Reflections On Employment Protection Legislation: An International Comparison

Samir Amine

doi:10.1515/cer-2015-0007

Autor

Samir Amine University of Quebec (Outaouais), Department of Industrial and Labor Relations, Canada, CIRANO

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1515/cer-2015-0007

Słowa kluczowe:

ochrona zatrudnienia, Francja, Kanada, bezpieczeństwo, bezrobocie

Abstrakt

W Europie, podobnie jak w pozostałych krajach uprzemysłowionych, reformy rynku pracy dotyczą na ogół ustawodawstwa w zakresie ochrony zatrudnienia (EPL). Jednym z głównych zadań tego ustawodawstwa jest zapewnienie bezpieczeństwa pracowników, w szczególności w przypadku zwolnienia z pracy. Celem niniejszego artykułu jest porównanie surowości i stopnia sztywności EPL dwóch różnych gospodarek, a mianowicie, Kanady i Francji. Wybór tych dwóch państw wynikał z faktu, że polityka rynku pracy w obu państwach jest odmiennie zorientowana i opiera się na różnych podstawach ideologicznych.

Pobrania

Brak dostępnych danych do wyświetlenia.

Bibliografia

Acemoglu D., Angrist J.D. (2001), Consequences of Employment Protection? The Case of the Americans with Disabilities Act, ‘Journal of Political Economy’ no. 109(5). doi: 10.1086/322836
Google Scholar

Addison J.T., Teixeira P. (2003), The Economics of Employment Protection, ‘Journal of Labour Research’ no. 24.
Google Scholar

Amine S. (2014), Les politiques du marché du travail face à la crise économique : vers une convergence internationale, Québec : Les Presses de l'Université Laval.
Google Scholar

Autor D.H., Donohue J.J., Schwab S.J. (2004), The Employment Consequences of Wrongful-Discharge Laws: Large, Small, or None at All ?, ‘American Economic Review’ no. 94. doi: 10.1257/0002828041302091
Google Scholar

Autor D.H., Donohue J.J., Schwab S.J. (2006), The Costs of Wrongful-Discharge Laws, ‘The Review of Economics and Statistics’ no. 88. doi: 10.1162/rest.88.2.211
Google Scholar

Bassanini A., Garnero A. (2013), Dismissal Protection and Worker Flows in OECD Countries: Evidence from Cross-Country/Cross-Industry Data, ‘Labour Economics’ no. 21. doi: 10.1016/j.labeco.2012.12.003
Google Scholar

Baranowska A., Gebel M., Kotowska I.E. (2011), The role of fixed-term contracts at labour market entry in Poland: stepping stones, screening devices, traps or search subsidies?, ‘Work, employment and Society’, no. 25.
Google Scholar

Behaghel L., Crépon B., Sédillot B. (2008), The perverse effects of partial employment protection reform: The case of French older workers, ‘Journal of Public Economics’ no. 92. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.12.004
Google Scholar

Bentolila S., Bertola G. (1990). Firing Costs and Labour Demand: How Bad Is Eurosclerosis?, ‘Review of Economic Studies’ no. 57. doi: 10.2307/2298020
Google Scholar

Bertola G. (1990). Job security, employment and wages, ‘European Economic Review’ no. 34. doi: 10.1016/0014-2921(90)90066-8
Google Scholar

Bertola G., Boeri Tito., Cazes S. (2000), Employment protection in industrialzed countries: the case of new indicators, ‘International Labour Review’ no. 139.
Google Scholar

Bevort A., Lallement M., Drancourt C. (2006), Flexicurité : Protection de l'emploi en débat, ‘Problèmes politiques et sociaux’ no. 931.
Google Scholar

Blanchard O., Portugal P. (2001), What Hides Behind an Unemployment Rate: Comparing Portuguese and US Labour Markets, ‘American Economic Review’ no. 91. doi: 10.1257/aer.91.1.187
Google Scholar

Blanchard O., Tirole J. (2003), Protection de l'emploi et procédures de licenciement, Rapport du Centre d'Analyse Economique, Paris.
Google Scholar

Blanchard O., Tirole J. (2003), The Optimal Design of Unemployment Insurance and Employment Protection: a first pass, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Economics.
Google Scholar

Blanchard O., Wolfers. (2000), The Role of Shocks and Institutions in the Rise of European Unemployment: The Aggregate Evidence, ‘Economic Journal’ no. 110. doi: 10.1111/1468-0297.00518
Google Scholar

Boeri T., Garibaldi P. (2005), Are Labour Markets in the New Member States Sufficiently Flexible for the EMU?, ‘Journal of Banking & Finance’ no. 30.
Google Scholar

Boulhol H. (2014), Making the Labour Market Work Better in Poland, ‘OECD Economics Department Working Papers’, no. 1124.
Google Scholar

Cahuc P., Jolivet G. (2003), Do We Need More Stringent Employment Protection Legislations?, document interne, Université Paris 1, Paris.
Google Scholar

Cahuc P., Kramarz F. (2004), De la précarité à la mobilité : vers une sécurité sociale professionnelle, rapport au Ministre de l’économie et des finances et au Ministre de l'emploi, France.
Google Scholar

Cazes S., Tonin M. (2010), Législation sur la protection de l'emploi et stabilité des emplois: une analyse transversale en Europe, ‘Revue internationale du Travail’ no. 149.
Google Scholar

Cazes S., Nesporova A. (2003), Labour Markets in Transition: Balancing flexibility and security in Central and Eastern Europe, Geneva: ILO.
Google Scholar

Coxkx Bart., Van Der Linden B. (2010), La flexicurité en Belgique: une proposition fondée sur des principes économiques, ‘Revue internationale du Travail’ no. 149.
Google Scholar

Di Tella R., MacCulloch R. (2005), The Consequences of Labor Market Flexibility: Panel Evidence Based on Survey Data, ‘European Economic Review’ no. 49. doi: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2003.11.002
Google Scholar

Elmeskov J., Martin J.P., Scarpetta S. (1998), Key Lessons for Labour Market Reforms: Evidence from OECD Countries’ Experience, ‘Swedish Economic Policy Review’.
Google Scholar

Fernández-Kranz D., Rodríguez-Planas N. (2011), Unintended Effects of a Family-Friendly Law in a Segmented Labor Market, Discussion Papers 5709, Institute for the Study of Labour (IZA).
Google Scholar

Grubb D., Wells W. (1993), La réglementation de l'emploi et les formes de travail dans les pays de l'OCDE, ‘Revue économique de l'OCDE’ no. 21.
Google Scholar

Haltiwanger J., Scarpetta S., Schweiger H. (2014), Cross country differences in job reallocation: The role of industry, firm size and regulations, ‘Labour Economics’ no. 26. doi: 10.1016/j.labeco.2013.10.001
Google Scholar

Kirat T. (2006), Les indicateurs de protection de l'emploi : la mesure du droit du travail en question?, Paris Dauphine, France.
Google Scholar

Kluve J., Lehmann H., Schmidt C.M. (1999), Active Labor Market Policies in Poland: Human Capital Enhancement, Stigmatization, or Benefit Churning?, ‘Journal of Comparative Economics’ no. 27. doi: 10.1006/jcec.1998.1573
Google Scholar

Kugler A.D., Saint-Paul G. (2004), How Do Firing Costs Affect Worker Flows in a World with Adverse Selection?, ‘Journal of Labour Economics’ no. 22. doi: 10.1086/383107
Google Scholar

Lazear E.P. (1990), Job Security Provisions and Employment, The Quarterly Journal of Economics.
Google Scholar

OCDE. (1993), Perspectives de l'emploi, Paris.
Google Scholar

OCDE. (1994), Etudes de l'OCDE sur l'emploi ; données et explications, Partie II, Paris.
Google Scholar

OCDE. (1999), Perspectives de l'emploi, Paris.
Google Scholar

OCDE. (2004), Perspective de l'emploi de l'OCDE. Réglementation relative à la protection de l'emploi et performance du marché du travail chapitre 2.
Google Scholar

OCDE. (2013), Perspectives de l'emploi, Paris.
Google Scholar

Meilland C. (2010), Danemark. La crise, l'austérité et le modèle de flexicurité, ‘Chronique internationale’ no. 127.
Google Scholar

Mortensen D.T., Pissarides C.A. (1999), Unemployment Responses to 'Skill-Biased' Technology Shocks: The Role of Labour Market Policy, ‘Economic Journal’ no. 109. doi: 10.1111/1468-0297.00431
Google Scholar

Nickell S J. (1978), Fixed Costs, Employment and Labour Demand over the Cycle, ‘Economica’ no. 45.
Google Scholar

Romih D., Festić M. (2008), Labour Market Flexibility and Employment Protection Legislation in the New EU Member States, Economic Institute of the Law School, University of Maribor.
Google Scholar

Scarpetta S. (1996), Le rôle des politiques du marché du travail et des dispositions institutionnelles concernant le chômage : une comparaison internationale, ‘Revue économique de l'OCDE’ no. 26.
Google Scholar

Tonin M. (2009), Employment protection legislation indicators for Central and Eastern European Countries, ‘South-East Europe Review’, no. 4.
Google Scholar