The Mundell‑Fleming Model and Macroeconomic Stabilization Policies

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1508-2008.26.25

Keywords:

policy rules, monetary policy autonomy, fiscal policy setting

Abstract

This paper analyzes the fiscal policy implications set in the Mundell‑Fleming (M‑F) model and its effectiveness in emerging economies. It also widens the scope of the policy mix with alternative exchange rates. The empirical evidence about the economies of Chile (1991–2003) and Colombia (1994–2004), about institutions, fiscal policy rule, and the eurozone conditions (1999), were considered relevant The paper has three sections a. The budget‑surplus fiscal policy rule and policy effectiveness, b. The role of institutions in setting policy rules, c. The experience of the Chilean and Colombian economies concerning fiscal policy rules within the M‑F framework. The main conclusion is that as long as country risk is lower due to countercyclical fiscal policy rules, governments have an alternative means of getting funds at a lower international interest rate. The fiscal policy effect on GDP (output)becomes positive.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bassetto, M. (2005), Equilibrium and government commitment, “Journal of Economic Theory”, 124 (1), pp. 79–105, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2004.06.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2004.06.001

Calderon, C., Duncan, R., Schmidt-Hebel, K. (2004), Institutions and Cyclical properties of Macroeconomics policies, “Working Papers”, 285, Central Bank of Chile, https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/1064721.pdf (accessed: 1.12.2021).

Central Bank of Chile (2001), Macroeconomics indicators 1974–2000, http://www.bcentral.cl (accessed: 1.12.2021).

Céspedes, L., Soto, C. (2005), Credibility and Inflation target in an emerging economy: The case of Chile, “Working Papers”, 312, Central Bank of Chile, https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/1160643.pdf (accessed: 1.12.2021).

De Gregorio, J. (2001), Macroeconomia, Princeton.

Ennis, H. (2007), Complementariedades y política macroeconómica, [in:] D. Heymann (ed.), Progresos en Macroeconomía, Asociación Argentina de Economía Política, Buenos Aires, pp. 1–34.

Favero, C., Monacelli, T. (2005), Fiscal Policy Rules and Regime (In)Stability: Evidence from the U.S., “IGIER Working Papers”, 282, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.665506 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.665506

Fuentes, J., Schmidt-Hebel, K., Soto, S. (2021), Fiscal Policy Rule and public investment in Chile, “IDB Working Paper Series”, 1189, https://doi.org/10.18235/0003105 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18235/0003105

Garcia, C. (2008), Inflación y crecimiento económico después de la intervención cambiaria, “Observatorio Económico”, 16, pp. 1–8, https://doi.org/10.11565/oe.vi16.306 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11565/oe.vi16.306

Grûnwald, C. (2018), Regla fiscal y su evolucion, Serie Informe económico, Instituto Libertad y Desarrollo, Santiago.

International Monetary Fund (2017), Fiscal Rules at a Glance, Washington, https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/fiscalrules/Fiscal%20Rules%20at%20a%20Glance%20-%20Background%20Paper.pdf (accessed: 1.12.2021).

Lozano, L. (2010), La regla fiscal y su papel estabilizador en Colombia: ¿qué se vislumbra en los próximos años?, “Finanzas y Política Económica”, 2 (1), pp. 9–28.

Maitra, S. (2017), Open Economy IS-LM Model. The Mundell-Fleming Model, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343655000 (accessed: 15.11.2021).

Moreira, F., Mendonca, M., Sachsida, A. (2021), Fiscal and monetary policy rules in Brazil: empirical evidence of monetary and fiscal dominance, “CEPAL Review”, 135, pp. 81–104, https://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/47818/1/RVI135_Moreira.pdf (accessed: 20.10.2021). DOI: https://doi.org/10.18356/16840348-2021-135-4

New Zealand Government (2015), An Introduction to New Zealand’s Fiscal Policy Framework, https://www.treasury.govt.nz/sites/default/files/2015-03/nzfpf-A5.pdf (accessed: 20.10.2021).

Piasecki, R., Wulf, E. (2014), Fiscal policy Rules. Evidence from Chilean Economy, “Review of Business & Finance Studies”, 5 (2), pp. 45–54.

Sachs, J., Larrain, F.B. (2003), Macroeconomics in the Global Economy, Pearson College.

Statista (n.d.), http://www.statista.com (accessed: 3.02.2022).

Stokey, N. (1991), Credible public policies, “Journal of Economics Dynamics and Control”, 15, pp. 627–656, https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1889(91)90036-Z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1889(91)90036-Z

Vargas, H. (2005), Exchange rate Policy and inflation targeting in Colombia, “Inter-American Development Bank. Working Paper”, 539, pp. 1–40.

Wang, P. (2005), The Mundell-Fleming Model, [in:] P. Wang, The Economics of Foreign Exchange and Global Finance, Springer, Berlin–Heidelberg, pp. 103–130, http://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-28524-5_6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-28524-5_6

Wolnicki, M., Piasecki, R. (2021), New Challenges Facing the Global Economy, University of Lodz, Lodz. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/8220-607-4

World Bank (2020), World Development Indicators Database, Washington D.C.

Downloads

Published

2023-09-29

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Betancourt, Erico Wulf, and Ryszard Piasecki. 2023. “The Mundell‑Fleming Model and Macroeconomic Stabilization Policies”. Comparative Economic Research. Central and Eastern Europe 26 (3): 145-57. https://doi.org/10.18778/1508-2008.26.25.