An Empirical Study Of Productivity Growth In EU28 - Spatial Panel Analysis

Alicja Olejnik

doi:10.2478/cer-2014-0040

Autor

Alicja Olejnik University of Lodz, Faculty of Economics and Sociology, Department of Spatial Econometrics

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2478/cer-2014-0040

Słowa kluczowe:

przestrzenny model panelowy, ekonometria przestrzenna, wzrost produktywności

Abstrakt

W pracy zaprezentowano przestrzenną analizę procesu wzrostu produktywności w Unii Europejskiej w oparciu o elementy teorii Nowej Ekonomii Geograficznej. Do analizy na poziomie regionów NUTS 2, zastosowano macierze wag przestrzennych w celu lepszego opisu interakcji przestrzennych pomiędzy regionami UE. Ponadto przedmiotem referatu jest próba zbadania pewnych nowych metod konstrukcji macierzy wag, w tym jej parametryzacji. W badaniu wykorzystano przestrzenny model panelowy z efektami stałymi. Zatem całość rozważań stanowi nowy element ekonometrii przestrzennej, a poprzez włączenie dodatkowej informacji na temat badanego zjawiska umożliwia wnikliwszą jego analizę.

Pobrania

Brak dostępnych danych do wyświetlenia.

Bibliografia

Anselin L. (1988), Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Google Scholar

Anselin L., Bera A.K. (1998), Spatial dependence in linear regression models with an introduction to spatial econometrics, [in:] Ullah A., Giles D. (ed.). Handbook of Applied Economic Statistics, Marcel Dekker, New York.
Google Scholar

Bernat G. A. (1996), Does Manufacturing Matter. A Spatial Econometric View of Kaldor’s Laws, Journal of Regional Science, 36, 463-477.
Google Scholar

Burridge, P., Gordon I. (1981), Unemployment in the British Metropolitan Labour Areas, Oxford Economic Papers, 33(2), 274-297.
Google Scholar

Combes P. P., Lafourcade M. (2001), Transportation costs decline and regional inequalities: evidence from France, CEPR DP 2894.
Google Scholar

Combes P. P., Lafourcade M. (2004), Trade costs and regional disparities in a model of economic geography: structural estimations and predictions for France, http://www.enpc.fr/ceras/combes/
Google Scholar

Combes P. P., Overman H. (2003), The spatial distribution of economic activity in the EU, CEPR DP 3999.
Google Scholar

Corrado L., Fingleton B. (2012), Where is the economics in spatial econometrics?, Journal of Regional Science, 52 (2): 210-39. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9787.2011.00726.x
Google Scholar

EUROSTAT (2002), European Regional Statistics. Reference guide, European Communities, Luxembourg.
Google Scholar

Fingleton B. (2000), Spatial econometrics, economic geography, dynamics and equilibrium: a third way? Environment and Planning A, 32, 1481-1498.
Google Scholar

Fingleton B. (2001), Equilibrium and economic growth: spatial econometric models and simulations, Journal of Regional Science, 41, 117-147.
Google Scholar

Fingleton B. (2003), Increasing returns: evidence from local wage rates in Great Britain. Oxford Economic Papers, 55, 716-739.
Google Scholar

Fingleton B. (2004a), Regional economic growth and convergence: insights from a spatial econometric perspective, [in:] Anselin L., Florax R., Rey S. (ed.) Advances in Spatial Econometrics, Springer- Verlag, Berlin, 397-432.
Google Scholar

Fingleton B. (2004b), Some alternative geo-economics for Europe's regions, Journal of Economic Geography, 4, 389-420.
Google Scholar

Fingleton B. (2006), The new economic geography versus urban economics: an evaluation using local wage rates in Great Britain, Oxford Econ Pap., 58, 501-530.
Google Scholar

Fingleton B., Lopez-Bazo E. (2006), Empirical growth models with spatial effects, Papers in Regional Science, 85(2), 177-198. doi: 10.1111/j.1435-5957.2006.00074.X
Google Scholar

Fingleton B. (2007), A multi-equation spatial econometric model, with application to EU manufacturing productivity growth. Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, 9(2), 119-144. doi: 10.1007/s10109-006-0038-5
Google Scholar

Fingleton B., McCann P. (2007), Sinking the iceberg? On the treatment of transport costs in new economic geography, [in:] Fingleton B. (ed.) New directions in economic geography. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 168-203.
Google Scholar

Fingleton B., McCombie J. S. L. (1998), Increasing returns and economic growth: Some evidence for manufacturing from the European Union regions, Oxford Economic Papers, 50, 89-105.
Google Scholar

Fischer, M.M., Scherngell T., Jansenberger E. (2006), The Geography of Knowledge Spillovers Between High-Technology Firms in Europe: Evidence from a Spatial Interaction Modelling Perspective, Geographical Analysis, 38(3), 288-309. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-4632.2006.00687.X
Google Scholar

Fischer M.M., Scherngell T., Reismann M. (2009), Knowledge Spillovers and Total Factor Productivity: Evidence Using a Spatial Panel Data Model, Geographical Analysis, 41(2), 204-220. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-4632.2009.00752.x
Google Scholar

Fujita M., Krugman P., Venables A. (1999), The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions, and International Trade, Cambridge MA.
Google Scholar

Kakamu K. (2005), Bayesian Estimation of a Distance Functional Weight Matrix Model, Economics Bulletin, 3(57), 1-6.
Google Scholar

Kaldor N. (1957), A Model of Economic Growth, Economic Journal, 67, 591-624.
Google Scholar

Olejnik A. (2008), Using the spatial autoregressively distributed lag model in assessing the regional convergence of per-capita income in the EU25, Papers in Regional Science, Wiley, 87/3.
Google Scholar

Olejnik A. (2012), Wielowymiarowe autoregresyjne modele przestrzenne, [in:] Ekonometria przestrzenna II, Modele zaawansowane, (ed.) Suchecki B., C.H. Beck, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Redding S., Venables A. J. (2004), Economic geography and international inequality, Journal of International Economics., 62, 53-82.
Google Scholar

Vega S.H., Elhorst J.P. (2013), On spatial econometric models, spillover effects, and W, ERSA working papers, http://www-sre.wu.ac.at/ersa/ersaconfs/ersa13/ERSA2013_paper_00222.pdf
Google Scholar

Verdoorn P.J. (1949), Fattori che Regolano lo Sviluppo della Produttivita del Lavoro, L’Industria, 1, 3-10.
Google Scholar