Odpowiedzialność w zakresie zrównoważonego rozwoju w Europie Środkowej i Wschodniej: empiryczna ocena audytu zrównoważonego rozwoju
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/1508-2008.24.20Słowa kluczowe:
raportowanie zrównoważonego rozwoju, oświadczenie dotyczące wiarygodności, GRI, społeczna odpowiedzialność biznesu, raportowanie, audytAbstrakt
Artykuł poddaje analizie działania firm z Europy Środkowej i Wschodniej polegające na audycie służącym zapewnieniu odpowiedzialności za realizację zasad zrównoważonego rozwoju. W oparciu o zmodyfikowane zasady kodowania wykorzystane we wcześniejszych badaniach, przeprowadzono konwencjonalną analizę treści oświadczeń dotyczących wiarygodności z 36 firm pochodzących z dziewięciu krajów. Wyniki wskazują na różnice w treści raportów, procesach i sposobach wdrażania standardów.
Wyłącznie duże i wielonarodowe przedsiębiorstwa z sektorów energetycznych z siedzibą w Polsce i na Węgrzech stanowią w badanej próbie typowy przykład firmy dążącej do stworzenia i poddania się audytowi sprawozdawczości dotyczącej zapewnienia zrównoważonego rozwoju. Spośród dziewięciu krajów reprezentowanych w badaniu, oświadczenia dotyczące wiarygodności sprawozdań o zapewnieniu zrównoważonego rozwoju firm pochodzących z Polski, Węgier i Rumunii wyróżniają się pod względem jakości. Zdecydowana większość firm audytujących należy do Wielkiej Czwórki, która wykorzystuje ISAE3000 a nie AA1100AS. Jednak niezależnie od typu podmiotu audytującego, interesariusze są zaniedbywani. Argumentuje się, że zwykłe przeniesienie doświadczeń z audytu finansowego do dziedziny zrównoważonego rozwoju, co w zasadzie już nastąpiło, nie jest dobrym rozwiązaniem. Autorzy twierdzą, że podążając tą drogą, podążamy w złym kierunku, a pod względem technicznym, szersze rozpowszechnienie AA1100AS i jego zasad, z większym naciskiem na uzyskanie wysokiej jakości oceny, a nie ograniczanie i zwiększanie roli interesariuszy, jest niezbędne aby wrócić na właściwą drogę.
Artykuł stanowi wkład do powstającej literatury na temat standardów odpowiedzialności i podkreśla potrzebę zwiększenia jakości audytu w obszarze zapewnienia zrównoważonego rozwoju.
Pobrania
Bibliografia
Ackers, B. (2017a), Independent corporate social responsibility assurance: a response to soft laws, or influenced by company size and industry sector?, “International Journal of Disclosure and Governance”, 14, pp. 278–298, https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-017-0026-7
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-017-0026-7
Ackers, B. (2017b), The Evolution of Corporate Social Responsibility Assurance – A Longitudinal Study, “Social and Environmental Accountability Journal”, 37 (2), pp. 97–117, https://doi.org/10.1080/0969160X.2017.1294097
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0969160X.2017.1294097
Bebbington, J., Unerman, J., O’Dwyer, B. (2014), Sustainability Accounting and Accountability, Routledge, London, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315848419
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315848419
Boiral, O., Gendron, Y. (2011), Sustainable Development and Certification Practices: Lessons Learned and Prospects, “Business Strategy and the Environment”, 20 (5), pp. 331–347, https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.701
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.701
Boiral, O., Heras-Saizarbitoria, I. (2020), Sustainability reporting assurance: Creating stakeholder accountability through hyperreality?, “Journal of Cleaner Production”, 243, 118596, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118596
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118596
Boiral, O., Heras-Saizarbitoria, I., Brotherton, M.-C. (2019a), Assessing and Improving the Quality of Sustainability Reports: The Auditors’ Perspective, “Journal of Business Ethics”, 155 (3), pp. 703–721, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3516-4
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3516-4
Boiral, O., Heras-Saizarbitoria, I., Brotherton, M.-C. (2019b), Professionalizing the assurance of sustainability reports: the auditors’ perspective, “Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal”, 33 (2), pp. 309–334, https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-03-2019-3918
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-03-2019-3918
Channuntapipat, C., Samsonova-Taddei, A., Turley, S. (2019), Exploring diversity in sustainability assurance practice, “Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal”, 32 (2), pp. 556–580, https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-05-2017-2940
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-05-2017-2940
Channuntapipat, C., Samsonova-Taddei, A., Turley, S. (2020), Variation in sustainability assurance practice: An analysis of accounting versus non-accounting providers, “The British Accounting Review”, 52 (2), 100843, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2019.100843
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2019.100843
Farooq, M.B., Villiers, C. de (2019a), How sustainability assurance engagement scopes are determined, and its impact on capture and credibility enhancement, “Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal”, 33 (2), pp. 417–445, https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-11-2018-3727
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-11-2018-3727
Farooq, M.B., Villiers, C. de (2019b), Sustainability Assurance: Who Are the Assurance Providers and What Do They Do?, [in:] S. Arvidsson (ed.), Challenges in Managing Sustainable Business, Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 137–154, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93266-8_6
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93266-8_6
Farooq, M.B., Villiers, C. de (2019c), The shaping of sustainability assurance through the competition between accounting and non-accounting providers, “Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal”, 32 (1), pp. 307–336, https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-10-2016-2756
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-10-2016-2756
Fédération des Experts Comptables Européens (2006), Key issues in sustainability assurance an overview. https://www.accountancyeurope.eu/wp-content/uploads/FEE_DP_Key_Issues_in_Sustainability_Assurance_-_An_Overview_06061362006441152.pdf (accessed: 19.06.2020).
Google Scholar
Gilbert, D.U., Rasche, A., Waddock, S. (2011), Accountability in a Global Economy: The Emergence of International Accountability Standards, “Business Ethics Quarterly”, 21 (1), pp. 23–44, https://doi.org/10.5840/beq20112112
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/beq20112112
Gray, R., Bebbington, J. (2000), Environmental accounting, managerialism and sustainability: Is the planet safe in the hands of business and accounting?, “Advances in Environmental Accounting & Management”, 1, pp. 1–44, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1479-3598(00)01004-9
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1479-3598(00)01004-9
GRI Database, https://database.globalreporting.org/ (accessed: 16.06.2020).
Google Scholar
Gürtürk, A., Hahn, R. (2016), An empirical assessment of assurance statements in sustainability reports: smoke screens or enlightening information?, “Journal of Cleaner Production”, 136 (A), pp. 30–41, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.089
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.089
Hahn, R., Kühnen, M. (2013), Determinants of sustainability reporting: a review of results, trends, theory, and opportunities in an expanding field of research, “Journal of Cleaner Production”, 59, pp. 5–21, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.005
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.005
Haider, M.B., Nishitani, K. (2020), Views of corporate managers on assurance of sustainability reporting: evidence from Japan, “International Journal of Disclosure and Governance”, 17 (1), pp. 1–19, https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-019-00070-0
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-019-00070-0
Hsieh, H.-F., Shannon, S.E. (2005), Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis, “Qualitative Health Research”, 15 (9), pp. 1277–1288, https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
Jones, M.J., Solomon, J.F. (2010), Social and environmental report assurance: Some interview evidence, “Accounting Forum”, 34 (1), pp. 20–31, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2009.11.002
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2009.11.002
Junior, R.M., Best, P.J., Cotter, J. (2014), Sustainability Reporting and Assurance: A Historical Analysis on a World‑Wide Phenomenon, “Journal of Business Ethics”, 120 (1), pp. 1–11, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1637-y
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1637-y
KPMG (2017), The road ahead. The KPMG Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2017, https://assets.kpmg/content/dam/kpmg/be/pdf/2017/kpmg-survey-of-corporate-responsibility-reporting-2017.pdf (accessed: 18.05.2020).
Google Scholar
Larrinaga, C., Rossi, A., Luque-Vilchez, M., Núñez-Nickel, M. (2020), Institutionalization of the Contents of Sustainability Assurance Services: A Comparison Between Italy and United States, “Journal of Business Ethics”, 163 (1), pp. 67–83, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-4014-z
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-4014-z
Maroun, W. (2019), Does external assurance contribute to higher quality integrated reports?, “Journal of Accounting and Public Policy”, 38 (4), 106670, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2019.06.002
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2019.06.002
Maroun, W. (2020), A Conceptual Model for Understanding Corporate Social Responsibility Assurance Practice, “Journal of Business Ethics”, 161 (1), pp. 187–209, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3909-z
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3909-z
Michelon, G., Patten, D.M., Romi, A.M. (2019), Creating Legitimacy for Sustainability Assurance Practices: Evidence from Sustainability Restatements, “European Accounting Review”, 28 (2), pp. 395–422, https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2018.1469424
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2018.1469424
Mikołajek-Gocejna, M. (2016), Zależność między społeczną odpowiedzialnością przedsiębiorstw a ich wynikami finansowymi – dowody a badań empirycznych, “Comparative Economic Research. Central and Eastern Europe”, 19 (4), pp. 67–84, https://doi.org/10.1515/cer-2016-0030
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cer-2016-0030
Mikołajek-Gocejna, M. (2018), Środowiskowy, społeczny i zarządczy aspekt indeksów społecznej odpowiedzialności – analiza porównawcza europejskich indeksów SRI, “Comparative Economic Research. Central and Eastern Europe”, 21 (3), pp. 25–44, https://doi.org/10.2478/cer-2018-0017
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/cer-2018-0017
Mock, T.J., Rao, S.S., Srivastava, R.P. (2013), The Development of Worldwide Sustainability Reporting Assurance, “Australian Accounting Review”, 23 (4), pp. 280–294, https://doi.org/10.1111/auar.12013
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/auar.12013
Moroney, R., Windsor, C., Aw, Y.T. (2012), Evidence of assurance enhancing the quality of voluntary environmental disclosures: an empirical analysis, “Accounting & Finance”, 52 (3), pp. 903–939, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-629X.2011.00413.x
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-629X.2011.00413.x
Nishitani, K., Haider, M.B., Kokubu, K. (2020), Are third-party assurances preferable to third-party comments for promoting financial accountability in environmental reporting?, “Journal of Cleaner Production”, 248, 119199, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119199
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119199
O’Dwyer, B., Owen, D.L. (2005), Assurance statement practice in environmental, social and sustainability reporting: a critical evaluation, “The British Accounting Review”, 37 (2), pp. 205–229, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2005.01.005
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2005.01.005
O’Dwyer, B., Owen, D. (2007), Seeking Stakeholder-Centric Sustainability Assurance, “Journal of Corporate Citizenship”, 25, pp. 77–94.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.9774/GLEAF.4700.2007.sp.00009
O’Dwyer, B., Owen, D., Unerman, J. (2011), Seeking legitimacy for new assurance forms: The case of assurance on sustainability reporting, “Accounting, Organizations and Society”, 36 (1), pp. 31–52, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2011.01.002
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2011.01.002
Park, J., Brorson, T. (2005), Experiences of and views on third-party assurance of corporate environmental and sustainability reports, “Journal of Cleaner Production”, 13 (10–11), pp. 1095–1106, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2004.12.006
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2004.12.006
Perego, P., Kolk, A. (2012), Multinationals” Accountability on Sustainability: The Evolution of Third-party Assurance of Sustainability Reports, “Journal of Business Ethics”, 110 (2), pp. 173–190, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1420-5
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1420-5
Power, M. (1997), Expertise and the construction of relevance: Accountants and environmental audit, “Accounting, Organizations and Society”, 22 (2), pp. 123–146, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(96)00037-2
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(96)00037-2
Power, M. (1999), The Audit Society, Oxford University Press, Oxford, https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198296034.001.0001
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198296034.001.0001
Quick, R., Inwinkl, P. (2020), Assurance on CSR reports: impact on the credibility perceptions of non-financial information by bank directors, “Meditari Accountancy Research”, 28 (5), pp. 833–862, https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-10-2019-0597
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-10-2019-0597
Rossi, A., Tarquinio, L. (2017), An analysis of sustainability report assurance statements, “Managerial Auditing Journal”, 32 (6), pp. 578–602, https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-07-2016-1408
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-07-2016-1408
Ruiz-Barbadillo, E., Martínez-Ferrero, J. (2020), Empirical analysis of the effect of the joint provision of audit and sustainability assurance services on assurance quality, “Journal of Cleaner Production”, 266, 121943, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121943
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121943
Safari, M., Areeb, A. (2020), A qualitative analysis of GRI principles for defining sustainability report quality: an Australian case from the preparers’ perspective, “Accounting Forum”, 44 (4), pp. 344–375, https://doi.org/10.1080/01559982.2020.1736759
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01559982.2020.1736759
Smith, J., Haniffa, R., Fairbrass, J. (2011), A Conceptual Framework for Investigating “Capture” in Corporate Sustainability Reporting Assurance, “Journal of Business Ethics”, 99, pp. 425–439, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0661-4
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0661-4
Stocker, F., Arruda, M.P. de, Mascena, K.M.C. de, Boaventura, J.M.G. (2020), Stakeholder engagement in sustainability reporting: A classification model, “Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management”, 27 (5), pp. 2071–2080, https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1947
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1947
Zorio, A., García-Benau, M.A., Sierra, L. (2013), Sustainability Development and the Quality of Assurance Reports: Empirical Evidence, “Business Strategy and the Environment”, 22 (7), pp. 484–500, https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1764
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1764
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Jak cytować
Numer
Dział
Licencja
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.