Prolific Inventor Productivity and Mobility: A Western/Asian com-parison. Evidence from US Patent Data for 12 Countries

Authors

  • Christian Le Bas University of Lyon 2, France
  • William Latham University of Delaware, USA
  • Dmitry Volodin HDR Inc., Silver Spring, MD, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2478/v10103-012-0030-x

Abstract

This paper provides new insights into the role of individual inventors in the innovation process. Individuals are central in this creative process because innovation is not simply a product of firms and organizations; it requires individual creativity (Rothaermel and Hess, 2007). We focus our analysis on prolific inventors (a rich sub category of inventors) because they contribute so hugely to national invention totals (Le Bas et al., 2010) and tend to produce inventions that have more economic value (Gambardella et al., 2005; Gay et al., 2008). Converging empirical evidence has established the significance of prolific inventors (Ernst et al., 2000). Previous studies of prolific (or “key”) inventors have focused more on the firms in which they work or on the industries in which the firms operate. Narin and Breitzman’s (1995) seminal work on the topic is based on an analysis of only four firms in a single sector and a recent paper by Pilkington et al. (2009) uses only two firms. In contrast to these studies on small samples, we use a very large data set which includes thousands of inventors in thousands of firms from several countries.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Breschi S. et al. (2010), The Geography of Knowledge Spillovers: the role of inventors’mobility across firms and in space. in R. Boschma and R. Marton eds The Handbook of Evolutionary Economic Geography. Edward Elgar Cheltenham UK
Google Scholar

Dodgson M. and D. Gann (2010), Innovation. A very short introduction. Oxford. University Press. Oxford and. New York
Google Scholar

Ernst D. (2005), Pathways to innovation in Asia’s leading electronics exporting countries – a framework for exploring drivers and policy implications. International Journal of Technology Management, Vol 29. N°1-2, pp. 6-20
Google Scholar

Ernst H., Leptien C., Vitt J. (2000), Inventors are not alike: The Distribution of Patenting Output among Industrial R&D Personnel, in: IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 47, No. 2, pp. 184-199
Google Scholar

Fagerberg F. and Godinho (2006), Innovation and Catching up, in Fagerberg F., Mowery D.C., Richard R. Nelson R.R eds The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford University Press; pp 514-542
Google Scholar

Felsenstein D. (2011), Human capital and labour mobility determinants of regional innovation. In COOKE (Philip), ASHEIM (Bjor ), BOSCHMA (Ron) et al. Handbook of regional innovation and growth. Edward Elgar
Google Scholar

Gambardella A., Harhoff D., Verspagen B. (2006), The value of Patents. Paper presented at the NBER Conference. The Economics of Intellectual Property. Cambridge (MA), July 19th
Google Scholar

Gay C. and Le Bas C. (2005), Uses without too much abuses of patents citations or the simple Economics of Patents Citations as a measure of the value and origin of codified Knowledge. The Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Vol. 14 (5), July, pp 333-338
Google Scholar

Gay C., Latham B., Le Bas C. (2008), Collective Knowledge, Prolific Inventors and the Value of Inventions: An Empirical Study of French, German and British Owned U.S. Patents, 1975-1998. The Economics of Innovation and New Technology. Volume 17, Jan. -March. pp 5- 22
Google Scholar

Hoisl K. (2007), Tracing mobile inventors-The causality between inventor mobility and inventor productivity, Research Policy, n° 36, pp. 619-636
Google Scholar

Hoisl K. (2009), Does Mobility Increase the Productivity of Inventors? Journal of Technology Transfer, 34(2)
Google Scholar

Latham W., Le Bas C., R. Bouklia-Hassane, C. Le Bas C., D. Volodine (2011), Interregional mobility, productivity and the value of patents for prolific inventors in France, Germany and the U-K. International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy. Vol. 7, N° 1/2/3. pp 92-113
Google Scholar

Latham W., Le Bas C., Volodin D. (2012), Value of invention, prolific inventor productivity and mobility: evidence from five countries, 1975-2002. Economies et Sociétés. Série W, N°14. pp 11-40
Google Scholar

Le Bas C., Cabagnols, A., Bouklia, R. (2010), Prolific Inventors: Who are They and Where do They Locate? Evidence from a Five Countries US Patenting Data Set. International Centre for Economic Research Working Paper No. 14/2010. Available at SSRN: hhtp://ssm.com/abstract=1625743
Google Scholar

Lundvall Bengt-Ake et al. (2009), Introduction. Handbook of Innovation Systems and Developing Countries. Ed. Lundvall, Joseph, Chaminade, Vang. Cheltenham. Northampton: Edward Elgar. 2009
Google Scholar

Narin F. and Breitzman A. (1995), Inventive productivity. Research Policy, 24, 507-519
Google Scholar

Pilkington A. et al. (2009), Defining key inventors: A comparison of fuel cell and nanotechnology industries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 76 (1), pp. 118-127
Google Scholar

Rothaermel F.T. and Hess A. (2007). Building dynamic capabilities: Innovation driven by individual, firm, and network-level effects. Organization Science, 18 (6): 898-921
Google Scholar

Saxenian A. L. (2006), The New Argonauts: Regional Advantage in the Global Economy. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Google Scholar

Schankerman M., Shalem R., Trajtenberg M. (2006), Software Patents, Inventors and Mobility, Working Paper
Google Scholar

Trajtenberg M. (2004), The names game: Using Inventors Patent Data in Economic Research. Power-point Presentation. http://www.tau.ac.il/~manuel/
Google Scholar

Trajtenberg M., Shiff G., Melamed R. (2006). The "Names Game": Harnessing Inventors' Patent Data for Economic. Research. NBER working paper series, No. w12479, September
Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2013-03-08

How to Cite

Le Bas, C., Latham, W., & Volodin, D. (2013). Prolific Inventor Productivity and Mobility: A Western/Asian com-parison. Evidence from US Patent Data for 12 Countries. Comparative Economic Research. Central and Eastern Europe, 15(4), 117–132. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10103-012-0030-x

Issue

Section

Articles