ‘European Heart Journal’, 31.
Google Scholar
Di Tella R., MacCulloch R (2005), Partisan Social Happiness, ‘Review of Economic Studies’72.
Google Scholar
Diener E., Nickerson C., Lucas R. E., & Sandvik E. (2002), Dispositional affect and job outcomes,‘Social Indicators Research’, 59.
Google Scholar
Fleurbaey M. (2009), Beyond GDP: The Quest for a Measure of Social Welfare, ‘Journal of Economic Literature’, 47:4.
Google Scholar
Frijters P., Beatton T. (2008), The Mystery of the U-Shaped Relationship between Happiness and Age, National Centre for Econometric Research Working Paper Series No. 26. Brisbane, Australia: NCER.
Google Scholar
George, J. M., Zhou, J. (2007), Dual tuning in a supportive context: Joint contributions of positive mood, negative mood, and supervisory behaviors to employee creativity, ‘Management Journal’, 50.
Google Scholar
Graham, C., Eggers, A., & Sandip, S. (2004), Does happiness pay? An exploration based on panel data from Russia, ‘Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization’, 55.
Google Scholar
Gray M., Lobao L., Martin R. (2012), Making space for well-being The new focus on well-being, ‘Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society’, 5 (1).
Google Scholar
Hanssen G-S., Nergaard E, Pierre J, et al. (2011), Multi-level governance of regional economic development in Norway and Sweden: Too much or too little top-down control, ‘Urban Research and Practice’ 4(1).
Google Scholar
Harter J. K., Schmidt F. L., Asplund J. W., Killham E. A., & Agrawal S. (2010), Causal impact of employee work perceptions on the bottom line of organizations, ‘Perspectives on Psychological Science’, 5.
Google Scholar
Helpman E. (2004), The Mystery of Economic Growth. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Google Scholar
Jovanovic V., & Brdaric D. (2012), Did curiosity kill the cat? Evidence from subjective well-being of adolescents, ‘Personality and Individual Differences’, 52.
Google Scholar
Judge T. A., Piccolo R. F., Podsakoff, N. P., Shaw, J. C., & Rich, B. L. (2010), The relationship between pay and job satisfaction: A meta-analysis of the literature, ‘Journal of Vocational Behavior’, 77.
Google Scholar
Lount J. R. B. (2010), The impact of positive mood on trust in interpersonal and intergroup interactions, ‘Journal of Personality and Social Psychology’, 98.
Google Scholar
Michaud M.-L. (2004), Welfare And The Labour Market In The EU, European Network Of Economic Policy Research Institutes Occasional Paper No. 7/September.
Google Scholar
Marks G. N., Fleming N. (1999), Influences and consequences of well-being among Australian young people: 1980–1995,‘Social Indicators Research’, 46.
Google Scholar
Mehl M. R., Vazire S., Holleran S. E., & Clark, C. S. (2010), Eavesdropping on happiness: Well-being is related to having less small talk and more substantive conversations,‘ Psychological Science’, 21.
Google Scholar
Młodak A. (2006), Taxonomic analysis of regional statistics, Difin, Warsaw.
Google Scholar
Młodak A. (2009), Differentiation of human capital in the labor market, News Statistical, 11, Warsaw.
Google Scholar
Oswald A. J., Proto E., & Sgroi D. (2014), Happiness and productivity, University of Warwick, Manuscript submitted for publication.
Google Scholar
Panek T. (2009), Statistical Methods of multidimensional comparative analysis, SGH, Warsaw.
Google Scholar
Peterson S. J., Luthans F., Avolio B. J., Walumbwa F. O., & Zhang Z. (2011), Psychological capital and employee performance: A latent growth modeling approach, ‘Personnel Psychology’, 64.
Google Scholar
Rodrıguez-Pose A., Kristina Maslauskaite K. (2012), Can policy make us happier? Individual characteristics, socio-economic factors and life satisfaction in Central and Eastern Europe, ‘Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society’, 5.
Google Scholar
Russ T. C., Stamatakis E., Hamer M., Starr J. M., Kivimaki M., & Batty, G. D. (2012), Association between psychological distress and mortality: Individual participant pooled analysis of 10 prospective cohort studies, ‘British Medical Journal’, 31, 345.
Google Scholar
Śliwicki, Ryczkowski (2014), Gender Pay Gap In The Micro Level – Case Of Poland, Quantitative Methods In Economics, Vol. XV, No. 1.
Google Scholar
Sotarauta M., Horlings L., and Liddle J. (2012), Leadership and Change in Sustainable Regional Development, Abingdon: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Social Diagnosis (2013), Terms and quality of life of Poles, ed. Czapiński J., Panek T., Warsaw.
Google Scholar
Statistical analysis using the program R, ed. Walesiak M.,Gatnar E. (2012); OWN, Warsaw.
Google Scholar
Stutzer A, Frey B.S. (2008), Stress that Doesn’t Pay: The Commuting Paradox, ‘Scandinavian Journal of Economics’110(2).
Google Scholar
Tay L., Tan K., Diener E., & Gonzalez, E. (2013), Social relations, health behaviors, and health outcomes: A survey and synthesis, ‘Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being’, Mar; 5(1).
Google Scholar
The Global Competitiveness Report (2013–2014) ,World Economic Forum. (ed.) Schwab K.
Google Scholar
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Jak cytować
Numer
Dział
Licencja
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/4.0/88x31.png)
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.