CO2 Emissions in the Visegrad Group Countries and the European Union Climate Policy

Dorota Wawrzyniak

doi:10.18778/1508-2008.23.05

Authors

Dorota Wawrzyniak Ph.D., University of Lodz, Faculty of Economics and Sociology Department of Economic Mechanisms, Lodz, Poland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1508-2008.23.05

Keywords:

carbon dioxide emissions, LMDI decomposition analysis, the European Union climate policy, Visegrad Group countries

Abstract

Climate change is one of the most pressing challenges of our time and several policies trying to mitigate this negative phenomenon have been implemented. The reduction of GHG emissions along with the improvement in energy efficiency and the increase in the share of energy consumption from renewable sources also constitute the European Union policy priority. In this context, the aim of this article is to explore factors that affect changes in CO2 emissions in the four EU member states that form the Visegrad Group, during the period 1993–2016. The analysis was conducted using the Logarithmic Mean Divisia Index (LMDI) decomposition method and the Kaya identity, which enables the factors contributing most to the CO2 emissions changes to be identified. It also allows the results to be discussed in relation to the European Union’s climate policy. According to the decomposition analysis results, energy intensity and economic growth measured in terms of GDP per capita were the main factors driving changes in CO2 emissions across all countries considered. The emissions decrease resulted mainly from an improvement in energy efficiency and to a lesser extent from the change in the energy mix towards renewables.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ang, B.W. (2004), Decomposition analysis for policy making in energy: which is the preferred method?, “Energy Policy”, Vol. 32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(03)00076-4

Ang, B.W. (2005), The LMDI approach to decomposition analysis: a practical guide, “Energy Policy”, Vol. 33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2003.10.010

Ang, B.W. (2015), LMDI decomposition approach: A guide for implementation, “Energy Policy”, Vol. 86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.07.007

Ang, B.W., Goh, T. (2019), Index decomposition analysis for comparing emission scenarios: Applications and challenges, “Energy Economics”, Vol. 83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.06.013

Ang, B.W., Zhang, F.Q., Choi, K.H. (1998), Factorizing changes in energy and environmental indicators through decomposition, “Energy”, Vol. 23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S03605442(98)00016-4

Calbick, K.S., Gunton, T. (2014), Differences among OECD countries’ GHG emissions: Causes and policy implications, “Energy Policy”, Vol. 67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.12.030

Cansino, J.M, Sánchez-Braza, A., Rodríguez-Arévalo, M.L. (2015), Driving forces of Spain’s CO2 emissions: A LMDI decomposition approach, “Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews”, Vol. 48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.011

Chapman, A., Fujii, H., Managi, S. (2018), Key drivers for cooperation toward sustainable development and the management of CO2 emissions: Comparative analysis of six Northeast Asian countries, “Sustainability”, Vol. 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10010244

Chen, J., Wang, P., Cui, L., Huang, S., Song, M. (2018), Decomposition and decoupling analysis of CO2 emissions in OECD, “Applied Energy”, Vol. 231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.09.179

Conclusions on 2030 Climate and Energy Policy Framework (2014), European Council, https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/ec/145356.pdf (accessed: 10.04.2019).

Directive (EU) 2018/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources (2018), “Official Journal of the European Union”, L. 328, Vol. 61.

Directive (EU) 2018/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 amending Directive 2012/27/EU on energy efficiency (2018), “Official Journal of the European Union”, L. 328, Vol. 61.

Engo, J. (2018), Decomposing the decoupling of CO2 emissions from economic growth in Cameroon, “Environmental Science and Pollution Research”, Vol. 25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3511-z

Europe 2020: A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth (2010), Communication from the European Commission, Brussels 3.3.2010, COM (2010) 2020 final, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2010:2020:FIN:EN:PDF (accessed: 21.05.2015).

Fatima, T., Xia, E., Cao, Z., Khan, D., Fan, J-L. (2019), Decomposition analysis of energy-related CO2 emission in the industrial sector of China: Evidence from the LMDI approach, “Environmental Science and Pollution Research”, Vol. 26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05468-5

Feng, C., Huang, J.-B., Wang, M. (2018), The driving forces and potential mitigation of energy-related CO2 emissions in China’s metal industry, “Resources Policy”, Vol. 59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2018.09.003

Freitas, L.C., Kaneko, S. (2011), Decomposition of CO2 emissions change from energy consumption in Brazil: Challenges and policy implications, “Energy Policy”, Vol. 39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.12.023

González, P.F., Landajo, M., Presno, M.J. (2014a), The driving forces behind changes in CO2 emission levels in EU-27. Differences between member states, “Environmental Science & Policy”, Vol. 38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2013.10.007

González, P.F., Landajo, M., Presno M.J. (2014b), Tracking European Union CO2 emissions through LDMI (logarithmic mean divisia index) decomposition. The activity revaluation approach, “Energy”, Vol. 73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.06.078

Karmellos, M., Kopidou, D., Diakoulaki, D. (2016), A decomposition analysis of the driving factors of CO2 (Carbon dioxide) emissions from the power sector in the European Union countries, “Energy”, Vol. 94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.10.145

Köne, A.Ç., Büke, T. (2019), Factor analysis of projected carbon dioxide emissions according to the IPCC based sustainable emission scenario in Turkey, “Renewable Energy”, Vol. 133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.10.099

Kumbaroğlu, G. (2011), A sectoral decomposition analysis of Turkish CO2 emissions over 1990–2007, “Energy”, Vol. 36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2011.01.027

Li, W., Ou, Q., Chen, Y. (2014), Decomposition of China’s CO2 emissions from agriculture utilizing an improved Kaya identity, “Environmental Science and Pollution Research”, Vol. 21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3250-8

Lima, F., Nunes, M.L., Cunha, J., Lucena, A.F.P. (2016), A cross-country assessment of energy-related CO2 emissions: An extended Kaya Index Decomposition Approach, “Energy”, Vol. 115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.05.037

Madaleno, M., Moutinho, V. (2017), A new LDMI decomposition approach to explain emission development in the EU: Individual and set contribution, “Environmental Science and Pollution Research”, Vol. 24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-8547-y

Mavromatidis, G., Orehounig, K., Richner, P., Carmeliet, J. (2016), A strategy for reducing CO2 emissions from buildings with the Kaya identity – A Swiss energy system analysis and a case study, “Energy Policy”, Vol. 88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.10.037

Moutinho, V., Moreira, A.C., Silva, P.M. (2015), The driving forces of change in energy-related CO2 emissions in Eastern, Western, Northern and Southern Europe: The LMDI approach to decomposition analysis, “Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews”, Vol. 50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.05.072

O’Mahony, T. (2013), Decomposition of Ireland’s carbon emissions from 1990 to 2010: An extended Kaya identity, “Energy Policy”, Vol. 59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.04.013

Pakulski, J. (ed.) (2016), The Visegrad countries in crisis, Collegium Civitas, Warszawa.

Pao, H.-T., Tsai, C.-M. (2011), Multivariate Granger causality between CO2 emissions, energy consumption, FDI (foreign direct investment) and GDP (gross domestic product): Evidence from a panel of BRIC (Brazil, Russian Federation, India, and China) countries, “Energy”, Vol. 36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.09.041

Remuzgo, L., Sarabia, J.M. (2015), International inequality in CO2 emissions: A new factorial decomposition based on Kaya factors, “Environmental Science & Policy”, Vol. 54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.05.020

Shahiduzzaman, Md., Layton, A. (2015), Changes in CO2 emissions over business cycle recessions and expansions in the United States: A decomposition analysis, “Applied Energy”, Vol. 150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.04.007

Štreimikienė, D., Balezentis, T. (2016), Kaya identity for analysis of the main drivers of GHG emissions and feasibility to implement EU “20–20–20” targets in the Baltic States, “Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews”, Vol. 58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.311

Tang, C.F., Tan, B.W. (2015), The impact of energy consumption, income and foreign direct investment on carbon dioxide emissions in Vietnam, “Energy”, Vol. 79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.11.033

Vehmas, J., Kaivo-oja, J., Luukkanen, J. (2018), Energy efficiency as a driver of total primary energy supply in the EU-28 countries – incremental decomposition analysis, “Heliyon”, Vol. 4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00878

Wang, H., Ang, B.W., Su, B. (2017), Multi-region structural decomposition analysis of global CO2 emission intensity, “Ecological Economics”, Vol. 142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.06.023

Wang, Q., Li, R. (2016), Drivers for energy consumption: A comparative analysis of China and India, “Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews”, Vol. 62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.04.048