The People’s Ability to Communicate from the Logical and Psychological Perspective

Authors

  • Piotr Łukowski Uniwersytet Łódzki

Keywords:

intuition, empathy, degrees of empathy, natural language, speech act, meaning, tolerance of an expression, vagueness of an expression, generality of an expression, accent, contextuality of meaning, performative of an utterance, indirect speech act, context of an utterance

Abstract

In the paper, the meaning of an utterance is considered from two perspectives: the logical and the psychological one. The logical approach takes into account a number of factors affecting the final meaning of the spoken words. These include, among others: tolerance of an utterance, its vagueness, generality, accent, indirect speech and contextuality. These factors are recognized intuitively by both the message sender and recipient. Otherwise, they could not reach an agreement. It turns out that this problem is considered not only in the logic but also in the field of psychology. Different levels of the ability to recognize the meaning of an utterance corresponds to different levels of empathy and therefore also a different level of communication ability. It seems that logical intuition and psychological empathy are highly convergent abilities. The aim of the paper is not to show that intuition and empathy are the same, but that the same issues are dealt with by various sciences, and therefore the efforts should be merged. In other words, this work is a kind of an incentive to undertake interdisciplinary research. If possible, such measures should replace efforts made in isolation from other disciplines.

Author Biography

Piotr Łukowski, Uniwersytet Łódzki

Piotr Łukowski — doctor habilitatus, associate professor, Head of the Department of Cognitive Science at the Institute of Psychology at the University of Łódź. Scientific interests: philosophical and formal logic, philosophy of the natural language, paradoxes of thought, colloquial reasonings, and the issues of persuasion and manipulation.

References

Ajdukiewicz K. (1965) Logika pragmatyczna, Warszawa, Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
Google Scholar

Austin J. L. (1993) Jak działać słowami?, w: J. L. Austin, Mówienie i poznawanie: wykłady i rozprawy filozoficzne, tłum. B. Chwedeńczuk, Warszawa, Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, s. 543-713.
Google Scholar

Balas R. i in. (2009) (red.) Poznawcze i afektywne mechanizmy intuicji, Warszawa, Wydawnictwo Instytutu Psychologii PAN.
Google Scholar

Baron-Cohen S. (2014) Teoria zła. O empatii i genezie okrucieństwa, tłum. A. Nowak, Sopot, Wydawnictwo Smak Słowa.
Google Scholar

Bauer J. (2008) Empatia. Co potrafią lustrzane neurony, tłum. M. Guzowska-Dąbrowska, Warszawa, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Google Scholar

Black M. (1949) Language and Philosophy. Studies in Method, Ithaca–New York, Cornell University Press.
Google Scholar

Chwistek L. (1963 [1934]) Granice zdrowego rozsądku, w: L. Chwistek, Pisma filozoficzne i logiczne. Tom 2, Warszawa, Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
Google Scholar

Davis M. H. (2001) Empatia. O umiejętności współodczuwania, tłum. J. Kubiak, Gdańsk, Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne.
Google Scholar

Dummett M. (1991) The Logical Basis of Metaphysics, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University.
Google Scholar

Eisenberg N. (2005) Empatia i sympatia, w: Psychologia emocji, M. Lewis, J. M. Haviland-Jones (red.), Gdańsk, Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne.
Google Scholar

Kahneman D. (2012) Pułapki myślenia. O myśleniu szybkim i wolnym, tłum. P. Szymczak, Poznań, Wydawnictwo Media Rodzina.
Google Scholar

Keil F. C. (1989) Concepts, kinds and cognitive development, Cambridge, MIT Press.
Google Scholar

Kolańczyk A. (2009) Mechanizmy intuicji odkrywane w badaniach, w: Poznawcze i afektywne mechanizmy intuicji, R. Balas i in. (red.), Warszawa, Wydawnictwo Instytutu Psychologii PAN, s. 167-184.
Google Scholar

Łukowski P. (2012) Logika praktyczna z elementami wiedzy o manipulacji, Warszawa, Wydawnictwo Wolters Kluwer.
Google Scholar

Maruszewski T. (2014) Wstęp, w: S. Baron-Cohen, Teoria zła. O empatii i genezie okrucieństwa, tłum. A. Nowak, Sopot, Wydawnictwo Smak Słowa.
Google Scholar

Piaget J. (2005 [1923]) Mowa i myślenie dziecka, tłum. A. Cieślak, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Piaget J. (2006 [1926]) Jak sobie dziecko wyobraża świat, tłum. M. Gawlik, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Piaget J., Inhelder B. (1974) The child’s construction of quantities, London, Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Google Scholar

Reinach A. (1983 [1913]) Die apriorischen Grundlagen des bürgerlischen Rechts, Jahrbuch für „Philosophie und phänomenologische Forschung” nr 1/2, s. 685-847.
Google Scholar

Przekład angielski: The Apriori Foundations of the Civil Law, tłum. John F. Crosby, „Aletheia” nr 3 , s. 1-142.
Google Scholar

Russell B. (1923) Vagueness, „The Australasian Journal of Psychology and Philosophy” nr 1, s. 84-92.
Google Scholar

Searle J. R. (1987) Czynności mowy. Rozważania z filozofii języka, tłum. B. Chwedeńczuk, Warszawa, Wydawnictwo PAX.
Google Scholar

Searle J. R. Vanderveken D. (1985) Foundations of Illocutionary Logic, Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Unger P. (1979) Why There Are No People, Midwest Studies in Philosophy 5, Studies in Metaphysics, s. 177-222.
Google Scholar

Unger P. (2004) The Mental Problems of the Many, w: Oxford Studies in Metaphysics. Volume 1, D. Zimmermann (red.), Oxford.
Google Scholar

Vanderveken D. (1990) Meaning and Speech Acts: Principles of language use, Cambridge, University Press.
Google Scholar

Wygotski L. S. (1989 [1934]) Myślenie i mowa, tłum. E. Flesznerowa, J. Fleszner, Warszawa, Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
Google Scholar

Published

2015-09-30

How to Cite

Łukowski, P. (2015). The People’s Ability to Communicate from the Logical and Psychological Perspective. Nauki O Wychowaniu. Studia Interdyscyplinarne, 1(1), 88–109. Retrieved from https://czasopisma.uni.lodz.pl/wychow/article/view/11312