Praca socjalna i terapia rodziny: interdyscyplinarne korzenie interwencji w rodzinie

Autor

  • Robert Constable Loyola University Chicago, School of Social Work

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/2450-4491.03.09

Słowa kluczowe:

praca socjalna, terapia rodzin, systemowa terapia rodzin

Abstrakt

Praktyka pracy socjalnej odbywa się pomiędzy członkami rodzin a innymi instytucjami społecznymi, takimi jak: szkoły, systemy opieki zdrowotnej, systemy opieki społecznej i sądy. Czerpiąc z multidyscyplinarnych źródeł teoretycznych, artykuł łączy pracę socjalną i terapię rodzinną w celu opracowania współczesnego modelu praktyki pracy socjalnej z rodzinami. Istnieje pięć ogólnych zasad systemowej praktyki rodzinnej: 1) osoby są z natury relacyjne; 2) rodziny mają siły rodzące sprężystość psychiczną; 3) cykle życia rodzinnego postępują systemowo, generując relacyjne zadania dla członków rodziny; 4) powtarzające się interakcje rodzinne generują struktury relacyjne; 5) kultury, postrzegane przez członków rodziny, znajdują się w stanie dynamicznego ruchu, co wymaga transkulturowego zrozumienia interakcji rodziny.

Biogram autora

  • Robert Constable - Loyola University Chicago, School of Social Work

    Dyplomowany pracownik socjalny, emerytowany profesor na Uniwersytecie Loyola w Chicago. Skupiając swe zainteresowania na pracy socjalnej z rodzinami oraz pracy socjalnej w szkole, praktykując, ucząc i publikując na te tematy. W ostatnim czasie opublikował: School Social Work: Practice, Policy and Research [Praca socjalna w szkole: praktyka, założenia i badania naukowe] (2016, 8 wyd.) oraz Social Work with Families: Content and Process [Praca socjalna z rodzinami: zakres i proces] (2015, 2 wyd.). W latach 1990–1997 wykładał i udzielał konsultacji na uczelniach polskich i litewskich.

Bibliografia

Ainsworth M. D. S. (1973) The development of infant–mother attachment in: Caldwell B. M., Ricciutti H. N. (eds.) “Review of child development research”, vol. 3, Chicago, ILUniversity of Chicago Press: 1–94.

Ainsworth M. D. S., Bleher M. C., Waters E., Wall S. (1978) Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation, Hillsdale, NJ Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Beels C. (2009) Some historical conditions of narrative work, “Family Process”, 48 (3): 363–378.

Briar-Lawson K. (2016) Book Review: Social Work with Families: Content and Process (2nd ed.) “Journal of Teaching in Social Work”, vol. 36, no. 3: 326–329.

Bowlby J. (1969) Attachment and loss, vol. 1: Attachment, New York, Basic Books.

Breunlin D. C., Pinsof W., Russell W., Lebow J. (2013) Integrative problem-centered metaframeworks therapy I: Core concepts and hypothesizing, “Family Process”, 50 (3): 293–313.

Breunlin D. C., Schwartz R. C., Mac Kune-Karrer B. (1992) Metaframeworks: Transcending the models of family therapy, San Francisco, Jossey-Bass.

Burr W., Hill R., Nye F. I., Reiss I. L. (1979) Contemporary Theories about the Family, New York, The Free Press.

Cohen P. (2014a) The family: Diversity, inequality and social change, New York, W.W. Norton.

Cohen P. (2014b) Family diversity is the new normal for America’s children, Council on Contemporary Families, September 4, 2014, https://contemporaryfamilies.org/thenew-normal/

Constable R., Lee D. B. (2015) Social work with families: Content and process, 2nd edition, Chicago, Lyceum Books.

Constable R. (1984a) Phenomenological foundations for the understanding of family interaction, “Social Service Review”, 58 (1): 117–132.

Donley M. (1993) Attachment and the emotional unit, “Family Process”, 32 (1): 3–30.

Falck H. S. (1988) Social work: The membership perspective, New York, Springer.

Falck H. S. (1976) Individualism and communalism: Two or one?, “Social Thought”, 2 (3): 27–44.

Fishbane M. D. (2001) Relational narratives of the self, “Family Process”, 40 (3): 273–293.

Gottman J. M. (1999) The marriage clinic, New York, Norton.

Gottman J. M., Notarius, C. I. (2002), Marital research in the 20th century and a research agenda for the 21st century, “Family Process”, 41 (2): 159–198.

Greenberg J. R., Mitchell S. A. (1983) Object relations in psychoanalytic theory, Cambridge, MA Harvard University Press.

Gurman A. S. (2011) Couple therapy research and the practice of couple therapy: Can we talk?, “Family Process”, 50 (3): 280–292.

Hartman A., Laird J. (1983) Family-centered social work practice, New York, Free Press.

Hearn G. (1969) The general systems approach: Contributions toward an holistic conception of social work, New York, Council on Social Work Education.

James W. (1981) Principles of psychology, vol. I, Cambridge, MA Harvard University Press.

Johnson S. (2004) The practice of emotionally focused couple therapy, New York, Brunner-Routledge.

Johnson S. (2003) Emotionally focused couples therapy: Empiricism and art in: T. L. Sexton, G. R. Weeks, M. S. Robbins, Handbook of Family Therapy, New York, Brunner-Routledge: 263–280.

Kernberg O. F. (1976) Object relations theory and clinical psychoanalysis, New York, Jason Aronson.

Kohut H. (1977) The restoration of the self, New York, International Universities Press.

Lebow J. (1997) The integrative revolution in couple and family therapy, “Family Process”, 36 (1).

Lebow J. (2003) Integrative approaches to couple and family therapy in: Sexton T. L., Weeks G. R., Robbins M. S., Handbook of family therapy, New York, Brunner-Routledge: 201–225.

Lebow J. (2013) Programs for strengthening families, “Family Process”, 52(3): 351–354.

Lebow J. (2014) Whither family therapy: Alive and flourishing amidst the changes, “Family Process”, 53 (3): 365–366.

Lee D. (1995) The Korean perspective on death and dying in: J. Parry, A. Ryan (eds.), A cross-cultural look at death, dying, and religion, Chicago, IL Nelson-Hall: 193–214.

McGoldrick M., Carter E., Garcia-Preto N. (2010) The expanded life cycle: Individual, family and social components, 4th ed. Boston, MA: Pearson.

McGoldrick M., Shibusawa T. (2012) The family life cycle in: Normal family processes, F. Walsh (ed.), 4th ed., New York, Guilford: 375–398.

Mead G. H. (1934) Mind, self and society, Chicago, IL University of Chicago Press.

Messer S. B. (ed.) (2001) Special issue on assimilative integration, “Journal of Psychotherapy Integration”, 11(1).

Mikulincer M., Florian V., Cowan P. A., Cowan C. P. (2002) Attachment security in couple relationships: A systemic model and its implications for family dynamics, “Family Process”, 41 (3): 405–434.

Nichols M. P. (2013) Family therapy: Concepts and methods, 10th ed., Boston, MA Pearson, Boston, Allyn & Bacon: 297–305.

Pinsof W. M., Breunlin D., Russell W., Lebow J. (2013) Integrative problem-solving metaframeworks therapy II: Planning, conversing and reading feedback, “Family Process”, 50 (3): 314–336.

Retzlaff R., Sydow K. v., Beher S., Haun M. W., Schweitzer J. (2013) The efficacy of systemic therapy for internalizing and other disorders of childhood and adolescence: A systematic review of 38 randomized trials, “Family Process”, 52 (4): 619–652.

Richmond M. (1917) Social diagnosis, New York, Sage.

Richmond M. (1907) The good neighbor, Philadelphia, Lippincott.

Ryan W. (1971) Blaming the victim, New York, Pantheon Books.

Ryle G. (1971) The thinking of thoughts: What is ‘le penseur’ doing? in: Collected Papers. London, UK, Hutchinson: 450–496.

Sexton T. L., Alexander J. F. (2003) Functional family therapy: A mature clinical model for working with at-risk adolescents and their families in: T. L. Sexton, G. R. Weeks, M. S. Robbins, Handbook of family therapy, New York, Brunner-Routledge: 323–350.

Sexton T. L., Datchi C. (2014) The development and evolution of family therapy research: Its impact on practice, current status, future directions, “Family Process”, 53 (3): 434–444.

Sheidow A. J., Henggeler S. W., Schoenwald S. K. (2003), Multisystemic therapy in: T. L. Sexton, G. R. Weeks, M. S. Robbins, Handbook of family therapy, New York, Brunner-Routledge: 303–322.

Siporin M. (1972a) Introduction to social work practice, New York, Macmillan.

Siporin M. (1972b) Situational assessment and intervention, “Social Casework”, 53: 91–109.

Sperling M. B., Berman W. H. (1994) Attachment in adults, New York, Guilford.

Stern D. N. (1985) The interpersonal world of the infant: A view from psychoanalysis and developmental psychology, New York, Basic Books.

Sullivan H. S. (1938–1939) A note on formulating the relationship of the individual and the group, “American Journal of Sociology”, 4: 932–937.

Sydow K. V., Beher S., Schweitzer J., Retzlaff R. (2010), The efficacy of systemic therapy with adult patients: A meta-content analysis in 38 randomized controlled trials, “Family Process”, 49 (4): 457–485.

Sydow K. V., Retzlaff R., Beher S., Haun M. W., Schweitzer J. (2013), The efficacy of systemic therapy for child and adolescent externalizing disorders: A systematic review of 47 RCT, “Family Process”, 52 (4): 576–618.

Turner R. (1970) Family interaction, New York, Wiley.

Walsh F. (1999) Strengthening family resilience, New York, Guilford.

Walsh F. (2003) Family resilience: A framework for clinical practice, “Family Process”, 42 (1): 1–18.

Walsh F. (2012) Family resilience: Strengths forged through adversity in: F. Walsh, Normal family processes, 4th ed., New York, Guilford: 399–427.

Weingarten K. (1991) The discourses of intimacy: Adding to a social constructionist and feminist view, “Family Process”, 30: 285–306.

Weingarten K. (2000) Witnessing, wonder and hope, “Family Process”, 39: 389–402.

Weingarten K. (2010) Reasonable hope: Construct, clinical applications and supports, “Family Process”, 49 (1): 5–25.

Weingarten K. (2013) The “cruel radiance of what is”: Helping couples live with chronic illness, “Family Process”, 50(3).

White M. (2007) Maps of narrative practice, New York, Norton.

Opublikowane

2016-12-20

Jak cytować

Praca socjalna i terapia rodziny: interdyscyplinarne korzenie interwencji w rodzinie. (2016). Nauki O Wychowaniu. Studia Interdyscyplinarne, 3(2), 147-160. https://doi.org/10.18778/2450-4491.03.09