The Everyday Reality of Metaphor in the Perspective of Cognitive Science. Attempt of Critical Analysis

Authors

  • Aleksander Gemel Uniwersytet Łódzki

Keywords:

metaphor, language, conceptualization, domain

Abstract

The aim of the paper is to provide a critical analysis of the basic assumptions of the cognitive theory of metaphor. The first part is devoted to the issues related to the coherence of the concept of metaphorical mapping. The second one discusses the validity of the metaphorization process in terms of schema-concretization framework. Finally, the third part raises the problem of using cognitive metaphor as the primary tool for the conceptualization of the realm of abstract thinking. An additional objective of the text is to display the presence of metaphor in everyday communication processes, conceptualization of common experience and thus also in the scientific and educational practice.

Author Biography

  • Aleksander Gemel, Uniwersytet Łódzki

    Aleksander Gemel – PhD, assistant professor at the Department of Cognitive Science at the Institute of Psychology at the Faculty of Educational Sciences of the University of Łódź. Research interests: issues of the contemporary philosophy of language and cognitive science.

References

Arystoteles (2009) Retoryka. Retoryka dla Aleksandra. Poetyka, przeł. H. Podbielski, Warszawa, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.

Clausner T., Croft W. (1997) Productivity and schematicity in metaphors, „Cognitive Science”, nr 21/3, s. 247–282.

Fauconnier G. (1997) Mappings in Thought and Language, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Gärdenfors P. (2004) Conceptual Spaces: The Geometry of Thought, Cambridge, MIT Press.

Gärdenfors P. (2014) The Geometry of Meaning: Semantics Based on Conceptual Spaces, Cambridge, MIT Press.

Gemel A. (2015) Językowy model poznania. Kognitywne komponenty w kontynentalnej filozofii języka, Łódź, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.

Lakoff G., Johnson M. (2010) Metafory w naszym życiu, przeł. T. P. Krzeszowski, Warszawa, Aletheia.

Langacker R. (2009) Gramatyka kognitywna. Wprowadzenie, przeł. E. Tabakowska et al., Kraków, Universitas.

Markowski M. P. (1996) Nietzsche i hermeneutyka, „Teksty Drugie: Teoria Literatury, Krytyka, Interpretacja”, nr 1/37, s. 20–41.

Pieniążek P. (2002) Subwersywne poplecznictwo: Foucault/Nietzsche, „Hybris. Internetowy Magazyn Filozoficzny”, nr 2.

Tyler A., Evans V. (2001) The relations between experience, conceptual structure and meanning: Non-temporal uses of tense and language teaching w: Applied Cognitive Linguistics, vol. 1: Theory and Language Acquisition, M. Pütz, S. Niemeier, R. Dirven (red.), Berlin–New York, Mounton de Gruyter, s. 63–105.

Downloads

Published

2016-04-04

How to Cite

Gemel, Aleksander. 2016. “The Everyday Reality of Metaphor in the Perspective of Cognitive Science. Attempt of Critical Analysis”. Nauki O Wychowaniu. Studia Interdyscyplinarne 2 (1): 176-86. https://czasopisma.uni.lodz.pl/wychow/article/view/11399.