Efficiency of National Innovation Systems – Poland and Bulgaria in The Context of the Global Innovation Index

Barbara Jankowska; Anna Matysek-Jędrych; Katarzyna Mroczek-Dąbrowska

doi:10.1515/cer-2017-0021

Autor

Barbara Jankowska Poznań University of Economics and Business, Department of the International Competitiveness
Anna Matysek-Jędrych
Katarzyna Mroczek-Dąbrowska

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1515/cer-2017-0021

Słowa kluczowe:

narodowy system innowacji, Polska, Bułgaria

Abstrakt

Celem niniejszego artykułu jest wyjaśnienie, jak narodowe systemy innowacji (NSI) są używane do kreacji innowacji. Posługując się wskaźnikiem Global Innovation Index (GII) omówiono, co można rozumieć pod pojęciem innowacji oraz zasygnalizowano, jak innowacje mogą oddziaływać na gospodarkę. Pytanie badawcze oparto na założeniu, że im wyższe nakłady na innowacje, tym kraj jest w stanie osiągnąć lepsze efekty aktywności innowacyjnej. W celu weryfikacji tego założenia zastosowano metodę analizy klastrowej w odniesieniu do 228 gospodarek. Następnie przeprowadzono pogłębioną analizę dwóch przypadków (Polski i Bułgarii), które odbiegały od wzorca zidentyfikowanego w wynikach analizy klastrowej. Stosując analizę porównawczą próbowano nakreślić jak i dlaczego NSI nie zdołały (lub odwrotnie) wykreować pożądanego poziomu innowacji.

Pobrania

Brak dostępnych danych do wyświetlenia.

Bibliografia

Bozeman B., Dietz J.S. (2001), Research Policy Trends in the United States, [in:] Laredo P., Mustar P. (eds), Research and innovation policy in the new global economy, an international comparative analysis, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham 2001: 47–78.
Google Scholar

Breschi S., Malerba F. (1997), Sectoral innovation systems, [in:] Edquist, C. (ed.), Systems of innovation: Technologies, institutions and organizations, Pinter Publishers, London.
Google Scholar

Bukowski M., Szpor A., Śniegocki A. (2012), Potencjał i bariery polskiej innowacyjności, Instytut Badań Strukturalnych, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Cai Y. (2011), Factors Affecting the Efficiency of the BRICS’ National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Study Based on DEA and Panel Data Analysis, ʻEconomicsʼ (open eJournal), Economics Discussion Papers, 52.
Google Scholar

Cainelli G., Evangelista R., Savona M. (2006), Innovation and economic performance in services: a firm‑level analysis, ʼCambridge Journal of Economicsʼ, 30(30): 435–458.
Google Scholar

Carayannis E.G., Alexander J., Ioannidis A. (2000), Leveraging knowledge, learning, and innovation in forming strategic government‑university‑industry (GUI) R&D partnerships in the US, Germany, and France, ‘Technovation’ 20: 477–488.
Google Scholar

Carlsson B., Stankiewicz R. (1991), On the nature, function and composition of technological systems, ‘Journal of Evolutionary Economics’ 1(2): 93–118.
Google Scholar

Chaminade C.L., Bengt‑Åke J. Van Joseph K.J. (2009), Designing Innovation Policies for Development: Towards a Systematic Experimentation‑Based Approach, [in:] Lundvall, B‑Å., Joseph, K.J., Chaminade, C., Vang, J. (eds.), Handbook of innovation Systems and Developing Countries: Building Domestic Capabilities in a Global Setting, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham.
Google Scholar

Cohen M., Levinthal D.A. (1990), Absorptive Capacity. A New Perspective on Learning and Innovations, ‘Administrative Science Quarterly’, 35(1): 128–152.
Google Scholar

Correa C. (1998), Argentina’s national innovation system, ‘International Journal of Technology Management’ 1998, 15 (6–7): 721–760.
Google Scholar

Cunningham P., Gök A. (2012), The Impact and Effectiveness of Policies to Support Collaboration for R&D and Innovation, Compendium of Evidence on the effectiveness of Innovation Policy, MIoIR‑NESTA, Manchester/London.
Google Scholar

David P.A., Hall B.H., Toole A.A. (2000), Is public R&D a complement or substitute for private R&D? A review of the econometric evidence, ‘Research Policy’, 29: 497–529.
Google Scholar

Debreu G. (1951), The Coefficient of Resource Utilization, ‘Econometrica’, 19(3): 273–292.
Google Scholar

Dodgson M. (1993), On organizational learning: a review of some literatures, ‘Organizational Studies’, 14: 375–394.
Google Scholar

Edquist C. (2004), Systems of Innovation: Perspectives and Challenges, [in:] Fagerberg J., Mowery D., Nelson R. (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Innovation, Oxford University Press, Oxford: 181–208.
Google Scholar

Eurostat (2016), R&D expenditure, http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat [accessed 11.08.2016].
Google Scholar

Farrell M.J. (1951), The Measurement of Productive Efficiency, ‘Journal of the Royal Statistical Society’, 120: 253–281.
Google Scholar

Foray D. (1994), Production and Distribution of Knowledge in the New Systems of Innovations: The Role of Intellectual Property Rights, ‘STI Review’, 14: 119–152.
Google Scholar

Freeman C. (1987), Technology and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan, Pinter, London.
Google Scholar

Gault F. (2010), Innovation and Development, in: Innovation Strategies for a Global Economy, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham: 133–164.
Google Scholar

Gick W. (1998), Why institutions do not learn?, Proceedings of the 10th EAEPE Conference, Lisbon, 1: 277–288.
Google Scholar

The Global Innovation Index (2015), Effective Innovation Policies for Development, Cornell University, INSEAD, and WIPO, Fontainebleau, Ithaca, and Geneva.
Google Scholar

Goh S., Richards G. (1997), Benchmarking the Learning Capability of Organizations, ‘European Management Journal’, 15(5): 575–583.
Google Scholar

Hobday M. (2005), Form‑Level Innovation Models: Perspectives on Research in Developed and Developing Countries, ‘Technology Analysis & Strategic Management’, 17(2): 121–146.
Google Scholar

Hsu Y. (2011), Cross National Comparison of Innovation Efficiency and Policy Application, ‘African Journal of Business Management’, 5(4): 1378–1387.
Google Scholar

Hughes T.P. (1983), Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society, 1880–1930, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
Google Scholar

Jankowska B. (2013), Coopetition as an attribute of clusters fostering innovativeness of enterprises – the case of one creative cluster, ‘International Journal of Business and Management Studies’, 5(1): 1309–8047 (Online).
Google Scholar

Jankowska B., Mroczek‑Dąbrowska K., Gorynia M., Dzikowska M. (2016), Are Firms in Corporate Groups More Resilient During an Economic Crisis? Evidence from the Manufacturing Sector in Poland, ‘Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation’, 12(4): 5–28.
Google Scholar

Kowalski A. (2013), Znaczenie klastrów dla innowacyjności gospodarki w Polsce, SGH, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Klette T.J., Moen J.G.Z. (2000), Do subsidies to commercial R&D reduce market failure? Microeconometric evaluation studies, ‘Research Policy’, 29: 471–495.
Google Scholar

Köhler C., Larédo P., Rammer C. (2012), The Impact and Effectiveness of Fiscal Incentives for R&D, Compendium of Evidence on the effectiveness of Innovation Policy, MIoIR‑NESTA, Manchester/London.
Google Scholar

Koopmans T.C. (1951), An Analysis of Production as Efficient Combination of Activities, [in:] Koopmans T.C., Activity Analysis of Production and Allocation, Cowles Commission for Research in Economics, Monograph no. 13, New York.
Google Scholar

KPMG (2014), Dojrzałość innowacyjna przedsiębiorstw w Polsce 2014, http://kpmglegal.pl/wp‑content/uploads/2014/07/Dojrzalosc‑innowacyjna‑przedsiebiorstw‑w‑Polsce‑KPMG–2014.pdf [accessed 10.08.2016].
Google Scholar

Krupp H. (1984), Overview of Policy Issues: Panel Report on the Functions of Non‑University Research Institutes, [in:] Fusfeld H.I., Haklisch C.S. (eds.), National R&D and Innovation Systems and the Contributions of Universities. University‑Industry Research Interactions, Pergamon, New York: 95–100.
Google Scholar

Lucas R. (1988), On the mechanism of economic development, ‘Journal of Monetary Economics’, 22: 3–42.
Google Scholar

Lundvall B.‑A. (2005), National Innovation Systems – Analytical Concept and Development Tool, Paper presented at the DRUID conference, Copenhagen.
Google Scholar

Lundvall B.‑A. (1998), Why study national systems of innovations and national styles of innovation, ‘Technology Analysis and Strategic Management’, 10(4): 407–421.
Google Scholar

Mairesse J., Mohnen P. (2002), Accounting for Innovation and Measuring Innovativeness: An illustrative Framework and an Application, ‘The Economics of Technology and Innovation’, 92(2): 226–230.
Google Scholar

Maskell P., Malmberg A. (1997), Towards an explanation of regional specialization and industry agglomeration, ‘European Planning Studies’, 5(1): 25–41.
Google Scholar

McDaniel B.A. (2002), Entrepreneurship and innovation. An Economic Approach, New York‑London.
Google Scholar

Metcalfe S. (1995), The Economic Foundations of Technology Policy: Equilibrium and Evolutionary Perspectives, [in:] Stoneman P. (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change, Blackwell Publishers, Oxford (UK)/Cambridge (US).
Google Scholar

Ministry of Economy (2015), Innovation Strategy for Smart Specialisation. The Republic of Bulgaria 2014–2020, http://www.mi.government.bg [accessed 11.08.2016].
Google Scholar

Mojena R. (1977), Hierarchical grouping methods and stopping rules: an evaluation, ‘Computer Journal’, 20: 359–363.
Google Scholar

Nasierowski W., Arcelus F.J. (2003), On the Efficiency of National Innovation Systems, ‘Socio‑Economic Planning Sciences’, 37: 215–234.
Google Scholar

NBP (2016), Potencjał innowacyjny gospodarki: uwarunkowania, determinanty, perspektywy, Warszawa, https://www.nbp.pl/aktualnosci/wiadomosci_2016/20160530_Raport_innowacyjnosc.pdf [accessed 11.07.2016].
Google Scholar

Nelson R., (1993), National Innovation Systems. A Comparative Analysis, Oxford University Press, New York/Oxford.
Google Scholar

Niosi J. (2002), National systems of innovations are „x‑efficient” (and x‑effective). Why some are so slow learners?, ‘Research Policy’, 31: 291–302.
Google Scholar

Niosi J., Saviotti P.P., Bellon B., Crow M. (1993), National systems of innovations: in search of a workable concept, ‘Technology in Society’, 15: 207–227.
Google Scholar

Nonaka I., Takeuchi H. (1996), The Knowledge‑Creating Company, Oxford University Press, New York.
Google Scholar

Numminen S. (1996), National Innovation Systems: Pilot Case Study of the Knowledge Distribution Power of Finland, VTT Group for Technology Studies, Helsinki, Finland.
Google Scholar

OECD (2006), Economic Policy Reforms. Going for Growth, OECD, Paris.
Google Scholar

Reggiani A., Nijkamp P. (2009), Complexity and spatial networks, Springer, Berlin.
Google Scholar

Rigby J., Ramlogan R. (2013), The Impact of Effectiveness of Entrepreneurship Policy, Compendium of Evidence on the effectiveness of Innovation Policy, MIoIR‑NESTA, Manchester/London.
Google Scholar

Romer P. (1990), Endogenous technological change, ‘Journal of Political Economy’, 94(5): 71–102.
Google Scholar

Rousseau S., Rousseau R. (1997), Data Envelopment Analysis as a Tool for Constructing Scientometric Indicators, ‘Scientometrics’, 40(1): 45–56.
Google Scholar

Schumpeter J.A. (1934), The Theory of Economic Development, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Google Scholar

Schumpeter J.A. (1943), Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy, Allen and Unwin, London.
Google Scholar

Stimson R.J., Stough R.R., Roberts B.H. (2002), Regional economic development, Springer, Berlin.
Google Scholar

Stryjek J. (2015), Polityka innowacyjna i narodowy system innowacji w Polsce, http://bazekon.icm.edu.pl/bazekon/element/bwmeta1.element.ekon‑element–000171413581
Google Scholar

Tylec T. (2015), Wielkość i struktura finansowania działalności badawczo‑rozwojowej w krajach rozwiniętych gospodarczo. Wnioski dla Polski, ‘Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach, Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach’, Katowice.
Google Scholar